RX 7900 XTX is better because it has more x
X is deprecated. Use the RWayland 7900 WaylandTWayland instead.
But what about the xXx_RX_7900_xXx?
But X is bad, as proved by Elon Musk - so it should be the other way around.
That X is twice as much vram, which funny enough, is great for running ai models
My question is, is X better than XTX? XTX has more Xs, but X has only Xs. I think I need AI to solve this quandary.
I switched to duckduckgo before this bullshit, but this would 100% make me switch if I hadn't already.
Who wants random ai gibberish to be the first thing they see?
DuckDuckGo started showing AI results for me.
I think it uses the bing engine iirc.
Sure, but it's trivial to turn it off. While you're there, also turn off ads.
And you can use multiple models, which I find handy.
There is some stuff that AI, or rather LLM search, is useful for, at least the time being.
Sometimes you need some information that would require clicking through a lot of sources just to find one that has what you need. With DDG, I can ask the question to their four models*, using four different Firefox containers, copy and paste.
See how their answers align, and then identify keywords from their responses that help me craft a precise search query to identify the obscure primary source I need.
This is especially useful when you don't know the subject that you're searching about very well.
*ChatGPT, Claude, Llama, and Mixtral are the available models. Relatively recent versions, but you'll have to check for yourself which ones.
Better than an Ad I guess? Not sure if my searches haven't returned any AI stuff like this or if my brain is already ignoring them like ads.
The plan is to monetize the AI results with ads.
I'm not even sure how that works, but I don't like it.
Sounds like the advice you'd get in the first three comments asking a question on Reddit.
I wonder where they trained the AI model to answer such a question lol.
Don't forget the glue on the pizza
Here is what kagi delivers with the same prompt:
NB: quick answer is only generated when ending your search with a question mark
Problem is, you cannot trust it's not hallucinating these stats
At least it's citing sources and you can check to make sure. And from my anecdotal evidence it has been pretty good so far. It also told me on some occasions that the queried information was not found in it's sources instead of just making something up. But it's not perfect for sure, it's always better to do manual research but for a first impression and to find some entry points I've found it useful so far
That being said, I can't trust MKBHD is not hallucinating either.
its not completely useless... i only asked copilot one thing and it worked; 'how do i remove or completely disable copilot'
I love this 😂
ChatGPT4o can do some impressive and useful things. Here, Im just sending it a mediocre photo of a product with no other context, I didnt type a question. First, its identifying the subject, a drink can. Then its identifying the language used. Then its assuming I want to know about the product so its translating the text without being asked, because it knows I only read english. Then its providing background and also explaining what tamarind is and how it tastes. This is enough for me to make a fully informed decision. Google translate would require me to type the text in, and then would only translate without giving other useful info.
It was delicious.
Google: ok so the AI in search results is a good thing, got it!
The search engine LLMs suck. I'm guessing they use very small models to save compute. ChatGPT 4o and Claude 3.5 are much better.
And good luck typing that in if you don't know the alphabet it's written in and can't copy/paste it.
It goes without saying that this shit doesn't really understand what's outputting; it's picking words together and parsing a grammatically coherent whole, with barely any regard to semantics (meaning).
It should not be trying to provide you info directly, it should be showing you where to find it. For example, linking this or this*.
To add injury in this case it isn't even providing you info, it's bossing you around. Typical Microsoft "don't inform a user, tell it [yes, "it"] what it should be doing" mindset. Specially bad in this case because cost vs. benefit varies a fair bit depending on where you are, often there's no single "right" answer.
*OP, check those two links, they might be useful for you.
LLMs don't "understand" anything, and it's unfortunate that we've taken to using language related to human thinking to talk about software. It's all data processing and models.
Yup, 100% this. And there's a crowd of muppets arguing "ackshyually wut u're definishun of unrurrstandin/intellijanse?" or "but hyumans do...", but come on - that's bullshit, and more often than not sealioning.
Don't get me wrong - model-based data processing is still useful in quite a few situations. But they're only a fraction of what big tech pretends that LLMs are useful for.
7900 XTX; more powerful, therefore better.
7900 XT; cheaper, therefore better.
I checked it, it’s true. Side note: it’s “the saté of AI.” FTFY. From what I’ve heard it’s even better than 🍿to sit back and watch this farce unfold.
At the very least it failed in a way that's obvious by giving you contradictory statements. If it left you with only the wrong statements, that's when "AI" becomes really insidiuos.
SearXNG only returns results search engines agree on. That removes ads and this bullshit
What do you expect from a Google AI? BUY SOMETHING BUY SOMETHING BUY SOMETHING.
[edit forgot the /s]
Not that you’re wrong, but you can clearly see Bing in the screenshot lol.
Seems we are on par with AI after all.
Literally says "Microsoft" in the top left.
It's not useless, it's saying you can't afford the better quality product you dirty, dirty poor.
You can do this with practically any versus question and get hilarious results
First of all, yes
Second option is no
When presented with yes / no pick no, no is the clear yes
Yeah AI can be wonky, but what idiot would spend a shitload of money on a graphics card without even being willing to click an article and read a bit?
It's on you if you do that. Even if the AI shit worked way better, why would you trust there aren't shady things happening to influence the AI and have you spend more money.
My dad falls into this category he constantly replaces things with way worse things just because they are new, I can't get my mind round how he can replace really good working stuff with new junk that isn't even capable of doing the job.
Wish I was joking but he does this constantly.
That’s a good summary. Google Gemini is no better. Type in a question and it starts off great but then devolves into other brands, other steps to do something that isn’t related to the thing you asked. It’s just terrible and someone will sue them over it next year. Just wait.
Hello, fellow humans. I too am human, just like you! I have skin, and blood, and guts inside me, which is not at all disgusting. Just another day of human!
Won't you share a delicious cup of
motor oillemonaide with me? It's nice and refridgerated, so it will cool down our bodies without the use of cooling fans!However we too can use cooling fans. They will just be placed on the ceiling, or in a box, or self standing, and oscillating. Not at all inside our bodies, connected to a board controlled by our CPUs that we clearly don't have!
Now come, let us take our colored paper with numbers and pictures of previous human rulers and exchange them for human food prepared by not fully adult humans who haven't matured to the age where their brains develop the ability to care about food sanitation. Then we shall complain that our meal cost too many paper dollars, while recieving less and less potato stick products every year. Ignoring completely the risk of heart disease by indulging in the amounts of food we desire to aquire.
Finally we shall retreat to our place of residence, and complain on the internet that our elected leaders are performing poorly. Rather than
terminate the programvote the poor performing humans out, we shall instead complain that it is other humans fault for voting them in. Making no attempt to change our broken system that has been broken our entire existence, with no signs of improving. Instead every 4 years we will make an effort to write down names of people we've already complained about in the hopes that enough people write down the same names, and that will fix the problem.Oh. Shall I request amazon.com to purchase more fans and cooling units? The news being reported that tempatures will soon reach 130F on a regular basis, and all humans will slowly perish.
Shall I share photographs of the new CEO of starbucks who's daily commute involves a personal jet aircraft, which surely isn't compounding the problem at all?
Jokes aside (and this whole AI search results thing is a joke) this seems like an artifact of sampling and tokenization.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Gemini tokens for XTX are "XT" and "X" or something like that, so it's got quite a chance of mixing them up after it writes out XT. Add in sampling (literally randomizing the token outputs a little), and I'm surprised it gets any of it right.
Garbage in, something something
This is not going to stop me from wanting better research. I'll still go to Userbenchmark just to be sure. AI isn't going to tell me what it thinks and expect me to take it face value.
I think you're missing that the AI said "The XTX is great, the XT is not worth it: choose the XT".
It’s prolly a bot
A good AI summary would tell you the benchmark scores and general pricing, but yes, it's better to go to UserBenchmark anyway--- especially since the whole ploy from search is to keep you from going there, robbing the original source of it's ad revenue.
I wonder if they couldn't feed the output back into gpt to realize the out makes no sense?
Assuming it takes its answer from search results, and the search results are all affiliate marketing sites that just want you to click on a link and buy something, this makes perfect sense.
