What's the weirdest thing you're upset about?
The world is cruel and ugly. There are plenty of justifiable things to be upset and distraught over. I don't want to hear about those. I want to know what bizarre out of left field takes you have that infuriates you.
I'm still upset about Tenochtitlan falling and being buried. I'm a gringo, I shouldn't have an opinion about Lake Texcoco being drained centuries ago.
That vacuums are so terribly loud and whiny (and unnecessarily tiny space heaters). Older vacuums used to be bigger and run slower, but in my experience vacuumed as much or even better. Nowadays they put several kilowatt motors in there that somehow don't do as much but produce immense noise and heat.
If someone vacuums with their window open I can tell from over 100m away by the whine. Fuck that.
I used to hate vaccuming because of that. I'm glad to have an actually quiet vacuum now (a Henry). They're rare, but they do exist.
People who chew with their mouths open should be fucking euthanized.
Obviously, I don’t actually think that, but as a misophonic person who was brought up right, it drives me fucking insane when people do this.
Timezones are fucking dumb and I hate them
I understand why we have timezones, but I've never heard an explanation for leap seconds that was particularly compelling.
I know that years and days don't exactly match up, but as far as I'm concerned, whoever it is that's being inconvenienced by the Earth being a few seconds out of rotation can go figure out their own workaround instead of messing up a million peoples' daily rollup scripts.
I think you mean daylight savings time is dumb & you hate it,(?) which would be understandable.
Time zones however are part of nature.
Hating daylight savings isn't weird, it's dumb and everyone knows it's dumb.
Timezones are arbitrary lines on the map that were made when trains were new and there was no good way to coordinate otherwise. We are way past that, everyone has an automatically synced and precise way of telling time on them pretty much at all times. The "time" is an arbitrary number. Noon is not when the sun is highest in the sky most of the year unless you live near the equator, midnight is rarely "the middle of the night", 9 to 5 should be deleted, and have one universal time would be one step closer to uniting human kind.
Timezones are fucking dumb, it's not the 1800s. I'll fight to the death over this.
Found the programmer.
On tinder, I can't fucking stand seeing pictures of people's kids. Like, if I'm swiping, and I come across a woman with pictures of her kids? Hell no. Automatic left swipe.
I know that that picture has probably been logged on a dozen servers, it's been scrapped for AI training, and someone is already falsifying videos with her kid's face before she gets a first date. And I get she might not know that. But I kinda can't help feeling like a responsible person would think about these things and try to learn about them.
Also, I'm pissed that it's happening at all, and people who have no idea it's happening get caught in the crossfire. Their kids will grow up in a world where generative AI can perfectly replicate them online, where intelligence agencies have cross referenced data on their every movement and formative event from their childhood. And their parents unwittingly made that easier instead of trying to protect them.
That drives me up the wall.
That everyone dies alone.
Really? Some people die in airplane crash while holding hands with a loved one sitting next to them.
The lovers who died in an embrace together in that Pompeii volcano disaster a long time ago
People die together sometimes in car crashes
I’m reading through the nearly all of the comments here and I’m like…
“Yup! Me too. Here’s your upvote.”
Don't send me videos if the background audio is some asshat wheeze-laughing about whatever supposed funny thing is playing. It's never funny and it ruins my interest in watching the shit immediately.
I feel the same about videos with titles like "Try not to laugh challenge" - well guess what, I'm not watching your video and I won your challenge, plus I saved myself some time. Just... leave it to me to decide for myself what I find funny, okay?
People who loudly watch videos on their phone in public spaces or stores/restaurants should be caned.
I don't want to listen to your ignorant ass braying like a fucking mule at some right-wing hack reheating the anti-trans memes he found on Reddit while I'm eating breakfast with my wife. Maybe you should put the phone down and meditate on why you're the only person in this place eating alone.
China is so bad when it comes to this. A single train car can have like 10 people on their phone speakers - its utter chaos and I genuinely don't understand how people can live like this. When wife and I travel we're both wearing noise canceling headphones lol
This shouldn't be weird, but I'm consistently upset at how dumb the average idiot is.
It's scary how stupid most people are without even realizing it and I hate how I have to suffer for it every day.
Not enough people winning Darwin awards anymore LOL
Loud lawnmowers. Ass hats who maintain the classic American yard. Every Saturday morning on cue, the whole neighborhood erupts into noise. It's so loud.
Everyone in my area has about a quarter acre of land, yet here come the zero turn riding mower guys, mowing their grass too low, every weekend, just to water it the next day.
They are loud, disruptive, and just remind me we are slowly killing the planet every day for vainity yards.
I have a reel mower from the 1950's I found and fixed up. I got a lot of compliments the first summer I used it, it has self shapening blades and works mostly well. Folks were shocked I was using it, one lady stopped and even gsve me a "you get it girl!", like what? It's a quarter acre people, and takes me 30-40 mins. Why do they need giant gas guzzling, louds stinky mowers? After a few years with the reel mower, I did get an electric line trimmer, .. I'm crazy, but sometimes I mow most of my very small lawn with it when I dont want to fix and use my reel mower. It's quiet, it doesnt smell, and I have control to skip over dirt/sparse patches. I can leave areas longer where I see native plants popping up. I feel like im working with the land, not just decimating it.
They ride these giant mowers up and down the street, they mow dirt just the same as they mow field. I literally get triggered everytime I hear one start up, so often, it's a running joke in the house. It's a quarter acre lots here, not baseball fields.
Perfect lawns, but then its just bittersweet growing wild on the edges taking over trees.
I also hate bittersweet. Like, really really hate bittersweet. It kills everything and takes over gardens. Invasive garbage that may seem like a cool plant to the unknowing eye, but it is invasive garbage everyone just looks past as it kills our native trees and plants, suffocating the life forms they parasite off from. I have to stay vigilant to keep it from my yard. It is persistent, it'll tear your house down if you let it.
I hate lawnmowers and bittersweet. These things make me feel distraught.
I agree with you. There's something a little nostalgic about lawnmower noise, but if you live without it for a while it's so much nicer. I don't have lawns at any of my house- crushed coral and desert dirt- but it's been nice to see everyone get irritated with draining gas and fixing carburetors every year and switch to electric mowers which are mutch quieter.
I can tell you're not a homeowner.
What the fuck else are people supposed to do with their yard?
If you don't cut the grass, it grows and eventually you'll start getting brush. Not to mention lots of idiots have HOAs which mandate they cut the grass.
Reseed with clover and then plant moss and native flora. Its good for helping out bees and other pollinators and invites other wildlife into your yard if live up against woods like I do. I've seen rabbits, raccoons, deer, flocks of turkey, and even a bobcat once.
HOAs can eat my whole ass.
Plant native species! Anything but lawn grass!! For the love of insects and ecological diversity.
I explained how I do my yard in the comment. I don't let it go crazy, I maintain it. I have made four garden beds here since getting the house, and that's in addition to the four already here. Both for flower and vegetables. I have a potted plant corner, and a "track" where the grass grows low or turns to dirt from my son doing laps around the house and playing baseball in the back. If I was a millionaire (I'd move) I'd like to put stone on the "track" he made because it follows the natural curves of the yard. The front yard is sparse, it's so dry and like sand, I don't have to mow that side, I hit it with the trimmer if it gets wild. I've seeded with clover and a native grass type. I keep a small patch over grown, circling around a tree, maintain it with weeding, and give space back for the insects. It's filled with purple flowers most of the year. A typical lawn care person would just mow it over.
What I'm getting at, is folks with brown grass they still mow weekly. Whether its going to rain or not, weather their grass is long or not, they mow it to check it off their list. Every weekend. Then, if you look, some houses like this, there's invasives just growing everywhere on the edges of their properties. So lazy. To mow ones lawn, fat ass on a riding mower for less than a quarter acre of lawn, just mow it and put it away, while thier tree line suffers with invasives.
My goal is to have no grass, but my son's track and baseball area, and the rest garden. As it stands I only have to mow maybe 40% of my yard, and I'll be damned if I'll fall in line to get a riding mower to kill beneficial plants every weekend, while leaving the harmful ones.
all of my hatred and disgust is perfectly and completely justified
bingo.
like LED headlights that are obviously way too bright. no, I don't care that you bought it like that. you chose to buy it like that. you are the consumer and you have responsibilities. you are therefore an asshole. perfectly justified and reasonable take.
I'm sick to fucking death of hearing about the quantum multiverse. It's a delusional fantasy, and even though I respect the hell out of Sean Carol, it's time for him to shut the fuck up about it and stop giving it air.
I'm tired of hearing about the quantum multiverse which is a fantasy, and I'm tired of hearing about quantum consciousness and all that other fucking horse shit.
Why are you so confident in your understanding of it?
Pathetic troll
Nah, they're right, it is fantasy. I think some people have in their heads that particles spread out like waves in 3D space and Many Worlds is just like an objective collapse model where it collapses back into a particle when you look at it, but where all outcomes happen in a different branch of the multiverse rather than just having one outcome.
The reality is that it is only actually possible to consistently map quantum waves to 3D space when you have a single particle. The moment you introduce two or three, it quickly breaks down because the number of quantum waves grows exponentially. If you have 3 spin-1/2 particles then you would describe their state with 8 waves. You cannot consistently break apart 8 into 3. You end up quickly finding that it is actually impossible to assign the waves to any location at all in space or time, so you cannot think of them as something like a propagating field mode or anything like that.
These are waves made of nothing that do not exist anywhere and nobody can see them. One of the weirdest things about quantum mechanics I do not think people appreciate enough is how you evolve something that seems to have no relationship at all to the real-world system and yet it can predict its behavior statistically.
Most other interpretations see the waves as playing some role in determining where the particle in 3D space actually shows up. This is where MWI begins to make no sense: it denies that there ever even is a particle at all and physical reality is just the invisible waves. It does not actually posit that when an observation is made, the wave is reduced to an eigenstate on two different branches of a multiverse. It denies that there is ever a reduction at all.
Imagine a photon hits a beam splitter and has a 50%/50% chance of being reflected/transmitted, and you have two detectors on either side. At the end of the day, you will detect one or the other. But MWI denies that you will detect one or the other. It does not actually posit that the universe literally splits into two branches where you detect one or the other, because if all that exists is the quantum state and the quantum state also never reduces to anything, then neither detectors actually ever enter into an eigenstate where you can say a detection was made.
If you take MWI seriously, then what it is literally doing is denying the entirety of the reality that we observe. Everything we observe is just a lie, and true reality merely consists of a single giant infinite-dimensional wave that exists nowhere, is made of nothing, and nobody can ever see it. But clearly that is not what we perceive in the real-world, so MWI proponents have to claim what we perceive is an "illusion" created by "consciousness," and then will just kick the can down the road and say that the mystery of why what we perceive is nothing like "true" reality is caught up in the "mystery of consciousness" and when we solve that then we will also understand how the "illusion" is created. It doesn't really "solve" anything but just shifts one loaded topic under the umbrella of another.
Tim Maudlin has a good lecture on this problem in particular.
MWI proponents also constantly misrepresents the state of MWI to make it seem more "proven" than it actually is, such as repeatedly making the false claim that it is "simpler" because it deletes the Born rule. The Born rule was not added because it is funny, it was added because it is necessary rule to actually make predictions with the theory, to tie the quantum waves back to what we actually observe. If you delete it, you are left without any ability to derive probabilities, at least without adding another assumption.
Lev Vaidman did a survey of all the attempts to derive the Born rule in the literature and found every single one of them ends up introducing some additional assumption somewhere. They always at some point need to take on an assumption as arbitrary as the Born rule itself. Sean himself published a paper where he tries to develop a "quantum epistemic separability principle" to derive it which is based on doing a partial trace on the universal wave function and treating the diagonal entries in the reduced density matrix as probabilities, yet Richard Dawid and Simon Friederich pointed out in a response paper that there is no coherent justification for his ESP-QM other than it simply being proposed for the purpose of deriving the Born rule, and there is no justification that the diagonals of a reduced density matrix even tell you anything about probabilities unless you're already assuming the Born rule.
You can derive the Born rule through Gleason's theorem, but Gleason's theorem relies on one of its assumptions the idea that the quantum state actually translates to classical probabilities across classical measurement devices. This is obviously something denied in MWI as there are no classical measurement devices, and so Gleason's theorem cannot be used to justify the Born rule for MWI.
There is also an issue with locality. The EPR paper is basically a no-go theorem against local psi-complete interpretations of quantum mechanics. You cannot have a local psi-complete interpretation. MWI proponents may try to say it is "local" in Hilbert space, but this is rather meaningless as locality refers to position in 3D space. Something that is nonlocal is superluminal, it moves through space faster than light, but quantum waves do not "move." They have no position. The concept of locality is hardly relevant to them. If you actually look at the behavior of particles in 3D space, then MWI is manifestly nonlocal. I am not even claiming it being nonlocal is inherently a flaw, but more that they always claim it is local when you just look at the mathematics and it is not meaningfully local in any sense.
Sean also likes to say misleading statements like MWI is just "taking the Schrodinger equation seriously." This plays into a myth pushed by David Deutsch, which I constantly see this fallacy repeated by MWI believers, which is that the only two interpretations are MWI, which says things always evolve according to the Schrodinger equation, or objective collapse models, which say they do not, and since it's trivial to prove that objective collapse models are not mathematically consistent with quantum mechanics, therefore if you just "take the Schrodinger equation seriously" then you must believe in MWI.
But this is fallacious because objective collapse models are incredibly niche and hardly anyone buys into objective collapse models anyways, except maybe Penrose and his crew these days, but it's literally like <1% of academics. No interpretation is an objective collapse model, because objective collapse models necessarily make different predictions, so they fall under the category of a whole different theoretical model. There are like a couple dozen interpretations in the literature and they all "take the Schrodinger equation seriously." Even Copenhagen does not claim that there is literally a physical collapse but treats it as merely epistemic.
Indeed, all interpretations treat the "collapse" as an epistemic measurement update in some way, including even MWI (as you are merely "realizing what branch you're on"). When it actually comes to interpretations, MWI's competition is other interpretations, not objective collapse theories. Poking holes in objective collapse theories doesn't somehow provide evidence that MWI is correct.
Those plastic bags at the grocery store, to put loose fresh produce in? Why the fuck do they never open easily? With all these whizz-bang technologies we've developed, you'd think someone would design/make bags you don't have to wrestle with to open.
paper produce bags enter the chat
I want to bring reusable ones but everything is measured by weight and that fucks up the scale
Yep. We are ruled by idiots.
Weigh the produce before putting it in the bag.
Phil Collins pisses me off, I can’t explain why, I just fucking hate that guy.
A possible reason?
I remember when he was With Genesis. He split to become more commercial. Never liked him since that day.
I’m not even a fan of Genesis. I have no ire towards the band, though, and some of their songs I enjoy, Land of Confusion is a banger, and I don’t know enough of his solo work outside of the Tarzan soundtrack to really have any valid critiques of his musical style and approach. I just want to punch that son of a bitch right in the mouth for some reason. He just triggers a fight response in my dumb monkey brain.
It's Reese's Pieces, not Reesee's peesees.
You're a fucking idiot if you say Reesee's peesees. When have you ever used the term peesees elsewhere, you month breathing dunce?
Month breathing huh?
I done fucked up. I'm leaving it.
If i drink too much i peeseas
Reesee's feces
I was perplexed when I found out this was even a debate, but then I realized one of the participants was an idiot.
Anything text editing not supporting Vim mode, especially programming context.
I was talking with a guy at work the other day about this. Apparently he and I are both guilty of trying to exit insert mode and run vim commands in windows notepad.
I can't even count the amount of times I've sent some variation of "Yeah, so I think we should reboot the server:wq" into irc
banning permanent lights aimed at the sky would allow millions more people to see stars at night with no downsides. but nobody seems to care.
have you not heard of darksky.org?
it's not like no one cares. just not enough
During covid or right after they turned off every other street light to save energy. It was great, they turned them off after 22h or something. Pretty much everyone hated it for no reasons. "It's dangerous for the children." The children that plat on the streets in the middle of the night? It wasn't even pitch black or even close to. We still had more streetlights at only 50% running than many other places.
One of the many benefits of only living in major metropolitan areas.
I wfh so my car is 99% of the time outside my house. It's in the shop for a few days and no one is choosing to park in front of my house! I swear to God they must think I'm a raging hambeast or something, ready to screech out the window if someone parks there. It's not MY spot. I don't own it. Please park there when my car isn't there! So annoying!
😕
Maybe there are simply enough places, and people can park in front of their own houses, so there's no need to park in front of your house?
Okay, if you're looking for weird?
Bad perforations. Drives me insane. Any product that is perforated to tear easily, 9 times out of 10 they fucked it up and the perforations may as well not even be there or even make it worse
My vitamin packets: I try to separate one out but then accidentally tear open another vitamin behind it.
Cardboard food packaging: I start tearing a strip to open but then the strip breaks and leaves 3/4 still stuck on the packaging.
Plastic food packaging: "This bag is resealable!" Or, what they mean to say is that if you try to tear it open using the pre-cut line, you'll tear below the resealable part.
Glass bottles/jars sealed with plastic: You're lucky if you can even tell where they perforated it. Try ruining your nail pulling up every edge you can find until maybe it tears eventually (likely not where the actual perforation is, either). Or you can ruin a knife scratching your own tear against the metal cap instead.
Toilet paper: You'd think the sections that are already partially punctured would be the weakest point to tear most easily, but it's actually the middle of the goddamn sheet, as we all know.
Bonus points for other packages where a top film or foil covering a container is weaker than the glue used to seal it around the edges, so you're left with little bits of lid that can't be removed except surgically with tweezers.
If you can't fucking do food packaging right, save some money by not even trying and just tell me I need to use scissors or a knife, because that's what ends up happening most of the time anyways. Fuck.
I feel so seen today.
Omg, the resealable bags that don't reseal INFURIATE me.
Exactly what I wanted. Good job.
Glass bottles/jars sealed with plastic
Everything listed is valid but this one stands above the rest by a lot personally. Fucking hate this practice.
There's a wonderful bit of fiction writing where an armourer (I think, it's been a while) had that exact thought: paper never tears where the holes are, it only tears between the holes. Therefore, the holes must be stronger than the paper. Therefore, to strengthen a material, add (impervious) holes. Ultimately, the strongest material is all holes.
That ring of glue and plastic and foil on top of bottle caps is so infuriating, gee thanks another wee bit of plastic that could end up in my body accidentally
Any product that is perforated to tear easily, 9 times out of 10 they fucked it up and the perforations may as well not even be there or even make it worse
Interesting — I've always assumed that this was deliberate, in order to increase waste (and thereby sales). Do you really think that it's because of something innocuous like incompetence or inattention?
I love cars. I also love this planet. Cars are bad for the planet.
It said weirdest. This is common and I see it a lot so not weird at all.
I have never felt so seen on the internet!
I love cars and the environment. I really want EVs to be cool / better but we just aren’t there yet.
If ICE cars were banned for everything but racing/recreation I'd be very happy.
Racing series' do not need to make their race cars green. They need to make their logistics fleets green. Race cars need to be able to remain loud and dirty. The sights, sounds, and smells of racing combine to create the majesty that is racing.
I look forward to a future of efficient public transit, no new ICEs on the roads and V12s back in F1.
They still have issues with tire dust, but yeah they're a lot better.
Solar powered cars when?
Didn’t the 2nd gen Prius have a solar roof? It could only power the ac and accessories iirc.
Get an EV. Get a garage charger. Put panels on your roof. The future is now!
How am I supposed to care about a series that takes 4 years between seasons
The only show I ever liked enough for that was Venture Bros, and it was only that bad once.
4 years? What the f do you watch? Three Body Problem?
One Punch Man 😭
I just rewatched this last weekend, immediately thought of it.
Hopefully the new seasons are quality, and therefore worth the wait
Stranger things
Maybe Severance? Was only 3 years between seasons 1 and 2 though.
Random thing I was disappointed by recently. I live near a hospital that has a pizza vending machine near the cafeteria. So whenever I have to go to the hospital for appointments and stuff, I like to get some pizza. I went for an appointment a few days ago but the machine was broken so I didn't get to have pizza.
Bicycle drivetrains keep getting more complex and expensive. A 3x9 drivetrain is beyond adequate, bulletproof, and inexpensive. But NooOoOoOooo, it's nearly impossible to get a quality bike with 3x9 now, without a full custom, DIY build. Everything has to be 1x11/12, which is expensive, touchy, and very particular, all while still lacking the gear range of 3x9.
It all seriously sticks in my craw.
I don't know what this all means, but I do know my son blows through bikes like crazy. The chain always, always get fucked up and falls off. Even with a cover, even if it's a more expensive bike, they don't last.
I had the same bike all my childhood needing nearly no repairs, yet my kids bike is constantly broken.
The root cause of what you describe is a build or maintenance issue. Properly built, tuned, and maintained bikes don't drop chains.
As someone who has a 1x11, all I have to say is:
Push click, push click, push, push... push...
Halleluja! I just want my Deore XT 3x9 back.
I'm sorry, 1x11? I've never really shopped for a bike more expensive than like $500 and the idea of getting less gear options for more money is wild to me.
Who decides when a species becomes naturalized / stops being invasive? As an example, the European Starling has been living in North America since 1890 and are still considered invasive. They have natural predators. The ecosystem is adapting around them. Just let them have citizenship already!
Another thing: Taxonomy. Just all taxonomy. If a shark and a trout are both fish then we must also be fish because both of those animals are closer relatives to us than they are to each other. Obviously the way we define a fish has to change. Why has nobody done this? There are a TON of things like this in taxonomy and that all make me absurdly angry.
Invasive is just a slur for things people don't like. Same thing for weed.
If they weren’t known for taking a single bite out of every fruit on the tree/vine/bush and ruining entire crops/gardens they would be more welcome. * Shakes fist at starlings in the tomato garden *
Also, isn’t the taxonomy thing being addressed with clades and what not?
Yes and no. Clades still have issues with things like hag fish.
Well, fish doesn't really have a scientific meaning... https://youtu.be/uhwcEvMJz1Y
That doesn’t really make it less agitating though. There is a group of birds called jays (like blue jay) and the word jay is scientifically meaningless. It is still infuriating to me that these birds aren’t even vaguely related to each other in many cases. Just name them something else. Make it make sense. Koalas are not bears; just call them koalas. Guinea pigs are not from Guinea and they aren’t pigs. Horned toads are lizards. There are many examples of this. The names of animals don’t have to describe what they are, but they should not be accepted when describing the animal as something it is not. Animals should not have names that conflict with their taxonomy.
There are so many people who are fundamentally wrong about what the Fermi paradox means, and proceed to present their shower thoughts about "what if everyone just, like, decides not to colonize the universe" as if they were profound or novel insights.
Driving an automatic truck. My car is a manual fiat 500, and I've been driving it for a while now and getting used to that. Driving a Nissan titan afterwards feels A) weird, B) wrong C) it's too big D) where's the shifter.
I hate it, but because hubs has a truck whenever I drive not my car it's a nightmare that requires adjustment.
Our prime minister couldn't explain what prime numbers are
They should get appointed as the Composite Minister instead
You and me both brother, you and me both. Fuck Spain, fuck Cortes, fuck Pizarro, and fuck the catholic church. So much history, so much writing lost to these bastards
It really does break my heart knowing so many codices were destroyed. The ones that survived are the neatest comic books ever made and it's such a tragedy so much art was burned.
My favorite ancient culture is only known by the pottery they left behind. There are so many unanswered questions!!!!
I feel this. In my part of the world lived a group of Pre-Columbian archaic people that anthropologists know very little about about aside their burial customs, some stone and bone tools, and the foods they likely ate.
Moche, Wari, etc.? I'm an Anthropology nerd, what are you digging?
Gotta be the moche sex pots, right!?
I'm annoyed the tomatoes went from growing good to growing Very Sad
This is on me, and it is my first time planting and I mostly went "eeehhhh I think this is good"
I did my goal, which was get from seed to red tomato.
But now there's fungal infections, end rot, armyworm moths, splitting skin, and general sadness.
I did get enough to make salsa though.
I feel our ancestors spirits because I'm sure they felt the same way about farming.
I'm annoyed that I was born in the armpit of history. There are people alive who were alive when the Wright Brothers were. And we can see a shining future ahead of us. But we're stuck in the middle. Too late to be excited for all the progress of the first flight, moon landing, dawn of the internet. Too early for commercial space flight, nuclear fusion, full dive VR, true AI.
We can see those things in the future. It's being built now. But by the time it's fully available and normalized we'll either be dead or too old to care. If capitalism doesn't kill us all with climate change.
So yeah. Armpit of history. Shit sucks.
Every generation could say something similar
I get a bit frustrated sometimes to see stars and think of the universe burning away it's entropy without anyone putting it to useful ends, like most of the universe going to waste before anyone can even reach it.
In the context of the universe as a whole, what even is "useful"? Maybe its just here to shine bright for a few trillion years and that's all it needs to be. Art doesn't need to be useful.
If human history tells us anything its that we'd somehow suck the beauty out of it all in the name of profit.
I'm not really a nihilist or anything but it seems like almost anything we touch turns to shit. I'm all for colonizing the moon and Mars and making use of the asteroid belt but on bigger scales, maybe its better off to just sit back and enjoy the view?
I tend towards a variation on utilitarianism, from that point of view energy in a finite universe that could be used to support intelligent life in some way, but isnt, is unethical, and while that might not really demand much action from us right now given that space development is a very, very long term project by nature and we're already working on developing the most basic forms of the requisite technology, it still seems a bit frustrating to lose that which we cannot reach. Its not just us either, statistically speaking it should be extremely unlikely for life and advanced intelligence to occur once, but only once, so I take it as a given that theres more out there somewhere, but evidently it cant be that common or else hasnt gotten much further than us, given all the stars we can see out there.
I dont really think everything we touch turns to shit, I just think we judge ourselves much more harshly than we judge "natural" things. I dont really care that much if the people that go off to the stars do so because of some desire to harvest them for some kind of profit or put up a space-mcdonalds at alpha centauri or whatever, as long as someone goes. Obviously I would prefer they build a nicer society there than just a rehash of what we have here right now, but in my view even the crappiest society is preferable to a dead rock or inanimate clump of gas, even if it is an aesthetically pleasing rock. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder as they say, and I think we can make beautiful things, or failing that, and least find the beauty in what we do make, if we try.
Imagine all the cool planets that'll never be observed
without anyone putting it to useful ends
You never know; we might be a car battery.
Yeah but that's justifiable (and existential).
HBO never finished Carnivale.
Doctor Who losing Ncuti Gatwa and facing an uncertain production future.
wasnt he kinda of a weak link, i think people are also upset what they did to the previous doctor, whittaker.
I'm still mad at Yahoo for killing xFire with a frivolous lawsuit.
xFire was better 20 years ago than Discord is today. We had a real gem stolen from us.
You sound like me, except for me it's Google Plus.
The cancellation of Bosch: Legacy
I'm upset that there haven't been many Disney+ original movies this year. 2022 had a ton of them, they've really slowed down since the writer's strike
I'm also upset that Disney takes so long to announce when recent theatrical movies will be coming to Disney+. Thunderbolts is coming this Wednesday but they didn't announce it til like a week ago and I still don't know when Elio is coming.
Can't believe people don't have shame in liking whatever disney shits out.
its either MCU or Star wars, not much of the og ones or non-mcu, or SWCU.
The foxwq client isn't free software. It is a great injustice.
Shit observational comedians harvesting this thread for material