Huh? How did you go from "people should have equal opportunities" to lynching and firing pregnant women? At this point you're just saying whatever you want.
Plus, lmao at the hypocrisy of calling DEI a "boogeyman" while simultaneously accusing anyone disagreeing with you a racistsexistlyncher. It's totally real, you're proving it yourself.
hmm interesting. Will take a look.
The reason they don't want you to unlock your bootloader is because of security....
...security of their revenue stream, that is.
I guess if he's getting paid to do the interviews then it's technically passive... wait no, then the whole interviewer thing would just count as advertising for his vending machine business
If you really want to piss people off, try adding "...and animals" to the list of things you care about.
Hey, a UBI supporter! Just curious, how can UBI be implemented in a way that doesn't result in hyperinflation? If a society was to ration out food/shelter/necessities directly, I understand how that would work. But if it's done through the intermediary of money, what would prevent the economy from entering an arms race where the producers raise prices to adapt to the new purchasing power of the population, and the government raises the UBI to keep up with the rising prices?
Assistance implies that it is temporary,
Not it does not. Ever heard of "aim assist"? "Assisted living"? "assistive touch" (the iOS feature)? I don't see how any of these are temporary.
But yeah the correct solution is indeed to change the system. There will always be naysayers who argue that "no one system can suit everybody" so I guess we'll need a system of systems.
Batshit analogies like these that simultaneously make sense and don't is what I'm here for. Amazing.
They don’t actually believe any of this shit.
I agree with everything else that you're saying, but I wouldn't be so sure about this. Have you ever noticed how it's much easier to start online flame wars when you actually believe in the batshit stance that you're arguing as opposed to pretending to believe it for the sake of trolling? I think it's a similar thing here. I don't think humans are that good at compartmentalising, so in order to do something performatively so often and so well you have to trick your mind into actually believing it in a sort of corrupt way. I know this makes me sound like a middleschooler, but I think George Orwell's concept of doublethink is very much real in cases like these.
When people say that they are “anti-DEI” in the US, they mean that they want a society where the only people with power are white, protestant men.
Source: trust me bro
Is it really that implausible that some people really do just want to have diversity, inclusion, and equity the "old way" by simply giving everyone an equal opportunity to participate instead of embracing DEI ideology? It's a huge leap in logic to just assume that anyone who doesn't subscribe to some specific ideology that claims to be tolerant must secretly be opposed to tolerance itself. I think all of those people yelling "nazi" at anyone remotely critical of DEI are just projecting.
Jesus christ people in the comments here are pathetic. This clearly has nothing to do with racial slurs or otaku culture. It's a play on the totally normal english word "tycoon" which just means "very rich businessman" and "mogul" which is a synonym for "magnate". You can look these up, every half-decent dictionary has these words. They probably changed it because "coon" is a slur for black people and they didn't want to cause any misunderstandings. If any of this offends you, please, please just step outside, touch some grass, take a deep breath, relax.
you can just send the money to the artist if indeed your objective is to “contribute to the artist” no NFTs required
Yeah, people could donate directly, but some people decided to buy NFTs instead, and they wouldn't have spent the money otherwise.
^
|
This is my logic which shows that my post is not bullshit. My post is only bullshit by the "logic" that you try to introduce.
And you don't need to be writing these long-winded paragraphs. The point stands that you're the one who brought up the argument about NFTs as means of ownership and then started arguing on the opposing side. Who are you arguing against? There is no-one on the proposing side, only the starmen you put there.
You're putting words in my mouth. I didn't say shit about "rights" and "respect". The guy in the original comment mentioned nothing about it either. You said that. You're bringing this idea into the conversation and then arguing against yourself. Seriously, what is your endgame here?
I genuinely have no clue what you think I "read on a website" about NFTs. To set the record straight, my understanding of NFTs is that you have a ledger where your public key is associated with a token short string of characters, and every computer participating in the ledger agrees on that. that's it. All of these ideas of "ownership" and "rights" and societal analogies is bullshit you brought into the conversation.
damn those 17 downvotes are so salty it's making my monitor bezels corrode
yeah exactly I still haven't heard a single explanation of what makes NFTs a "scam". People just shout that word and expect you to accept it. Seriously, which part of a consensual transaction between two well-informed parties qualifies as a "scam"?
bruh it's really not that difficult. Fan sends money to artist. Fan receives some magical bytes in return. Could fan have right clicked and downloaded the artwork without paying? Of course. But fan wants to support artist. Because fan likes artist's art. It's how any digital "marketplace" works, NFT or not. All this "legal system" and "ownership" and "legal registrar" nonsense you're pulling up is completely irrelevant. You're reading too much into it.
I mean yeah like you can be a pedant about it but all in all its a statement that makes sense. Apps on both android and ios are very sandboxed, even if you go out of your way to install malware there's very limited damage it can do, barring zerodays in the sandboxing itself.
Gosh I really don't like this art style but it's better than whatever I can draw so whatever.
Huh, this person doesn't like starbucks
They must be autistic
Peak .world behavior right there
Convenience? The fuck are you talking about?? Have you never heard of soluble coffee? I carry a jar of soluble coffee in my backpack when I go to uni. They have those instant water boiling taps on every floor in my faculty building, I can make myself a mug just like that. Is it good? No. But certainly better than starbucks.
But whatever, I'm not going to argue with someone who's trying to convince me that the thing I do almost every day with no issues is actually impossible.


Explanation for newbies: setuid is a special permission bit that makes an executable run with the permissions of its owner rather than the user executing it. This is often used to let a user run a specific program as root without having sudo
access.
If this sounds like a security nightmare, that's because it is.
In linux, setuid is slowly being phased out by Capabilities. An example of this is the ping
command which used to need setuid in order to create raw sockets, but now just needs the cap_net_raw
capability. More info: <https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/382771/why-does-ping-need-setuid-permission>. Nevertheless, many linux distros still ship with setuid executables, for example passwd
from the shadow-utils
package.


Explanation for newbies: The GNU/Linux copypasta is an argument made by Richard Stallman that the operating system should be referred to as "GNU/Linux" or "GNU+Linux" because linux is just the kernel and what makes it useful are the various GNU programs and libraries like coreutils and glibc.
Alpine Linux is a linux distribution that ships without any GNU software (though it can be installed using the package manager).


Explanation for newbies:
-
Shell is the programming language that you use when you open a terminal on linux or mac os. Well, actually "shell" is a family of languages with many different implementations (bash, dash, ash, zsh, ksh, fish, ....)
-
Writing programs in shell (called "shell scripts") is a harrowing experience because the language is optimized for interactive use at a terminal, not writing extensive applications
-
The two lines in the meme change the shell's behavior to be slightly less headache-inducing for the programmer:
set -euo pipefail
is the short form of the following three commands:set -e
: exit on the first command that fails, rather than plowing through ignoring all errorsset -u
: treat references to undefined variables as errorsset -o pipefail
: If a command piped into another command fails, treat that as an error
export LC_ALL=C
tells other programs to not do weird things depending on locale. For example, it forcesseq
to output numbers with a period as the decimal separator, even on systems where coma is the default decimal separator (russian, dutch, etc.).
-
The title text references "posix", which is a document that standardizes, among other things, what features a shell must have. Posix does not require a shell to implement
pipefail
, so if you want your script to run on as many different platforms as possible, then you cannot use that feature.


Screenshot sources:
- <https://lemmy.world/post/21863843?scrollToComments=true>
- <https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/4997189>


It's funny when armchair experts insist that the fediverse won't catch on because "federation is too hard to understand" when arguably the most widespread communication system on the internet follows the same model