That explains it.

That is a rough looking 40.

40 on each leg
- Damn, 120 years in total
That's the Fart Monster 2k.
He's been telling that story for years
That's because the teenager who actually runs that account has no idea what 40 looks like.

Truly, sometimes the simplest explanation is the truest.

Akhem’s blazer
- Alzheimer’s laser

Judge him all you want but he tells it like it is

- I mean fear of the unknown is stronger than fear of the known in most cases.
- The real post is always in the comments
I, TOO WOULD LIKE PICTURES OF BOOBS IN MY INBOX!
- Did that work?

Guess I'm the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.

That's a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
- Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
- You're not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)

Fart monster two k telling it like it is

To Dr. Iver Mectin

🇲🇦‼️ Older men following young women

✅👌 On instagram

I always find it peculiar and proof of self-hatred that humans are so averse and judgemental about reveling in our sexuality.

It's a major part of who we all are, whether we choose to deny that or not. Cultures and world religions always run by monied interests would prefer we spend our time miserable collecting more for their dragon hoard piles as they live in hyper-decadent debauchery, and most of us have been too fucked in the head with sexual and "don't be laaaazy" shame to be fixable, but humanity would have been so much happier if we spent less time sacrificing ourselves to the God of economic metastasis and more time fucking, especially in an age of birth control.

We might not even have put ourselves on the express lane to self-extinction we're currently careening down in search of more treasure for the masters.

Sex is free, fun, and everyone can do it. We can't have that in capitalism, why would people work for money?
I think the issue is, when reveling in your sexuality, everyone involved must consent. It's hard to say whether posting pics of you in revealing clothes is consent for old men to ogle or not. I'd say if you post it publicly, then it should be fine for said old men to respectfully ogle. But if said old men decide to comment something like, "would love to squirtle on those jigglypuffs" on the revealing image, we're suddenly entering nonconsensual territory. So there's a fine line and it's easy to cross. Simply loving looking at boobs on the internet is fine; many women enjoy being admired. But if you take it any further, that's when problems arise. Enjoy your sexuality responsibly, my friends. 💕
Edit: it's both extremely telling and extremely concerning how much my rational take on consent is triggering all these pathetic men.
- If you don't want people spreading your images, wanking to your images, making crude comment about your images, oogling your images, etc etc. And I don't mean just nudes, I mean any picture you post...
  Then don't post them online.
  because once they hit the internet, in any capacity, you've lost all control of them, forever. They will still be there to be discovered when you are lying in a nursing home at 104 years old, Your descendants so far removed that they dont even know your name will still be at risk of stumbling upon them. People on the other side of the planet might use it in advertising or virtual sex dolls without you ever knowing.
  You might not like it, you might not want it, you might not consent to it, but its still going to happen.
  And if you want it to not happen, don't post things online. Because not posting is the only control you'll ever be able to exert over them.
- Put something on a public platform = accept that people will look at it. Allow for people to comment on it and you invite these comments. If someone wants to post pictures and not get comments on them, they can post them to a platform that doesn't allow comments.
- Edit: it’s both extremely telling and extremely concerning how much my rational take on consent is triggering all these pathetic men.
  Your initial comment was rational, it was well-thought out and you made a fair point while ending the comment on a positive note. Left alone, I would have upvoted your well-considered opinion and moved on.
  However, your follow up responses and your edit were unprovoked ad hominem sexist attacks where you assume everyone who disagrees is a mansplaining penis-wielder whose words have less value than your own. While having your views challenged can be confronting, responding in the manner you are only detracts from your argument.
economic metastasis
Love it
After I quit porn, I became more sensitive to the minds and souls of women, and now my sexual attraction can flow to a desire for the women being happy.
This may seem counterintuitive if you have an addiction involving lust, but I am now more completely reveling in my sexuality.
There are a non-insignificant number of people in society who can't seem to handle the concept of consent. Then we have an ever growing number of incels awkward enough in relationships and socially that they can't talk about sexual topics without becoming angry and violent.
A lot of our societal taboos about sexuality are trying to keep those people at bay.
It's a mental health problem to be sure and it needs to be handled in society but it is rarely actually worked that way. It's easier in some countries to make women hide away than it is too deal with the men that are out of control.
We really as a race can't revel in our sexuality until we manage to get our morality under control.
- You're treating the symptoms as the causes dude. If we had more open discussion about these things I don't think such issues would be as commonplace.
  If people understood more of what victims of rape go through, they're much less likely to view consent as a hazy line.
  I go to many places where sexuality is celebrated rather than shamed and because of that it's much less of a big deal. At one music festival I went to there were coed communal showers. I was kind of nervous but I headed down. Got in there and everybody was laughing and singing, sudsing each other up with soap, etc. This wasn't because it was some kind of huge orgy, but rather that everybody was comfortable with the nudity and we were having fun together in a totally non sexual way, in my opinion only made possible by the openness everybody had about sexuality there.
  We are sexual creatures (except ace people), ain't no two ways about it. Keeping sex taboo does nothing to prevent the problems you're describing. It's like the Islamic extremists who think the only way to protect women is by taking away their rights, making their beauty a taboo, etc. And still, these places have their own problems with rape anyway, so clearly that doesn't work.

I don’t follow any of them yet they still flood my instagram „search“ tab.

Not that I complain.

Do you get constant targeted ads for devices to keep leaves out of your gutters? All I seem to get are those, belts and fat men t-shirt ads.
- The algorithm is working as intended!
- Yes belly old man T-shirts are the worst as I’m working hard on NOT having a belly and this like like saying „fuck you you gonna get it regardless, that’s what algorithm already knows“
I'm 50 and get posts from OnlyFans accounts and advertising for kegels exercises, mixed in with woodworking videos. I blame all the other men out there. No wonder I don't use social media much anymore. I just want to see my friend's and family's pics/vids.

Men liking pictures of beautiful women is not weird. I think it's weirder that our economic system incentivizes selling empty sexuality and even emptier engagement from consumers of it.

Something tells me she's not a real doctor.

she starts and ends with doctor, she's a double doctor if you will
Well damn, I didn't notice the first time.
- I once got an online rectal exam from a Dr. Pepper and he turned out to be fake. I no longer use doctors on twitter
I am
- Well you're a nerd!

Men following attractive women. So weird.

Let people like what they like, whether it's looking at girls online, cosplay, sports, or being an insufferable cunt on social media.

Boobs.

Dopamine receptors that aren't severely down-regulated.

I wish more women in their late 40s showed pictures of their boobs so I can follow them. Because even MILF porn is like women who are maybe 40 most of the time and I'm attracted most to women my age. I just am.

"mature" is the search term you're looking for.
- There's precious little of that too. Unless maybe if I want to pay for it. And paying for porn on the internet?

I thinks it's weird when people choose to make their online profiles open to the public then get upset when people view their content.

Dr Iver Mectin

This is a good bit.

FART MONSTER TWO K

I don’t really see how wives following a bunch of young women is weird, they often socialize quite a bit with each other.

Same answer for why dudes constantly channel flip... looking for boobs.

They invented capitalism because boob hoarding was inefficient.

It seems people in the comments here missed the "with wives" part. Generally speaking, your wife is not going to be terribly pleased with you ogling or getting off to other women. And violating that is what makes these men count as weird.

So glad my wife is not like that
- Mutual agreement "look ok, but no touch" is perfect.

I'm practically 40 and that guy looks older than my dad

these dudes aren’t weird, they’re sadly very common

Do you think most of these young women wish that these older men would stop following them?
- how can i know, im not them
You almost had it
Why sadly?
They get clicks, their viewers get off, everyone wins.

Lol, thumbnail pic of "FartMonster"... that's a real hard 40 years. Dude looks near 70.

"...because I objectify young women and I like it."

There's got to be some kind of line between "objectifying young women" and "horny".
- I mean, the statement "those young women, or many of them" is already pretty objectifying. But I also question what he can mean. Is it random selfies taken by women? Is it just seeing women's bodies devoid of context and sexualizing them? Because that unquestionably would be objectifying, yeah.
How is this downvoted? Dude literally admits to creeping on women's profiles so he can ogle their photos. How is he any different from old school weirdos who would whack it to Sports Illustrated?
This isn't someone admitting to enjoying porn (which is still a problematic industry in itself but that's another, more complex, issue). It is someone admitting to looking at regular photos on women's profiles and fantasizing about their tits.
That's textbook objectification of women.
- What's wrong with whacking it to sports illustrated? Who is being harmed?
- Oh, look, a straw feminist. Haven't seen one of those in awhile.

The maddest of lads

Seems less weird when you put it that way

Men lust after women and women lust after men. Hating one another for that is ridiculous and denies that reality.

Women are simply more selective, but their jaws tend to drop to the floor and their gazes tend to linger into creepy lengths of time over a Hugh Jackman bod or a broad shouldered designer suit that screams high net worth.

Its quite sad that people can't except one another as imperfect animals with biological baggage.

SWEET GOD BY DEMON DEMON HOW IS THE TEXT COLORED LIKE THAT