🚨RADICAL COMMUNIST🚨

that's satire, right? has to be. please. "unemployed minors", that's just a fancy phrase for "children" who ARE IN SCHOOL

"taxes on couches"
- The question stands 😂
- You mean "fun money"
The taxing of couches is legit!
- What about renting for an hour?
  Asking for a friend.

My single favorite report was on this one.

Misleading title, it's not clear this is a parody post.

For those that don't know, it's a parody.

It is obvious because of "couches", but apart from that, it could have been 100% Fox "News".
Making parodies in modern times is a difficult business. You make up a joke, just to see that reality just overtook you with the pedal to the metal.
- It sucks that I was unsure at "unemployed minors," because the party is overtly pro-child labor and that bad at optics.
Honestly the only thing that threw me off is taxes on couches. Otherwise I would've thought this was real
- That was where I figured it out too.
- Nah I was completely ready to believe that Fox News would take a joke Walz made about couches (which I knew he did) and claim it was an assault on money and freedom.
I really can't tell with this reality anymore
I honestly didn't believe you until I saw the "Tax on corporate profits, couches"

It's fake, a repost from a "humor" Reddit post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/1empggg/tim_walzs_radical_democrat_agenda_for_america/

Did they just change the list? I'm not sure what to think if the ~~title~~ headline is accurate or not.
- I'd say it's innacurate.
  TBH I reported it. I think the title should at least suggest its a parody, though I'm not sure if OP knows it is.

Is that a real screen? Some of those seem mask off even by Fox's standards.

No
Gotta think about it because the ‘right’ ‘wing’ is pretty weird and fox is a fire in a bin outside a Gregs in Rotherham but no, the couch fucker tax is a giveaway.

I feel like this could be on fox news and they would lap it up.

I feel like this will be shared uncritically by people who sincerely oppose women having "unsupervised female health decisions" et al.

The wingnuts are so messed up I had to read this twice and really try to reassure myself it wasn't real.

I realized when I got to "couches."
- I could tell by "LGBTQIA+" and "Rights", also the phrasing of the medical care one.

Stop it, stop it. I already like the guy. Geez. But really, great joke.

Meanwhile Trump is proudly sharing clips of his promise to start the largest mass deportations in the history of the country.

Both sides though.

'...unemployed minors...'

taxes on corporate profits, couches
- This is when I realized it wasn't real.
- I laughed out loud at the couches, which combined with rampant lgbtq + rights makes it cleary a joke.

I mean, it's obviously fake, but on the other hand, it's disturbingly close to something they'd actually show to rile up their not-so-smart-or-empathetic viewers.

if "tampon tim" is an actual thing in their toolbox, then literally anything could be

You are really skirting the edge of Poe's Law here. Not sure you could cut it any finer.

I rarely see anything Fox says for about two decades, and I've felt much better ever since.

No fucking way the couches part is real

I see what you did there.

Free advertising is free advertising.

This isn't weird at all, lol 😝🔨

I feel like they intentionally fucked with the kerning on the font in his name to give the illusion that it looks Cyrillic.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, is this a tankee???

Not to totally shit on everyone's parade (because this is going to get hate from everyone probably), but not that far off. The term tankie was used as an insult to leftists who defended communist dictatorship's use of tanks to attack (and kill) protesters. Walz did deploy the national guard to attack protesters during the George Floyd protests. Not a tank though as far as I'm aware.
- Walz confirmed tanki. Kamala has the leftist vote on lock.

This picture is just oozing with WINNING. From the points made, to that bottom right where the economy is up.

Whoever thought this was on Brand for Fox must have gotten canned.

These stats mean absolutely nothing and give zero context with how you've presented them, and you couldn't be bothered to clean up your comment when you copy/pasted or give a link so others could follow.
How does this compare to the average increase of debt in other states? What kind of increase in budget did his programs add compared to other programs states initiate? What kind of impact or votes did Walz conduct that actually affected the budget and in what years?
Debt increases, we get no new programs. Minnesota's debt increases, they get free school lunches, healthcare products, etc etc. Not really a convincing argument presented here or anything to even have a conversation about.