I would love to hear the insulting memorial speech he gives her. Throw a few jokes in there, insult her family, laugh about how it's good it wasn't him. You know the norm.
Yes, we sold them a license. The jihadists also bought one.
Despite his lack of recpect, we are even willing to sell a license to president Trump. He will appreciate our proprietary methods of air travel. Not a single foreigner has spoken a bad word about them. In fact, not a single passenger has spoken a bad word about them. :)
Why is no one talking about the big achievements of this administration? Since January 20, no one has been eating the dogs, eating the cats, eating the pets of the people that live in Ohio.
She should prove that she would do it, and the only way to do it would be to set up a realistic scenario in which someone is taking a shot at Trump and she jumps in front of him. Everything else is just bragging or idle speculation.
Well... not a great point but at least a semi-valid point. It's just so surprising since Loomer is one of the few people I'd count as stupider than Trump.
Her arguments have nothing to do with the right reasons, she's just using that one trick she knows (racism) to support her view. Constitution? Bribery? Conflicts of interest? Nowhere to be found. She implies it could be ok from other nations
Her tweeting this only highlights how dumb she is - does she actually believe Trump cares about anything she said, or has any sort of principles or values guiding his actions, other than "me, me, me" ?
Most of the others in Trumps orbit know better and just smile and nod, until it's their turn to glaze, they don't expect any sort of consistency or coherence in his positions. They understand the game, the Dear Leader is infallible, no matter what.
This just seems like a desperate cry for attention from someone who likely feels their access and influence slipping.
And she says this - not because it's wrong for a president to take gifts from a foreign power for any of a thousand different reasons that come to any normal, rational, reasonable person's mind.
No, none of that, it's that the foreign power are "jihadists." If not for that, they'd be in the clear.
Look, most people are grey. There’s a slide bar on the dipshit meter. Loomer is very far on the side of dipshit, but there’s rarely a 100% with people on any sliding bar metric.
It’s never all inclusive. Accepting that she’s correct on this point is fine. It doesn’t make her any more correct on other things she’s said. No shame.
Funding Mexican cartels to help smuggle jihadists across the border.
I'm not sure what she thinks Jihad means, but it probably doesn't mean what she thinks it does. Are the South American mothers and their children you are tracking down through the IRS because they pay taxes and are working for a living and trying to get their kids into school and put food on the table for them.... Are those the Jihadists she speaks of?
If she believes it to be struggling to get through life and acting in what they believe is the right thing to do, then she would be right.
If she believes it is supposed to be a holy war or some shit, Hispanic families trying to feed their families is not a holy war.
Either she is mistaken about what she is calling the struggles of these people, or she is admitting she is actively trying to deport families just trying to do the right things in life and get by.
Yeah I knew someone born pre-2000s whose legal first name was literally "Jihad." Similar to Isis (as in the Egyptian mother goddess), it's a name that has since gained some negative connotations. But iirc the way this guy described it is that it means "fighting the good fight" so-to-speak and could refer to literal physical fighting but could also refer to like, researching the cure for cancer. It's any great undertaking that is perceived to benefit the world in some way, and they wouldn't even be the first to apply that line of thinking to violently zealous evangelism.
Wow, I guess she can't believe she blew a man who wants to accept bribes from foreign jihadists. Does he know there are tons of white people to take bribes from? That's the issue, right?
I wonder why Iranian proxies kill US service members. Such deep, far-reaching conundrums are way beyond plebians like me, but it someone were to attempt to find an answer to this question, I'd assume that they'd first try to figure out why the hell US service members are in areas where Iranian proxies operate.