Mozilla has fired Chief Product Officer Steve Teixeira after cancer diagnosis

It's truly wild how hard of a heel turn mozilla has taken. I'm going to cancel my recurring donations to them, and get off all of their products.

People are digging up a bunch of old shit right now
- September 18, 2024 is "old shit"?
- It’s obviously orchestrated
holy shit you donated money to these wackos?
with so many OOS projects out there in need of funding, so many devs roughing it up, you donate to the advertising company Mozilla that has zero cash needs, they give million dollar bonuses to their executives every year.
Literally giving money to wacko rich executives
Why would you donate to a company? I assume you are talking about the non profit

It's almost like they are intentionally trying to get in trouble.

I feel like the CEO of Mozilla is paid by Google to be as fucking stupid as possible.
- I hope discovery finds something obvious to this effect, or we're all going to have a bad time in the near future
- Fucking stop with this conspiracy theory already, i'm reading it for the third time this thread. As if CEOs can't make bad decisions and there has to be a "realll11" reason.
deleted by creator

Ok wtf is Moxilla doing? They know their company is built on good community perception, right?

They honestly have a monopoly in the sense that they are the only think not Chrome
I mean they've been pedaling AI crap for a while without negative backlash.
Similarly they tried to ride the Blockchain train back in the crypto scam days and also didn't face any backlash.
They've publicly vouched to become an AI company and an advertising company without backlash.
I think most Firefox users don't care
- I think most Firefox users don’t care
  Oh we care, but there's no alternative besides Chrome and Safari and those companies are even worse (Google definitely is, anyway, Apple is debatable)
  Luckily there's still alternatives like Librewolf that unfortunately still use Mozilla's browser engine.
  I do hope the Servo project will be ready to use in a production browser soon.
- What they mean with AI features is also their offline website translation feature, which is something I've wanted for years. The alternative is online Google website translation.
- Honestly a lot of Firefox users are eyeing forks
- They are a Silicon Valley-based foundation half-heartedly rehashing Silicon Valley's worst trends.
  The truth is, you have to do these sorts of things to attract and retain talent, even if they aren't great ideas.
The users most likely to complain are also the users least likely to stop using their products.

Jesus isn't rule number one of an employee suing you is to NOT FIRE THEM?

Seriously Monty Burns did this. Monty fucking burns. A cartoon villain

*Monte Carlo
- Season 2 - Bart gets hit by a car. Bart gets hit by Mr Burns while skateboarding. Homer uses Lionel Hutz to sue his employer, Mr Burns for 1 million dollars. On receiving notice, Mr Burns tells Smithers to fire Homer. Smithers asks "Do you think that's wise, sir? Think of the headlines"

I genuinely believe that the Mozilla board is secretly working for Google. They already get most of their funding from that search engine deal, is a backroom agreement to slowly run the organization into the ground in order to force the last holdouts over to Chrome that hard to believe?

Don't ascribe intention where incompetence is enough.
- It's better to treat incompetence as maliciousness, than to treat maliciousness as incompetence.
  The benefit of the doubt should only apply in the absence of a longstanding pattern of behavior to the contrary.
  IMO Mozilla has run out of goodwill.
- Exactly
  They are just good at burning money and getting nothing done
It's in Google's interest to keep Firefox/Mozilla alive to skirt antitrust laws, so any backdoor deal would be more making Chrome alternatives not look too attractive while keeping them on life support.
I don't think they're working for Google but I'm convinced that they're trying to setup their own advertising business
Trying to get some of that sweet ad revenue money
but Google controls so much of everything that of course they're indirectly funded by Google, so it may look like they're working for Google
In this Tecnofeudalist reality that we live in, we all indirectly work for our feudal lords Google / Meta / Amazon. We are granted their grace and allowed to exist in their server space and use their internet cables. In return we have to work the land and give our data as a tribute.

I just canceled my MDN Plus subscription. Man, Mozilla has been so disappointing recently. I have to wonder if Google infiltrated them or something.

They are just really poorly managed
- Sure, but it’s worth asking why the management is so poor. Many people have theorized that it’s because Google is pulling the strings; It would be in Google’s best interest to keep Firefox around on life support, because it helps them avoid antitrust lawsuits if they can point to Firefox and go “nope not every browser is Chromium based!” But it’s also in Google’s best interest to whittle Firefox’s usage down to near zero, which is what every single recent Mozilla decision has been aiming to do.
  Mozilla was getting paid a lot of money by Google before Google got their hand slapped in an antitrust lawsuit. Many people have theorized that since that lawsuit, Google has pivoted to making deals directly with Mozilla’s management instead.

EEO court here we come

Are they TRYING to speedrun losing their credibility?

If Mozilla really starts to go downhill, what are the chances we get a Linux kernel-style community fork that we can rely on instead? Curious why that hasn't happened before -- perhaps because Mozilla has always toed the line of not-quite-awful enough?

I just hope we can keep an alternative browser engine alive. Would be nice if some rich person would just set up a funding model that can pay a few devs to keep it going indefinitely without ads or spyware.

Because developing and maintaining an entire browser is a huge task. That's why we don't see much competition in browsers (I mean independent browsers). Also Mozilla isn't doing that bad, the browser is still really good. It's not the technical side that is a problem, its mostly marketing and the image of Mozilla.
Librewolf is kind of like that. It pulls a lot from Tor
It’s one thing to tweak a browser that comes in kit form from Mozilla’s code. It’s another thing altogether to continue maintaining it if Firefox ever dies. I don’t know if any of these clones have the kind of teams needed to do all the work Mozilla have done for them.
Funny enough
Though with a target of 2026...
- Its also sadly maintained by transphobic weirdos
- Have you seen the amount of web standards? HTML5 by itself is huge
Don't you like the Ladybird Browser and the browser based in Servo projects as alternatives?
They're literally happening right now, not ready for prime time but with continued development and support they'll become usuable
Check out AlternativeTo
I've been thinking of different browsers as well, but not sure which. Probably LibreWolf.
Def not Chrome or Safari though.

deleted by creator
- It's because the devs just don't want to. Not really sure why, would be good to have that kind of interoperability.

Prolonged, multi-level fuckery with dozens of witnesses - and that's just with what they did to this one guy.

Teixeira worked for nearly 14 years at Microsoft in areas including developer tools and technologies, before serving as Facebook’s director of program management and design, and Twitter’s vice president of product.

According to the suit, Teixeira joined Mozilla in August 2022 with the understanding that he would ultimately be positioned to succeed Baker as Mozilla CEO.

[...]

Teixeira, 52, was diagnosed in October 2023 with ocular melanoma, a rare but treatable form of cancer. He took an approved 90-day medical leave through early February under the Family Medical Leave Act, the suit says.

Shortly before Teixeira returned, in early February, Baker stepped down as CEO, returning to the role of executive chairman. Chambers, a Mozilla board member, was named to serve as CEO for the remainder of the year.

So he's basically fine, he just missed his chance to become CEO.

https://www.geekwire.com/2024/mozillas-product-chief-sues-the-firefox-maker-alleging-discrimination-after-cancer-diagnosis/

deleted by creator
- I have met Steve at Ms several times, and he always seemed like a nice and genuinely motivated person. He seemed to like product challenges and even took on hard tasks like leading the core team of Windows 8.1 App enablement ( think of getting Facebook to create a Windows native app). I'd believe him that Mozilla treated him wrongly or asked unfair things of him, otherwise he wouldn't need to take these steps.
In the post OP linked from Teixeira, he claims they terminated his employment.

Right so what browser should I use now??? 😡

Another org may fork popular software like Firefox, like OpenOffice vs libre office for example.
In the meantime we're going full text interfaces by 2030 to save cycles for the env, https://man.archlinux.org/man/lynx.1.en /s

Stupid move posting about it publicly while the case is still open.

Yeah I don't know how this is in other countries but over here that can seriously damage your case as the other party can claim your motivation is fame (and hence money), not justice. You generally never do this, and it's one of the things lawyers are very serious and strict about.