Transgender, nonbinary and disabled people more likely to view AI negatively, study shows
Transgender, nonbinary and disabled people more likely to view AI negatively, study shows
Sounds like confirmarion bias.
I'd like to know the industry sector they are working in.
I'd say a high amount of them work in Tech and IT.
Opposed people, or today who know what it's like to be oppressed, are more likely to recognize oppression.
AI is going to fuck us all at this rate. It's already begun. People are losing their jobs.
Losing jobs is just the tip of the iceberg, individualized, friendly mass manipulation is where the shit hits the fan in a whole new way
That's because they're all on lemmy
Knowledge based fields were historically a “safe space” for queer and disabled people. If you are just super fucking smart and could be a wizard in a programming language, or were a genius physicist, you could get to the point where you were too valuable to fire for being trans or disabled. I may be trans and an unperson in the place I live, but I can do calculus, and there’s no way they can take that away from me.
There’s an attack on knowledge itself going on right now. A desire by the rich to control information. They want to force us into an unreality where skill and knowledge are meaningless. This hurts people who are socially marginalized, because it takes away one of our few paths for economic survival.
It goes with the attacks on DEI. What they want is a tool that can replace the need for talent, so that they can select who gets to have jobs. They want all jobs to be Graeber’s “bullshit jobs” so that skill is meaningless and they can allot them out to the people they think “deserve” them.
What kinda bullshit narrative is this?
In the words of Miyazaki:
Whoever creates this stuff has no idea what pain is whatsoever. I am utterly disgusted. If you really want to make creepy stuff, you can go ahead and do it. I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all. I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself.
It's mathematically an insult to life itself. It changes evolution in human societies to reduce dissent and diversity of thought. And evolution is important in the sense that to stay on one place you have to run very fast.
So it's sort of a tool for regress. Honestly - similar to the Web itself. It was intended as a hypertext system for scientists. For social interaction there were e-mail and e-news.
I'm thinking - I thought always that Sun is a very cool company, but at the same time they are also the ones who've popularized this messy understanding of the future in which, with some commercial adjustments by today's big tech, we still live. And that understanding was highly centralist, sort of a digital empire.
Only corporate executives benefit from AI.
Everyone else is harmed, both directly and indirectly, and it makes the customer experience far worse because workers are replaced by chatbots that are incapable of understanding.
From what I've seen, the only people that have a positive view of AI are those who see themselves as the master of others. The trans, nonbinary, & disabled people in this study are very unlikely to fit that mold.
Plenty of non-chatbots applications that do help the regular user though. Even if most of it is corporate bullshit, some of it isn't.
Like for example VLC using it for subtitles on any video you have, in any language you want and automatically synced correctly. That they hallucinate a couple of times doesn't really matter in that context.
God, the number of people here who don't know what "more likely" means is insane. Just because you aren't trans, enby or disabled doesn't mean the study is bullshit because you hate AI. It means that if you walk up to a random person and ask them about AI, they're more likely to hate it if they exist in one of those groups.
Secondly, studies like this have value because they can clue people into issues that a community is having. If everyone is neutral about a thing, except for disabled people (who hate it), then maybe that means that the thing is having a disproportionately negative impact on disabled people. Studies like this are not unlike saying "hey, there's smoke over there, there might be a fire."
The thing is, EVERYONE hates AI except for a very small number of executives and the few tech people who are falling for the bullshit the same way so many fell for crypto.
It's like saying a survey indicates that trans people are more likely to hate American ISP's. Everyone hates them and trans people are underrepresented in the population of ISP shareholders and executives. It doesn't say anything about the trans community. It doesn't provide any actionable or useful information.
It's stating something uninteresting but applying a coat of rainbow paint to try to get clicks and engagement.
You might be living in an echo chamber. Most Americans use AI at least sometimes and plenty use it regularly according to studies.
The average person is not informed enough to even be aware of the problems with AI. Look at how aggressively AI is being marketed, and realize that this marketing works.
No, it's interesting.
Roughly 50% of transgender and/or non-binary people are software developers and roughly 50% are furry artists, so it makes sense we would be more wary of AI.
I use arch, btw.
Trans nonby software dev who dated a furry artist, my disdain for AI knows no limits.
I use Nobara, btw. (Is Arch good I've never looked into it)
It can be a tiny bit involved to install but if you know your way around Linux already it's perfectly doable. The arch wiki is a great reference for MANY things and it has a dedicated page with installation instructions.
I like that it's lightweight because it comes with the bare minimum for a working Linux install and everything on top of that must be explicitly installed by you. I also love pacman (the package manager). It's never borked anything for me and I've yet to be dropped into a dependency hell in 6+ years of using it.
Never anger the cook, the janitor, or the handyman or some such.
But also never anger the gay bi sexual half kitsune half dragon werewolf that controls your access to the internet.
DO provide them with warm rocks to bask on and loads of weed and warm blankets. Bonus points if you can provide these things with out having to have direct communication and tire their social battery out.
Wait, if I'm not a software developer, then I must be a furry artist 🫣 The things I learn about myself on the internet... xd
Well, some are both software developers and furry artists, which I guess frees you up to be some other, hidden, third thing. Which I'm going to guess is either bass guitar player or train driver?
outliers badly served by advanced averaging machine
Who knew
Ragebait
These findings are consistent with a growing body of research showing how AI systems often misclassify, perpetuate discrimination toward or otherwise harmtrans and disabled people. In particular, identities that defy categorization clash with AI systems that are inherently designed to reduce complexity into rigid categories. In doing so, AI systems simplify identities and can replicate and reinforce bias and discrimination – and people notice.
Makes sense.
These systems exist to sand off the rough edges of real life artifacts and interactions, and these are people who’ve spent their whole lives being treated like an imperfection that just needs to be smoothed out.
Why would you not be wary?
Trans lady here, appalled by AI! A lot of the middle management I work with are eager for it, and since I work in M365 administration, my boss keeps compelling me to flip the CoPilot switch to “on” for people.
I hate it.
AI is the new crypto by the ceos and c-suites, sorry but theres no market for it for a regular customer base, and they admitted its costing them alot more money using AI than actually saving or even profitting from it. its actually no wonder the people who fall for AI /crypto are mostly conservatives.
It has a market for a regular customer base. But they try to shove it down everything just to see what sticks, and most of those things are useless at best or actively making the product worse.
who fall for AI /crypto are mostly conservatives
Let's separate these two things.
The latter does work well enough to be used by a kind of people. That it's not the new revolution is fine. I've recently looked through NOSTR NIPs and they make a huge thing out of functionality for sending "zaps", and you know why? Because payments mean possibility to send universal value for some subjective value. It's a difference in efficiency between barter and money almost.
I can't be proud of it, because, despite sharing libertarian ideas, I was highly skeptical of such systems. One can say I was gaslighted into considering it all having become a scam.
So - NOSTR looks like something that will work. Its standards involve a lot of different functionality, so clients usually decide to implement only part of it - some like Reddit\Lemmy communities, some like Telegram group chats, and so on (it kinda seems to even out with time, Amethyst has recently got group chats, for example). And thus it often seems devoid of life for new people. But it's already big enough for the search results to not seem particularly right-wing skewed.
So - I've noticed that people very often send these "zaps". It's normal to tip stuff in NOSTR. Already.
It's a long-term advantage, but that system in its architecture is far better than Fediverse, that's what I mean.
And honestly it's not unheard of for left-wing technical projects to use good tooling and competent people and appear impressive, but long-term lose to right-wing technical projects which use some tooling and some people and don't appear too cool, but are more applicable socially.
I really feel like trying to write a NOSTR client, LOL.
Maybe only those are worthy to survive this technology addiction disease.
That's fair, because AI is biased against them.
Possibly.. However, AI will be use to discriminate them as America ramps up their concentration camps for the undesirables.
Smart bunch it would seem.
Fuck AI
Oppressed people don't like the walled garden information tools made and profited from by the people using them as a scapegoat distraction for their fleecing of society?
ITT: "this study doesn't say anything interesting about ME, it must be bullshit!!"
That's interesting. I feel like a lone voice in my university, trying to explain to people that using LLMs to do research tasks isn't a good idea for several reasons, but I'd never imagine that being disabled would put me into a group more likely to think like that. If I had to guess, I'd suggest that there's possibly a strong network effect being abused in our social environment to make people get into the AI hype, and we, the ones who live less connected to the "standard" social norms, tend to become less vulnerable to it.
It may also be that disabled, transgender and nonbinary people are more aware of:
As an autistic bastard I just think it's shit, though I will say that I do partake in the guilty pleasure of Two Scuffed and DougDoug. But I wouldn't feel particularly bad if every bit of generative AI spontaneously corrupted and could never be replicated, generally feels like a money sink for dipshit corporations at this point.
Disabled, vehemently anti-AI enby here. The only thing I'm good at professionally is being a great big brain, so taking knowledge work away from me makes me angry.
I'm none of those things and so-called AI is utter shit.
Actual computer scientists should also be included with those groups.
LGBTC
Because some are artisans and see that their work is being pillaged for AI "training".
Why the FUCK do we need to start splintering this with identity politics? Seriously name one good reason why this isn’t a distraction from the class war. Just one.
Same way the other way around. Remember when grok went full mechahitler?
it's because we actually listened to the plot of the matrix
Hi. Haven't read the article. Straight middle aged white guy here. I too also view AI negatively.
If trans, nonbinary, or disabled people view AI negatively, it's not because they're trans, nonbinary or disabled. It's because AI is terrible, and threatens (and already is proving to) make all of our lives terrible for the sole sake of giving billionaires a few extra pennies.
Though I will say, if trans, nonbinary and disabled people have any extra issues with AI making their life specifically worse, that's not caused by AI itself. It's caused by the wealthy CHOOSING to use AI to make their lives worse.
This doesn't need to happen. None of this needs to happen. Google doesn't need entire campuses dedicated to AI with special power requirements. This is all bullshit.
The survey discovered that people in those groups are more likely to view AI negatively than those in other groups.
If trans, nonbinary, or disabled people view AI negatively, it’s not because they’re trans, nonbinary or disabled. It’s because AI is terrible, and threatens (and already is proving to) make all of our lives terrible for the sole sake of giving billionaires a few extra pennies.
People in these groups may have different or additional reasons for viewing AI negatively that are not common to other groups. It's a question for further research why they tend to view AI more negatively. It might very well be because they're trans, nonbinary or disabled - perhaps for conscious reasons or perhaps because of other factors. The survey shows that there are more questions to be asked and that it would be worth paying attention to the experiences of these groups.
I think a lot of women feel this way too
I'm none of those however I believe they are right to view it negatively. The rest of us should be just a wary.
Yes, generative AI is a normative neurotypical triangulation machine. Why would this be thought of favorably?
I think it's because the average person doesn't understand about five words in your first sentence. They can understand marketing bull that they're fed, though.
••~intersectionality*-*_
TIL, I am transgender, non binary and disabled. That is why I hate AI slop.
"Some groups like bullshit less than others" says survey. "This is why bullshit is bad." says author. "Here's my post-hoc reasoning for why I got these results."
Well that explains a lot about Lemmy's strong dislike for AI with a burning passion.