I'm guessing the people commenting don't work in a factory.
It's Taco Bell wages with lung cancer air and no air conditioning. It's not better for anyone. I work in one that makes a "world famous" product rich people absolutely love. They still look to hire people at $17/hr in a VHCOL area....
Yup. The rose coloured glasses folks think manufacturing jobs provided good pay, when it was union jobs that did that. And you can turn any industry into a unionized industry with enough
fireeffort.Fucking real. Capatalism needs these job, not humans.
That's the utility of unemployment, to force people into factories. Coming soon.
I do understand the allure of "we should make things again", and the security implications of maintaining a local manufacturing capacity and workforce - but I think people from advanced economies are incredibly myopic about what it actually looks like to develop that capacity back.
It'll be difficult for the US to compete on price with countries like China, which have a much better developed manufacturing sector and lower wages / cost of living, even with steep tariffs applied to inflate the prices of imported goods.
They'd probably have to subsidise production in the short-term, and invest heavily in capital to automate production to the greatest extent possible so as to avoid needing to ask Americans to accept lower living standards to stand a chance.
Another thing to consider with manufacturing is logistics, there are so many things that have to come together to manufacture a single doohicky.
Buying land near a transit hub is expensive so you try to buy land in a rural area, but then how do you get it shipped to you while maintaining reasonable prices so you can stay competitive? Ground transit is fine as long as petrol prices are low, but most manufacturing is putting together other goods, which largely come from other countries.
So you.. start a mine to get whatever you need? Just grab a pickaxe and start digging I guess, otherwise it doesn't matter what you make the prices will be 10x china's because the costs are outrageous.
I actually think the security guarantee is an illusion. If we are all dependent on one another we’re less likely to go to war. Conversely, If all countries start competing over the same resources the chances of war increase
I meant security less in the armed conflict sense, more in the less vulnerable to disruption sense. It does make sense to retain a food production sector, and a manufacturing sector for important goods like pharmaceuticals - because countries are likely to prioritise themselves in times of scarcity or crisis. I agree that interdependence is good for avoiding conflict.
People have been brainwashed to hate unions, so they equate the good jobs that can support families with factories instead. There's nothing special about a factory job, except that a factory is difficult to close down when workers unionize.
What we need is high unionization, including sector wide unions.
Why the hell would you change the word to manufacturing vs. factory?
Is there more to this survey? Is someone just cherry picking these two questions?
I think it's obvious people have a much more negative association with "factory job" than "a job in manufacturing". A factory job very much brings the ideas of assembly lines into people's mind. A job in manufacturing could bring that, but it could also bring ideas of engineers, designers, etc.
This is either a garbage survey specifically wording one question differently to get the outcome they wanted; or someone picked two questions that should not be directly compared like this without context.
You and another person didn't fall for FT's propaganda.
Here's the survey.
44 people ITT got trolled.
Thank you. I have spent too much time arguing with idiots that misuse statistics. The wording in the question being different was a huge red flag.
Even the fundamentals of the questions are different. Its not Americans would be better off, but America. Which is a question asking if the nation would be better off, not the individuals living in it. Where as the next question is from the perspective of an individual living in the country.
As an aside, I've worked in factories, they do indeed suck to work at and I will never again go near that work. Mostly because of the types of people. Asshole bosses and reactionary dipshit co-workers. Office work is boring and a little soul sucking but at least the people are chill and generally progressive at office jobs.
I'm specifically talking about the wording of the survey questions. If you've ever worked on making survey's and collected good samples for it you quickly learn how much the questions you ask and the way you ask them impacts the results.
An obvious example being surveys asking Americans about "The affordable care act" vs. "Obama Care". You can swing the results by double digit percentages just by changing the name of the same policy.
But taking the results side by side in a vacuum from this so you can get clicks is all financial times cares about.
The article is written so you think "Americans want others to work in factories but not themselves" but if you think about even the numbers with these poorly worded questions for more than a second they actually make sense.
1 in 6 people you survey are gonna be over 65 and retired (assuming you had a representative sample). And even more are gonna be "old"
More are gonna be college educated and already working in a comfortable job.
Obviously many people are going to answer "well, no it's not for me obviously"
It's actually still a large percentage that want to work in a factory considering everything. Which is the opposite of what the article is trying to imply.
My partner would 100% be happier working in a factory than in fast food. Right now he's in the hospital kitchen which is the next best thing.
I think America would be better if nursing assistant was a job people could just do for the rest of their career instead of calling it a "student job" so they can justify paying peanuts. Hell they're doing that with nurses now too, everybody's going to NP or CRNA school; then who the hell is gonna flip granny? You gotta flip that bird 6 times a shift like a lil pancake just so she doesn't wear a hole in her saggy lil tush! Depressed wages are pushing everybody outta direct care so they can eat, and then there's nobody left to actually provide direct care! And telework jobs like case management and utilization review which wouldn't even exist if insurance companies no longer existed, which would be a deep heresy against capitalism. Granny can probably still call the doctor and a cab for herself but who the hell gonna load her actual body into the car? Even when medicaid covers the bill uber ain't gonna let their drivers take liability for anything more than putting her bag in the back seat for her.
Revalue direct-care Healthcare workers 2025!
I mean, that's not necessarily bad, right? 80% people think that it would be better for them if someone worked in a factory and 25% think it would be better if they personally worked in a factory. So, if the 25% get a chance to work in a factory, they're satisfied and the 80% is satisfied as well.
Assuming the 80% could be satisfied...is a big assumption.
True enough, though I meant it more in the sense of the graph. People can rarely be satisfied.
You could also think that the country would be better off with people working manufacturing instead of gig jobs like Uber or minimum wage at restaurants since manufacturing in the US typically meant unions and better pay.
I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about
Like 25% of the Chinese workforce is in manufacturing (roughly) but they’ve got the infrastructure and have put decades into systems to build what they have.
America would be building it from the ground up. Automation systems take time to iron out kinks and cost a lot up front.
And all this to find out that American made is just a meaningless phrase because it’s not about where an item is physically made, it’s about standards to which the items construction is dictated. China can make things of extremely high quality. They’re just consistently tasked to make things by cutting as many corners as possible to maximize profits at the expense of consumers. Those same shitty practices applied to American manufacturing will result in “made in America” shit. Case in point you can find plenty of stuff currently manufactured in America that is total shit. You can find stuff manufactured in America that is high quality and you can find stuff manufactured in China that is high quality. The country of manufacture is meaningless and this pissing match is pointless
I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about
American manufacturing has been on a consistently upward trajectory and has never been higher. Many things made in America either are highly skilled, highly automated, or both. The hubbub about "bringing manufacturing back" is all just a smokescreen to redirect the anger from Americans who used to have stable, well paying, union factory jobs, who never will have one again.
I'm not disagreeing, sorry if that was the impression, I was merely pointing out that the passive-agressive "someone's American dream, just not mine" does not really apply to the graph.
I think you would need far more than 25% to get to where the average “why don’t we make things anymore” dork dreams about
Germany is at 21% and that's after a fairly sizable decline over time:
Given how automated everything is today, 25% of the population working in manufacturing is a pipedream.
It looks like an emperor's new clothes scenario to me. People agree with each other that the US should manufacture more because they have picked up that that's the respectable answer; not because they see any actual sense in it.
Or maybe it's some sort of nostalgia. I guess people used to say that more people should work in agriculture, because that was somehow their idea of a proper, wholesome country.
People who play medievalist games somehow never pretend to be serfs or farm-hands.
There are a few areas where you would want manufacturing in the country. Defense, some medical supplies, ... Just in case things go bad, you'd want some capacity, some expertise in the country to be less dependent. You'd spend extra resources just in case, just to be safe. But it's never a rational end in itself.
That 25% may not know that most US manufacturing is outsourced to nations with a lower valued currency, lax health and safety regulations, child labor, and/or slave labor. It’s probably still a cushy upgrade for coal miners.
I'd be better off if I worked in a factory but they paid me $250k. Balls in your court, factory owner.
Eh, I don't want more people working in manufacturing. I want more people enjoying their lives and maybe robots doing that sort of job. Ew, me and my progressive thoughts.
Subtext: Americans would be fine with minorities working in factories.
But they also want the minorities all deported... or imprisoned.
Wait, they want to use prison labor, don't they. We're just taking this back to slave labor again.
I feel like there are a lot of dimensions to this. I am a huge proponent of manufacturing, but yeah a lot of factory jobs suck. The problem is, they don't have to. Modern factories are way better than old ones, and could be even better if we as a culture prioritized making jobs less soul crushing rather than access to cheap shit. I also feel like people who haven't worked in manufacturing don't really understand what it's like in a modern facility. I think there's this idea that it's working at an assembly line or going out and turning a bunch of valves all the time but nowadays 99% of it is just sitting at a computer watching numbers. I wouldn't want to be on the floor at my current job but I've worked other places where it seems a hell of a lot better than most other jobs available to non college grads.
Another issue is that modern manufacturing sites are super automated. Very few people actually work at them, at least the ones in America. You can have a plant that makes millions of pounds of plastic a year that employs 60-70 people, which is less than a typical Walmart.
Only about 10% of the working population in the US is in manufacturing, so 20% more people that would want to work in manufacturing is quite a lot. It's impossible to undo the automation that has happened to date, though. Worse, if more people work in manufacturing, the pressure on wages and the pressure to automate can both increase.
Even if we stop all imports and make every finished good purchased in the US here, it's far from enough to bring us back to the historic levels of employment in manufacturing.
Thanks, as much as I think whatever the US government is doing rn is dumb and self-destructive, it's important to clarify these two charts don't contradict each other.
20% is a lot. Goes to show that the working conditions in the US are bad.
Capital wants us all to serve until death. Don't fall for their factory bullshit. We shouldn't waste our lives burning down the planet for their "profits". We need degrowth, leisure. etc. to save the planet and ourselves.
Something, something Rawls' Veil of Ignorance something.
It bugs me that this is labeled "All Americans" and "Republicans". Should be "Republicans" and "everyone else that's not a moron".
Obligatory solid argument to use on people against a living wage: https://youtu.be/qyIyT2qTtzY
Throw in a bunch of "seize the means" and I’ll vote for the right.
No no, you have this wrong. We want factories, but it should be all robots and the people that don't own factories should simply kill themselves.
These are the same fucknuts who dream that once all the "illegals" are gone, their innumerable American neighbor enemies, too many to list but all the groups that aren't almost exclusively white, fake Christian, conservative, and pro capitalism exploitation will be forced to harvest their dinner in the fields for minimum wage or less for 12 hour days as they laugh in victory and mock our sunburn.
Won't ever happen, but it's what they believe is their endgame. In truth, a lot of farms will go under and a new great depression they have to suffer too will occur. But it'll be our faults for refusing to work under the conditions undocumented migrants were invited to do under the lie big corpo pushed for psuedoslave labor that their children would have better opportunities as a result.
To me, a silver lining of this national collapse is that we'll no longer be able to dupe swaths of desperate people in bad situations with drug gangs into coming here only to end up in another kind of bad situation with robber baron gangs.
This goes a long with some of the other silver linings of the world no longer being subject to our soft power bullshit propaganda machine. Bullshit, our number 1 international export, followed by tools of mass human murder, aren't you proud? The world should have kicked us to the curb for our actions decades ago. We've been toxic since the Red Scare, and a straight up global poison since Reagan.
This feels deceptive
People are willing to do something that is worse for them, but in the long term it would benefit their country
I'd definitely be on both blue graphs. As a current college student, I technically would be better off because I'd have a more stable income than just financial aid, which in the current administration I'm worried is shakey, even if I am in a state that isn't completely bending over to the whims of the president.
_and_Manufacturing_Employment.png){kind=link}