We'll see, this all happened long long ago. As we'll all know slavery has been the norm through all of history. It wasn't until America (fuck yeah) came along and we told everyone it wasn't cool.
I always hate plot holes where problems could be solved with money, especially when a character is super rich. Obi-wan and Anakin had years to raise the money to buy Shmi's freedom from Watto. Qui-gon had plenty of Imperial credits, but Watto wouldn't accept them.
So, Ani wins the podtace and then as soon as you're off planet, hyperspace it to the nearest Republic outpost and trade the credits for some money. Go back, buy Shmi, or just cut Watto the slaver in half with a lightsaber. Obi-Wan cuts a dude's arm off for much less.
Or, like, Jedi mind tricks don't work on Watto, but I bet theres a Durosian jeweler across the street that isn't immune to Jedi mind tricks. Trade his Republican credits for all the cash in his till and the nicest Aurodium necklaces in the shop.
And why couldn't Harry take his best mate Ron shopping with him to pick out some decent dress robes or a new wand? Kid's got a vault full of gold, and he basically lives at his friend's house half the time.
So, you're saying more big bad guy lairs need fire suppression systems? Or was only ever my players who restored to fire as a first, last, and often only, option?
why couldn't Harry take his best mate Ron shopping with him to pick out some decent dress robes or a new wand?
That would have put a strain on his relationship with the Weasleys:
He would willingly have split all the money in his Gringotts vault with the Weasleys, but he knew they would never take it.
- Goblet of Fire, chapter 10
The few times Harry does buy stuff for Ron, Ron gets quite uncomfortable. Also, the first thing Harry does after giving startup money to the twins is to tell them to buy Ron some new dress robes.
There are a lot of plot holes from the movies that are explained in the books. That doesn't mean they aren't plot holes for the movies, because those parts (holes) of the story weren't included in the story (plot). Like the entirety of the titular mystery of The Half Blood Prince.
Maybe there's a novelization of the Phantom Menace that shows Qui-Gon going to all the merchants and failing to exchange his credits for local currency or goods. If it wasn't in the movie, it's a hole in the plot.
The closest we ever get with money issues between Harry and Ron is when Ron tries to buy candy from the trolley, realizes he only has enough for a pack of gum, and declined Harry's offer to pay.
I love how Dragon Ball of all franchises avoids this problem via Bulma just throwing money at every problem that can't be solved by Goku just punching it really hard. And if she doesn't do than Hercule aka Mr. Satan does it.
Which is lampshaded by TFS' End of Z dub "Man I'm glad all the people with money only use it for good!"
And it's hard to argue otherwise because weirdly enough, he's right, in Dragon Ball excessive wealth is never actually shown to be a bad thing in and of itself. Even the characters shown to be dictators like Frieza are more concerned with causing violence than accumulating wealth.
Heck the Nazis even show up (the Red Ribbon Army) and the only thing they really want to accomplish is making their leader taller.
There's a lot to criticize about Dragon Ball's story telling, but weirdly enough it never occurred to me "Whitewashing of billionaires" is one of them.
Even if we get the movies involved, only two DBZ movies involve money. One of them is a billionaire who hosts a tournament, and the only problem is he screws up and accidentally hires REAL aliens instead of actors for the space theme of the final battle, and the other rich guy we see uses his wealth to create super powered clones that obey his every whim.... Their only intended purpose is to debunk Hercule/Mr. Satan's martial arts prowess, which isn't really an evil act since Mr. Satan is considered a major celebrity due to heroic feats he never did and is incapable of.
Excuse me have you ever tried to appease a super powered, magical and immortal pink gum monstrosity with the external personality and impulses control of a 5 years old kid but with the inner sadism of a 12 years old kid?
After Book of Boba Fett stabbed me in the heart right where my love of Star Wars is, and then Andor twisted the knife (and got applauded for it), I don't watch those shows anymore. What's unclaimsies and how badly does it break the lore?
What's unclaimsies and how badly does it break the lore?
Skeleton Crew is set in the world of children as much as it's set in the world of Star Wars, and is concerned as much with pirate lore as it is Star Wars lore. "Claimsies" and "unclaimsies" is just "finders, keepers!" and another child's attempt to reverse that.
There's a key moment in the show where it combines those two concepts - the made-up words and rules of children, with the made-up words and rules of pirates -
spoiler for episode 7
A droid decides that a call of "unclaimsies" is "close-enough" to pirate lore that it will let them re-take a ship that's been commandeered by a pirate.
Technically Padmé did try to free Shmi. She sent Sabé (played by Keira Knightley in the movie) to free as many slaves as she could find about four years after Episode 1, and Sabé did manage to free 25 other slaves, including Anakin's childhood friends, but was unable to find Shmi since she had already been freed by that point and had left Mos Espa. The only sign Sabé could find was the symbol of the White Suns on the door, who were a slave liberation group (and of which Beru Lars was a member), and unfortunately they wouldn't tell Sabé anything because they didn't trust her, since she'd decided to try to get information out of local gangsters and criminals rather than going to the White Suns directly. Padmé wanted to send Sabé back to finish the mission, but by that point she was appointed senator and Sabé had other duties to protect her.
The Jedi order didn't want Jedis to have any attachments. They probably would have try to block Anakin reuniting with his mother, or expell him from the order if that happened.
Qui Gon, as he was close to almost rebelling against the order, was probably the only one who understood that the kid needed his mother and that there wasn't nothing bab about that.
Maybe that's why the Emperor send Maul to kill Qui Gon, he needed Anakin oppressed by the order so he can turn to the dark side.
Maybe that’s why the Emperor send Maul to kill Qui Gon, he needed Anakin oppressed by the order so he can turn to the dark side.
This is actually why the song for the fight is called Duel of the Fates, because its outcome actually decides Anakin's ultimate fate in falling to the dark side due to Qui-Gon's death occurring in it. Had it ended differently, Anakin would have been trained by Qui-Gon Jinn, and likely found himself confiding in Qui-Gon instead of Sidious.
Qui Gon, as he was close to almost rebelling against the order, was probably the only one who understood that the kid needed his mother
Qui Gon wasn't in rebellion against the Jedi. Just the opposite, he was all the way into the Kool aid, chasing fantastic prophecies about Jedi Messiah.
His final wish wasn't to see Anakin grow up with his mom, but to see Balance Return to The Force (a problem that's never properly illustrated in the movies, just mentioned as a philosophical hang up).
Maybe that’s why the Emperor send Maul to kill Qui Gon, he needed Anakin oppressed by the order so he can turn to the dark side.
Maul wasn't sent to kill Qui Gon specifically, just to eliminate the Jedi interfering with the plot to spark civil war.
Anakin was one more useful idiot for Palatine to exploit. Only useful until he couldn't kill that last lingering Jedi.