Home routing and encryption technologies are making lawful interception harder, Europol warns
Home routing and encryption technologies are making lawful interception harder, Europol warns
Home routing is a useful technical solution for travelers interested in seamless internet access through their domestic provider. Users can also enjoy enhanced security if the provider...
- Home routing and encryption technologies are making lawful interception harder for Europol
- PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication, hindering law enforcement's ability to intercept and monitor communications
- Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue.
Warning: non-transparent walls, window blinds and door locks prevent lawful interception and surveillance - how are the authorities supposed to know you're not doing something naughty in there?
lawful interception
Idk bout that. Usually you get a warrant for wiretapping and then you pay someone to install it. If they are trying to break encryption or identifying users, that means they inherently are doing something the law does not favor.
Let's also acknowledge that if encryption is bad because it cannot be broken, that means encryption is pretty good at what it should do.
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
DeCSS.
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
Uhhh ransomware?
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
Cracking Enigma was something that needed to been done.
Kinda drives home another point too. Breaking someone else's encryption is something you do to enemies. If you're trying to break my encryption communication or installing a backdoor, you're an enemy, simple as that.
My eternal thanks to FOSS, and open encryption standards.
Alright I'll give you that
Everybody vote for this guy for president.
I mean really......who else are you going to vote for? Spiderman? Yeah,I would too, but we have a two term limit!
It's almost as if police need to get a warrant to wiretap people, and can't just do illegal wiretaps on unencrypted data. I can see why the EU may want to consider implementing processes for cross-border wiretaps, though.
Even if law enforcement can get a warrant, unless there's a backdoor in the encryption then the data stays private. That's the whole point of encryption.
The fundamental problem is law enforcement feeling entitled to snoop on private communications with a warrant vs the inherent security flaw with making a backdoor in encrypted communications. The backdoor will eventually get exploited, either by reverse engineering/tinkering or someone leaking keys, and then encryption becomes useless. The only way encryption works is if the data can only be decrypted by one key.
Anyone else remember when TSA published a picture of the master key set for TSA approved luggage locks and people had modeled and printed replicas within hours?
That's also true. Wiretapping internet communications was more valuable pre-2010s when things weren't encrypted. It is good that things are encrypted now. There's still some metadata that can be pulled now from ISPs, such as IP addresses, SNI, and unencrypted DNS, but cops are better off subpoenaing Facebook and Google than trying to wiretap.
I fixed the bulleted.
-
Home routing and encryption technologies are making
lawful interceptionspying on innocent civilians harder for Europol -
PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication,
hinderingpreventing law enforcement’s ability to intercept andmonitorspy on the communications of innocent civilians -
Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue of Europol not knowing how to do their jobs without resorting to Orwellian dystopian techniques
-
PET technologies does exactly what it's intended to do--protect the innocent civilian from the prying eyes of the not innocent bodies that are hellbent on eroding privacy and security
-
Oh my! Encryption makes it harder to snoop uninvited into things that should not concern them in the first place! Shocking!
Oh no.... Anyway
Good! The government has no business in peoples' homes.
For those who aren't aware. This is talking about when cell phones roam into other networks, they now encrypt the traffic back to the home provider which means law enforcement struggle to tap it (legally or illegally).
PET is privacy enhancing technologies
Good, privacy is why they are being used. The government has plenty of legal ways to invade a person's privacy, perhaps they should consider using them.
One of these guys went on to be a very wholesome beloved actor.
And the other........I assume is still alive.
The other one is Keanu something. He was in a terrible film about a man falling down some stairs, I think.
AWWWWW, POOR FASCISTS CAN'T HACK OUR DEVICES
Because you know that's what it's really about, not "lawful interception". Fuck them.
My main man, you deserve the wall for even attempting that shit, now you're gonna complain we're making it hard?
Hold on while I dig out the world's smallest violin for them.
I don't feel that intercepting traffic should ever be considered lawful.
If you need evidence, get a warrant, and take the equipment.
That's how they used to do it, get a warrant, and wiretap landlines.
Except even back then the FBI spied on whoever they wanted, like Martin Luther King and the civil rights organizers. Always has been this way
man, I do my homelab for hobby and better performance. this is bonus.
disclaimer: didn't read the article past the paywall fade out. and I'm too lazy to circumvent
Home routing in this case refers to IP tunneling when roaming.
you mean like ipsec or vpn? I have been playing with that too for connecting my brother's computers to my self host services.
Good. 'Lawful' interception is total nonsense. They'd have a camera up everyone's ass if they could.
As it is our TVs bloody listen to us....1984 is here.
Good
LMAO, the only way you're getting my OpenWRT router running FOSS U-Boot is by prying it from my cold, dead hands.
...and even then, good luck! Because I will have glued it to my cold, dead hands.
— Soldier, Team Fortress 2
Good!
That's going to be a recurring theme. Law enforcement starts scanning one thing, businesses, criminals and citizens start using something else. They'll have to forbid everything that's not open, but by then legal businesses stop using the net because all their secrets get stolen.
[Answered] PET? Not the bottle i guess.
Privacy Enhancing Technologies. A blanket term for anything protecting your identity (Onion, VPN, etc.) I feel like the people asking for this either have a very limited technical understanding of it or completely different motives. You can't ban encryption. What they could do is ban VPN services from officially operating or certain protocols but that would mostly hit your regular user.
So pet-enabled routers = routers with built in vpn support?
PET technologies = Privacy Enhancing Technologies technologies
Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Some obvious things giving anonymity and plausible deniability but also zero-knowledge proofs and such.
tents fingers
Never heard of Europol. Is that just interpol but only for Europe?
Pretty much.