I checked whether I can access the data on my disk with master password and I can, so I just setup periodical disk backups. Good enough for me, idk if that's what you mean with emergency access though.
I have vaultwarden on my home server and I usually visit it through it's Webinterface because the bitwarden addon for my browser breaks all the time with my vaultwarden instance.
I also have tailscale and a Headscale server so access should be VPN level secure.
I'm gonna be honest, it's quite inconvenient sometimes but it's an ok working setup.
The addon issue gives me the most headaches because it means I have to login like 10 times into the web ui and then search through the passwords every time I am building stuff on my servers.
I hope the union representation they get will understand the very unique way wikipedia is structured so they don't completely destroy the financing model wikipedia currently lives under.
It can be presumed that Spotify is doing that to some degree. There is consensus amongst scientists studying the field, artists, labels and other people in the field about that.
The public domain thing is kind a useless argument at this point;
It is the case law we are building upon currently but that's basically just because haven't gotten a broader legal framework yet and we're still making AI fit into what we have.
But we don't have to answer by citing to the law, we can answer by looking at the ethics and expecting the law to loosely follow our ethics - that's what it is designed to do.
AI takes ideas from other artists without giving credit
AI is trained on art without paying for it
AI can use other artists branding and likeness without their consent
artists make less because AI takes an increasingly bigger cut of the revenue (it's kinda zero-sum, but let's skip that conversation)
AI music can only exist because artists exist, SE we need to keep paying artists enough to keep working
AI might is possibly being used in some instances for money laundering
And so on.
I'm trying to say this because the law is there to follow our feelings. If we structurally don't condone something to a certain level as a society, we make it illegal or we regulate it.
And as you can see, there's plenty of reasons to regulate and some are straight up financial, so we definitely should do something about it.
And with "we" I mean specifically the Republicans and Democrats, the FCC (regulation to combat market disruption), judges, civil rights lawyers, and possible plaintiffs all have the chance to push us into a better position societally.
Shoutout to Bernie Sanders, he's trying to start a movement about it, and as always he's ahead of the curve in Congress.
Great so now the US gov is passing corruption directly into highly competitive fields.
That's awful. That might actually tank the US economy as a whole.
Either you make rules for all of them or nah, but picking out anthropic I'm pretty sure is just plain retaliatory action, which is a very dangerous game to play if you wanna keep your economy up.
Steam gilt laut Experten als Plattform „voller Extremismus und Antisemitismus" mit einer „fest verwurzelten rechtsextremen Szene"
Ich hätte gerne gewusst welche Experten da wieder dahinter stehen.
Don't get me wrong, das was in dem Spiel dargestellt wird is eindeutig Rassismus, aber auch da stellt sich die Frage ob es dargestellt wird des Rassismus wegen oder ob es eine kritische Aufarbeitung ist.
Tbf ich hab das Spiel nicht gespielt. Aber dieser eine Satz über Expertenmeinungen macht mich schon wieder stutzig.
I always look at new things by comparing them to old things.
When PCs gathered widespread adoption the idea of an autonomous robot became popular. But it was still more than 2 centuries before the first practically self-driving cars were tested. It will be another 10 years or so before self-driving is actually feasible on a city-wide level.
I look at AGI the same way people wanted their own wall.e in the 2000s. Yeah, we've made indescribable progress in that direction but still our current trajectory does not provide enough proximity to AGI to ever become feasible. There's probably another 2 or 3 big changes that even gets us close enough to see the finish line.
I mean I get your instinct be please stay accurate.
Facial recognition according to Wikipedia records photos or videos of someone's face, extracts landmarks and such, then does a bunch of pattern recognition and other identification methods like IR, to uniquely identify a face and save it as a permanent or time limited record.
Face tracking iirc ingests live video data and uses techniques more akin to modern AIs to estimate positions and angles of the face, then disregards them. It is not required to save photo or video, you can just catch running frames, do the tracking and then drop them.
You could say you need a camera and some frame of a face, but that's about where the similarities end. Maybe you could say that AIs and pattern matching is similar but ultimately modern AI techniques are a heck of a lot more complex. In fact, the mere difference between object detection / segmentation and upscaling is running on 2 different scientific fields.
Yes, both is risky but one's inherent purpose is the collecting of data, the other one is not. It's not the same.
Which is a shame, because it doesn't mean your concern is misplaced, it's just if you exaggerate you are fostering a more incoherent response.
I checked whether I can access the data on my disk with master password and I can, so I just setup periodical disk backups. Good enough for me, idk if that's what you mean with emergency access though.