Anyone think these scattered recent attempts at protest might be astroturfed by the right and the listed website might be a trap to create a mailing list of targets for the right to monitor?
Need clarity on organizers and money behind these protests and if any established groups like DSA, Indivisible, ETC. are attached.
Edit: A bit more potentially from USA Today. So next question is if anyone knows Kay Evert directly and can speak to their legitimacy in the space? Trust, but verify - We don't need to fight within our own movement, but we also don't need to follow anyone blindly.
Respectfully, your comment continues to say nothing about who is behind it and where the money comes from... WHAT group of people don't you find to be problematic, and based on what? Who are the people that you don't have a problem with?
The 50501 moderators also partnered with Political Revolution, a PAC and volunteer-only activist organization founded out of the conclusion of Sen. Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign in 2016.
The 50501 movement and Political Revolution said in a joint press release they are calling for the removal or resignation of President Donald Trump, investigations into his administration appointees including Elon Musk, the repeal of "oppressive" executive orders and the restoration of diversity, equity and inclusion frameworks.
Remember when they beat the shit out of protesters, shot or jailed them and slapped insane charges on them?
Simply because they protested genocide?
O how we miss those days, such a democracy it was.
typography note: you should say "not" and follow with strikethrough. they both do the same thing and together they imply the opposite, like you wanted to say "not we the billionaires" and changed your mind. now the message says "we the people not".
It's not "we the people". It's "we the USAians". That kind of mindless nationalism is how we got here (genocide, refugee cleansing, etc). It's a source of fascism, not a solution.
I don't understand your comment. Are you saying that the phrase "we the people" is nationalist? If so, I'd disagree. It's the first few words of the preamble to the constitution. It would be strange if the constitution didn't specifically refer to the United States citizens. "We the people" isn't saying "USA first," it's a callback to the ideal that every American citizen should be equal, without kings, as other similar documents defining the government of monarchies would be under some monarch's authority, not "the people." Whether that ideal has been upheld or not is a different conversation entirely, but the phrase itself as a rejection of monarchy and oligarchy is a good message to repeat against Trump and Elon.
The exact line of the preamble of The United States Constitution is "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,..."
It's a direct allusion to the United States' foundational document, and rephrasing that allusion does not make it less nationalist.
It's also a document which many US citizens strongly identify with, and they are invoking that phrase explicitly to gain rapoire and support from those US citizens. Rephrasing "We the People" would only dilute that virtue signal and lower its efficacy.
Also, labor strike on a Saturday was being floated... Travel to state capitol on a weekday at noon? Agree with some others speculating that these are either baby steps of a desperate movement forming with growing pains (fine) or deliberate astroturfing bullshit meant to sap energy, sow confusion and make people disengage. With the calculated and frantic pace of the other heritage foundation/2025 moves to date, wouldn't surprise me if this was the right.
Anyone have any back story on the organizers and money backing any of these recent protest efforts?
It has to be called a 'protest' because general strikes are outlawed. The idea is a show of force to demonstrate the impact the protest could have if it continued. It isn't a party, a presentation, or a performance. It is the decision to exert the economic influence of not working (but not striking for legal reasons).
Not only is he not a gorram king, far as I'm concerned, the orange turd no longer has any legitimacy even as president. What must a president elect do before they can have the authority of that office converted to them? Swear an oath. Violate that oath (and he very clearly has done so), and you abdicate the rights and privileges of the office. But, obviously, those with the ability to do something about it are lining up to kiss the ring instead. ಠ_ಠ
Anyway, that's my thoughts on the matter; we all should start declaring loudly that since he has violated his oath, he loses the mantle of authority.
Don't slip into the trap of believing their way of spinning the facts!
No, only like a third of eligible voters chose fascism. And, truthfully, the real numbers are far less. What do you think the "little secret" they were congratulating themselves about was?! Between Trump praising how much Musk know about voting machines, as well as saying that's why they took Pennsylvania - and then little X, in the fucking oval office, starts talking about his adventures with Dad in places "they weren't supposed to be"... Oh, not to mention Musk making the odd public comment at the time about how if Trump doesn't win, he wonders how much time he'll be locked up for.
But anyway, sorry for the word vomit! I guess you could call me "triggered" these days 😝
The point is - if the 2/3 or more of us not radicalized find solidarity, his presidency ends.