SCIENTISTS HAVE DISCOVERED A NEW KIND OF MALE THAT TRANSCENDS THE GREEK ALPHABET ENTIRELY!!!!
This new type of male belongs to the periodic table of elements. Known for their magnetic charm and iron will above all other types, scientists call this new type Fe Males!!!!!
Could you secretly be a Fe Male??????
How can i sign up to be Iron Man?
It's easier than you think! Tony Stark became Iron Man by wearing a special suit, right? That's the secret!
That's right! You can upgrade your manhood today simply by dressing like a Fe Male! Confused? Don't worry! There are plenty of resources available! Simply Google "how to dress like a FeMale" and follow whatever results you find without question!
"I'm an alpha, what are you?"
"I am the alpha and the omega. Bow before your god."
I'm properly tested and released
That's a bit optimistic, but I'm at least in the public beta phase
Alpha Males think they're top shit, but it's the Gamma Male that's guaranteed to penetrate me
zeta males however, will simply probe you
Gotta love those Gamma Tops
I despise xi males, they have the worst Greek letter.
I hope you didn't mean it, but that is a really gross sentence with a slur phonetically.
Huh? Phonetically it could sound like "ze males" with a thick German accent but that's not what I meant.
I quote:
No one likes xi. It is impossible to write, I mean which great mind thought it would be a good idea to turn a tornado into a letter, simply preposterous.
https://www.change.org/p/the-entire-multiverse-ban-xi-from-the-greek-alphabet
Edit: I can kinda see where the slur is now, bur that's not how you pronounce (the Greek letter) "xi". Xi is pronounced /zaɪ/ ZY or /(k)saɪ/ (K)SY in English and [ksi] in Greek.
Ohio sigma
With the rizz?
OP, don't kink shame
It's still deranged though. If I could accept I have weird, often disgusting fetishes, everyone can.
It's tongue in cheek
Fratbro, "Red Pill" guy, and Alphaverse writer have a conversation that is all misunderstandings:
I still hold to my hypothesis that self-proclaimed alpha-males experience the same kind of body / identity dysphoria experienced by some folks in the trans and enby communities, specifically they feel less masculine than they want to be, and are possibly unable to feel adequately masculine no matter how much they express themselves.
a L p H a M a L e
Sigma meme
I mean it may not be true for wolves, but it definitely is true for gorillas and chimps who are very closely related to us. Also most societies from hunter gathering bands all the way up to multi-national empires usually have a single male at the top. Is that right, probably not. Is it natural?, sort of. There seems to be a drive in a lot of men to dominate society and reach the top of the hierarchy. If you combine that natural drive with someone naturally capable to reach the top of the hierarchy and you get an alpha male. You also don't have to be an incel to recognize a lot of women are attracted to these driven capable men.
The question isn't whether alpha males exist, it's what we as a society should do with them. We shouldn't idolize them and let them rule over us. We should harness there drive and capabilities to help society as a whole
It's not true for gorillas or chimps either - and those groups don't share a social structure. I have a feeling that you are not well informed on this topic.
You could say it's not true for bonobos but I have no idea how you could make the case that a silverback gorilla is not an "alpha" unless you have some very specific definition. Just pulling from Wikipedia as I'm lazy, but if you have better sources please provide them:
The silverback is the centre of the troop's attention, making all the decisions, mediating conflicts, determining the movements of the group, leading the others to feeding sites, and taking responsibility for the safety and well-being of the troop. Younger males subordinate to the silverback, known as blackbacks, may serve as backup protection. Blackbacks are aged between 8 and 12 years
That seems to describe an alpha beta hierarchy structure to me. With chimps it may be a little less obvious and more variable but still, according to wikipedia again:
Among males, there is generally a dominance hierarchy, and males are dominant over females.
And
Male chimpanzees exist in a linear dominance hierarchy. Top-ranking males tend to be aggressive even during dominance stability
Yes humans have way more complex social structures but almost always there is a hierarchy of men at the top usually with a single man at the apex, call them alphas, the patriarchy, the oppressors, the greats or whatever you want, they exist. Denying their existence or the fundamental drive powering them only helps to obfuscate there motives. We as a society need to recognize those people and harness them for the benefit of society instead of the benefit of themselves.
Gorillas and chimps are not similar at all in terms of social structures. Gorillas are heavily polygynous while chimps are more classified as promiscuous. There are more dominant and less dominant males for chimps as well as competition for social status, but social status is less connected with reproduction than in Gorillas, where the head male monopolizes groups of females and infanticide is common.
Most importantly, they are both very different from humans, who are far more monogamous because raising our babies is incredibly difficult. We're fairly flexible and able to have all types of relationships under the sun, from polygyny to polyandry. Our social structures can have more or less dominant members. While that often coincides with men who best wield violence, there are many other important things that are used to exert domination and control, from group support to one's usefulness at important tasks.
Above all else, "alpha" men who rise through the ranks by being brutal assholes are not always those who are successful. If anything, the original alpha male study showed how behavior is flexible given the context. In brutal conditions with mostly strangers, violence and domination is likely the most successful strategy. Typically, wolf hierarchies are based on seniority within family units, where being an asshole isn't always the best idea. The situation drives behavior, so alpha bros will only be as prevalent as our social structures support.
We are capable of whatever currently works best because nature is fundamentally about whatever works best. Biology evolves slowly, but it's also designed to adapt to a variety of circumstances. Most toxic men are made by being rewarded for toxicity instead of being rewarded for rejecting it. Different people tend towards different behavior through a multitude of factors, but room can be made to satisfy most typical impulses in a positive way.
You are kinda right about harnessing things like biology, but our understanding of things is the most dangerous thing of all.
i trAvel ALOne
I'm a sigma male Jesus-pilled Bajonkistani... what are you?
