Yeah, I was completely tuned out at that point. I stopped viewing any current events because the world was so terrible and I was so depressed about it. Funny that it's so much worse now and I'm still plugged in. I guess that's what happens with age and experience. You get worn down to awful news.
I think this is just a case of NYT WANTING a Palestinian genocide so they're more than willing to sanitize the message and promote pro-genocide propaganda.
"Follow me and you'll have a beautiful paradise...don't, and there will be pain and torture".
Paraphrased, albeit slightly...but I'm sure I've heard this offer before somewhere. I've checked my forehead, chest, and both nipples...but can't find it.
That said, I’d like someone from the lemmygrad crowd to explain why Harris was definitively for sure was gonna be worse than this. I’m being serious. Elucidate specifically how Harris would have been materially worse for Palestinians in general, and Gaza (and now the West Bank) in particular.
Edit: typical that nobody who downvoted actually replied at all, let alone with a trenchant comment.
Anyone that said that she would be worse is still going to say the same no matter what Trump does. He could personally go over there and start feasting on their flesh and she would still be lacking in the two things they care about most: she is not a man, she is not white. And they know how fucked up that is. Which is why they always claim that their excuse is something else.