It literally looks like a College Humor sketch right down to Jason Momoa's ridiculous outfit and the fact Jack Black didn’t even change his hair and beard for this.
I haven't seen it, but is it possible that we as grown ups are looking at a kids movie meant for kids without considering that it's meant for kids?
Again, haven't seen it, but it's just a thought.
Edit: okay, I've seen it, and I definitely think it suffers from being live action. Can't know much about the actual story from the teaser, but it definitely took an "interesting" stylistic approach.
Making a Minecraft movie only for kids because you can't be arsed to produce something actually worthwhile must be one of the greatest missed opportunities in movie adaption history.
I dunno the borderlands movie could have been based on the first game and leaned heavily into the setting for a kind of gritty sci-fi alternative to mad max that really shows the underlying horror of the borderlands setting. Instead we got... whatever the thing we got is.
I think that would be true, sure. The biggest issue I've seen, and after reading some of your comments about the SMB movie, they could've knocked it out of the park by:
1: Taking the IP, and it's respective audience, seriously and making sure it is faithful enough.
2: Keeping it FULLY 3D animated.
The fact they felt the need to pay these people for their faces, and (debatable) talent, they could've made the entire movie in animation and THAT would have definitely kept the respective audience more interested.
I've been saying it since the '10s, but not everything needs "real" actors and live action acting. Voice actors with quality animation can do just as good, if not better, for these types of movies. It's just that it's a cash grab, and the fact that culture seems to be dead, that we can sit here and objectively shit on it as adults.
I finally got around to watching it, and yeah you kinda hit it on the nose.
I think it definitely suffers from being live action. It looks like it cost millions to animate, only for them to use the cheapest green screen tech available to overlay the actors.
Tbf even crappy looking CGI can cost a shitload to produce. Ant Man and the Wasp: Quantamania had a budget of about $325 million before tax credits, the most expensive non Avengers movie Marvel Studios ever released (at least at the time idk about now)
Disney's Wish cost about $175-$200 million to produce, which is about average for an animated Disney film, but one of its biggest criticisms on release was how cheap it looked.
I don't wanna defend studios making shitty decisions, I'm just saying, similar to the current state of the videogame market, there's real people with real passion for their craft working on these movies, and it's unfortunate that decisions which they likely have no say in force them to something which reflects poorly on them.
If you feel you've outgrown MC, check out Vintage Story. It's sort of TerraFirmaCraft, or its TerraFirmaPunk modpack, but as a standalone game with its own ideas and mods (excluding the insane metal tier grind).
And no, it's not made my the TFC devs, since that rumor keeps on popping up. It's made by the devs of Vintage Craft, which quickly saw the limitations of MC and moved to work on their own engine. But it takes a lot of inspiration from TFC and many mechanics will seem familiar.
I don't feel I've out grown it, in fact I was just trying a new mod pack last weekend, and honestly I don't think that's possible. I'm just saying the primary audience (and the most influencial audience ofc.) is definitely children.
I will look into Vintage Story though, it sounds interesting!
I dunno. From what I saw it looked intriguing - lots of very bold choices.
Something of a sidenote: It's interesting that there's so much complaining at large about cookie-cutter movies coming out of hollywood, but when something strange or different from the expectation is even hinted at, there's big outcries like this. Wonder why the studios so rarely take risks...🧐
Sure, this is different in that we don't specifically have a Minecraft live action movie yet. It's one of the most successful IPs though. It's not creative. It's just some rich people seeing a popular IP and likely making a shitty generic movie in it with big name actors. We want to see new creative things in new IPs, not just the same few IPs everywhere.
It's not exactly fair to pretend like this is a good risk to take. If you take a beloved IP you better make something that the people who love it would like. From the trailer I don't think they even knew who their audience is. From the humour to visuals this was not made for the people who love Minecraft.
Making a movie licensed after one of the best selling videogames of all times, with a trailer that screams "Jumanji but with Jack Black" (maybe it won't actually be like that but that's the vibes I got from the trailer) is hardly a bold move in my book.
Strange or different? The trailer makes the movie look like bland cookie-cutter junk. They want to play it safe and hope Jack Black can carry the box office numbers.
Yeah that's backwards; my Java modded MC is at home. If anything we need the Invincible meme with "look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power."
Side note, movie looks like the more recent Jumanji release. Bad, heavy on CGI, and not nearly a good as the original inspiration, and includes a tough Polynesian actor just because.
It looks silly and I don't have to hear or see crisp rat in it. People getting worked up over it not being serious or looking odd. It's Minecraft, it was never going to be serious.
I'm not going in expecting to see citizen cane. I'm looking forward to see Jack Black perform. If he's a small cameo I'll be sad I watched it, but I'm hoping they do a respawn joke so he is there the whole time