A viral photo of Andrew Tate in Speedos led to conspiracy theorists suggesting he doesn't have male genitalia and is therefore a trans man.
In a post on Facebook on Tuesday (6 August) which was also cross-posted to X/Twitter, someone named Rob Anderson shared a photo of Tate in what appeared to be a pair of Speedos, also nicknamed budgie smugglers in Australia, and zoomed-in close on his crotch area.
“I guess she forgot to wear her fake,” Anderson captioned the photos, alongside an aubergine emoji, misgendering Tate – who identifies as a cisgender man – and implying that there was no male genitalia present, thus making the controversial figure trans.
Anderson also said Tate was among a number of people who are notable for being “part of the inverted show”.
Several of Anderson’s followers commented that they believed in the conspiracy too, with only a number of people pushing back, leading Anderson to say: “Don’t like what I post, think it’s crazy, get off my page. I don’t care, it’s the truth.”
Anderson further claimed that Tate is transgender in order to “blaspheme the Father”, referring to God.
...
When asked if he supports transgender people, Tate said he “supports individual liberty” because he is “a libertarian”.
However, he has also said that YouTuber Mr Beast and trans influencer Kris Tyson were part of a “psyop” to normalise transgender people among children.
They are coming for your children, everybody at home. Your children are the future which they want to control,” he claimed.
Tate is also a self-proclaimed misogynist and claims to be the “pinnacle of masculinity.”
This is all very confusing and I have now looked at a photo of Tate in his Speedos, which I wasn't expecting to do this evening. So now I am making you do it too.
Edit: Never mind, someone posted the picture directly and I couldn't avoid it. Gross, but yeah, he doesn't have much business to hide down there, does he? Is that why he's accused of raping and trafficking minors, because he's angry...?
I honestly don't care if it's that he was not born male, or a micro penis, or "it was cold". None of it excuses him pushing/living such toxic masculinity. Over compensating is no excuse.
The man's tuck game is on point. Could the Tate saga be the ultimate story of a man fighting the gay demons inside so hard that he does international crimes?
Your biscuit, your beavage
I see your cooter cleavage
Your monkey, your muffin
You ain't hidin' nothin'
Your coochie, your flapper
You're showin' off your snapper
He's either trans, or he has a micro penis and baby balls. I don't think either choice looks good for him and this toxic masculinity image..
Edit: Alternatively his ballsack is so saggy he can just tuck it all the way to his back.
Saw several micropenis claims. I'll tell you how this actually goes down.
There's two cavities above your junk and along your pelvis called the inguinal canals and you can actually push your balls up into those canals, which helps obscure them. The penis itself is floppy enough a material at that point that it can completely blend in. Tate's Tuck game is just decent.