The left loves Tim Walz. Can he unite the Democrats?

Headline suggests that the Democrats - who are currently more united than they've been since probably Kennedy - aren't united.

- I'm all for an annual 100% wealth tax for the richest person in the country.
- Might encourage a few of them to donate a little more. Actually no, they will just create a new business entity and funnel the funds there under another name
If you think that's baffling, take a look at Nate Silver's column:
https://www.natesilver.net/p/tim-walz-is-a-minnesota-nice-choice
I'm not sure if Nate is talking about the same Walz and Shapiro as the rest of us.
- Shapiro has Israel baggage that I am so glad I don't have to hear about online for the next forever. Kelly had a messy divorce that I'm sure nobody wants to have dredged up. Walz seems relatable to a great number of people.
  Plus, he drives a 1979 IH Scout.
- May 2024:
  Polymarket Raises $70m From Thiel’s Founders Fund, General Catalyst, Vitalik Buterin to Scale Global Prediction Market
  July 2024:
  Nate Silver joins prediction market Polymarket as advisor
  Interesting tidbit.
- Lmao, Silver is equating a Walz pick to a TIM KAINE pick.
  I’m sorry, I can’t read any further with sooo much cope.
- You should read through the comments on that post.
  Almost NONE of Silvers subscribers are having it.
  This just a way off base miss of Silvers.
  Believe the numbers, doubt the pundit.
- Silver's claim that Walz is a Tim Kaine pick is just dead on arrival. I'm sorry, I appreciate his actual model, but his argument here is just too speculative.
Dems in array!
- 'D', 'e', 'm', 's'
I think that's a pretty simplistic take considering we just swapped our candidate less than 6 months before the election. I agree with the article's take that Walz has potential to unify the differing democratic coalitions, and don't see any evidence of your claim.
Walz’s elevation earns the left a big victory. Yet because Walz himself isn’t of the left, the pick seems intended to serve a unifying purpose: a candidate who appeals to all different stripes of Democrats for different reasons. The fact that Democrats across the political spectrum seem thrilled by the pick — with effusive support coming from people ranging from Sen. Joe Manchin (WV) to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY) — seems to validate the theory.
It’s important to be clear: The VP selection matters way less for elections than people think. It’s much more important to select a potential president than an optimal running mate.
But you can see why Harris sees picking Walz as smart politics. It allows her to simultaneously hand the left a win without necessarily tacking left — potentially keeping her coalition united even as she works to win over the general election’s decisive centrists.
I think its important to recognize the value this VP pick can bring, and I've not known vox to try to suggest something like that without reason.
Edit: I'm also going to add that your reply is a disingenuous attempt to falsely turn this into a binary unified or not unified condition, not that the article is making such a claim. I entirely reject your statement.
- My statement stands.

I drew a pic.

Walzris
- Goo goo g'joob

He can defiantly crush Vance and speak to the Midwest. I think that is what matters.

Defiantly definitely works too ;)
- While still being a genuinely good person.
  Also, he isn’t shy about cutting through the bullshit to the issues. Like this clip. “Oh what a monster!”…

Dude got nominated like an hour ago. How are they putting out articles like this?

Like the average person ain't even got home from work on the east coast.

People had a week to draft one for each VP candidate being vetted.
Like Carter’s obituary - write it now so you can publish it early.
- https://youtu.be/1tX6jdoruH8
They are preloaded and ready to go. They probably have other articles in the can for the other names that were being considered as well.
It might also surprise you to know that major news networks pre-tape celebrity obituaries just in case that person dies.
- And then there's the video for the end of civilization: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzhPzHhnFl0
The best one I found is this opening from cnn:
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz hadn’t been in the top tier of potential running mates for Kamala Harris until the past few weeks.
No shit!
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/06/politics/math-behind-harris-walz-vp-pick/index.html
Walz has been known to be on the shortlist for at least a week, probably longer. They probably had articles like this in the pipeline for all the likely candidates.
The campaign worked with news outlets and let them write the articles, under what's often called an embargo. Basically, in exchange for holding the story until it's announced, the journalists can write the story ahead of time.
Source: dated a girl who worked in PR and a girl who was in media relations for a large company
- Can confirm.
  Source: married to journalist who counts down the hours and triple checks the time zone math to avoid this.
Presumably various media outlets had articles prepared ahead of time for each of the possible outcomes.
Big news sites will do things like write up a story announcing a presidential win for each of the candidates, then only publish the one that matters after the election. This way they can have a story on the front page within minutes (seconds these days) of having official results.
I wouldn't be surprised if Vox had 1 of these lined up for each of the likely VP picks. If not that, it certainly wouldn't be unusual for a journalist to do their homework on all of the candidates and to have the rough outline and some key facts ready to go for each. If you've already done most of the research, assembling the final story shouldn't take more than a couple of hours.
Well, he didn't just crawl out of a hole, he has a record. The article is making the claim that he has the potential to bring together different elements of the democratic party, which ultimately is the party of everyone else that isn't voting Trump. This is a big tent with a lot of perspectives, and while democrats are largely united against Trump, that doesn't inherently mean they're just as united behind the candidate (as we just saw), and those kind of things are ripe for Republicans to pick at and promote infighting.
Because it’s Zach Beauchamp and he essentially hates the left.
I know everyone is giving you tidy, case-solving “it’s-always-like-this” responses, but indeed you are on to something.
Let the anti-anti corporate work begin (Walz and Harris being the [somewhat] anti-corporate).
- Hmm... are you talking about Zack Beauchamp? Or someone else with publications that represent what you're saying?
  https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/8/6/20754828/el-paso-shooting-white-supremacy-rise
  https://www.vox.com/politics/357963/republicans-white-identity-politics-newsletter
  https://www.vox.com/politics/356824/liberalism-way-of-life-lefebvre
  https://www.vox.com/politics/361136/far-right-authoritarianism-germany-reactionary-spirit
  But whatever, facts don't matter here, considering how many comments want to trash this article (without reading past the title :) )

Donald Trump is ideally suited to expand Kamala Harris' appeal across the ideological spectrum.

I legit forgot what it feels like to have HOPE

Yep.

Harris has an edge to her, she’s quick-smart (imo this is good for presidential material) and that may be off putting to some (because women aren’t supposed to be like that , right?), however, Walz is straight up good guy and he can balance out the ticket as far as presentation.

My only concern about Walz is that he presents so strongly as a good guy/dad figure that, should Harris be elected, the typical behavior is to put the VP up for election upon the incumbent’s term(s) expiring. Does he have the presence to be the potential presidential candidate in the future?

Well now that depends: Would being in the VP chair help mould him into someone who can rise to the challenge?
Who knows!
For now let's not worry about that. Seriously. Trump bad. Beat first. Big unga bunga, big stick, big smack. Don't let go of that question, just file it away for a bit.
- All true, though keeping the fascists at bay in four or eight years will never not be a concern IMO.
Why is that even a concern? Frankly, they should be pushing for legislation that disqualifies senior citizens anyway and he'll be almost 70 when his turn comes around. Just retire, guys. You've earned it.
- It’s a concern because that’s how things generally work.
  Sure, you can wish we don’t have ancient, out of touch older people running for office, but you’ll have just as much success with that by banging your head on the keyboard. So you should be concerned until things turn out otherwise.
People really do think that quick-smart is not a good thing in women???!
If so, I bet it's just the ones who take it really badly when they're outsmarted.
- Misogynists think that, and there are a lot of them out there.
- What samus12345 said, and people don’t like a woman who behaves the same way a man would in a professional environment - and I mean someone who is demanding, disciplines, is decisive, and holds people to expectations. A good boss does those things, tempered with understanding and leeway as needed. People expect women to hide all that behind some sort of female softness, or they call her a hard-nosed bitch or worse and they don’t respect her the way they would a male in the same position.
I like to think there will be a time in the near future when Americans will want there president to be laid back and somewhat boring
- We should be so luck to ever see a time where the president doesn’t need to make a hard decision. Don’t think that’ll ever happen.

He was the best choice. They can win and we can finally force trump to account.

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

Those who wanted Shapiro or another VP pick are just crybabies who are mad they arent getting everything they wanted.

Honest question, who outside of PA wanted Shapiro? I've heard even PA people say it wasn't a good choice. Not sure if I'm just out of the loop though.
- I see the logic of it. He's the governor of arguably the most important state of the election. If you think he could help win in Pennsylvania without costing too many votes from the only other 6 states that matter it would be a good pick
- Obama and other establishment dems