If they were as freaked out by the democratic agenda as they say they are, they would never have made this ruling. It really shows that there is nothing to fear from the democrats.
Martha and Pa both got hooked on Oxy in the 00s, nothing Superman can do about it. He tries writing a big expose as Clark Kent but the Planet kills the story because Perdue buys a lot of ad space with them.
Public got too weird about Supergirl, forcing her to retire as incels kept jumping off of buildings so they could grope her when she saved them.
Yeah I was thinking about this in regards to superhero relevance.
A relevant Spider-Man story today would be one in which Spider-Man is saving people from the NYPD. Webbing up cops doing stop and frisk, terrorizing a racist cop, fucking with the mayor who shut down libraries on Sundays.
Mugen train made half a billion dollars in theaters
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité
Unless I see a Muslim person on the street, then we're locking everything down and it's every man for himself.
A low information voter, also known as a misinformation voter, is someone who participates in elections despite being generally poorly informed about political issues[1]. This term has been popular in the United States since the mid-1990s.
Key characteristics of low information voters include:
- They tend to have more moderate ideological views compared to high-information voters[1].
- They are less likely to vote, but when they do, they often choose candidates based on personal appeal rather than policy positions[1].
- They are more likely to be swing voters and vote split-ticket[1].
- They may rely on cues or heuristics, such as a candidate's appearance or behavior, rather than substantial information to make voting decisions[1].
- They can be more susceptible to emotional appeals on various topics, including the economy, immigration, and racial relations[4].
Low information voters often lack fundamental facts about government and exhibit a low "need for cognition," meaning they are less inclined to engage in effortful thinking about complex issues[4]. This can make them more vulnerable to misinformation and less likely to critically evaluate candidates' claims or policy positions[4].
It's important to note that the term "low information voter" is sometimes used pejoratively, particularly in American political discourse[1]. However, the concept is studied seriously in political science to understand voting behavior and its impact on electoral outcomes.
Citations: [1] Low information voter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_information_voter [2] What Are Low Information Voters? - ThoughtCo https://www.thoughtco.com/low-information-voters-5184982 [3] Trump Is Preying on Low-Information Voters - New York Magazine https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-low-information-voters.html [4] 'Low information voters' are a crucial part of Trump's support https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/07/low-information-voters-are-a-crucial-part-of-trumps-support/ [5] The Tragedy Of Rush Limbaugh's Low Information Voter Theory https://www.forbes.com/sites/cedricmuhammad/2013/08/27/the-tragedy-of-rush-limbaughs-low-information-voter-theory/
They would choose not to because it would save them money and that's all they care about.
Remember, they used to kick you off their plans when you got cancer claiming it was a preexisting condition.
Because Hilary campaigned on banning private prisons which caused their stocks to collapse for a year until she lost.
Every gay person on their spouses healthcare plan who will be thrown off it gives a fuck.
Yep, now they will run those lies on every social media timeline and they'll look believable to low information voters
Canada getting PP too.
This will be a pretty critical 6 years to prepare for the climate apocalypse coming up, and we'll all be going into it with the worst possible leaders imaginable.
Bernie had 4 years to shore up his weakness with black voters, the same issue he ran into against Hilary and didn't.
Bernie could've offered Pete VP to stay in the race and continue splitting the centrist vote, but he didn't.
In the timeline where Bernie won, and also beat Trump, we'd be dealing with progressives feeling betrayed that he inevitably did what ever other US president would do and sent weapons to Israel after Oct 7th.
Same reason every independent store and restaurant gets replaced by a chain.
People want what's familiar. Both these men won their primaries and have the most support out of anyone in their parties.
It wasn't a debate. It was 2 hours of clip harvesting in which the right got everything they could possibly want while the left got squat diddly