Would you wear a body cam at work?
Would you wear a body cam at work?
If body cams get cheaper and cheaper, companies might start asking more people to wear them while working.
E.g.: https://coloradosun.com/2024/07/31/youth-corrections-audio-surveillance/
I could see this for doctors, at restaurants, stores,, etc... eventually.
Are you ready to wear one?
EDIT TO ADD: A few people said this wouldn't ever make sense for doctors (privacy laws) or for fixed locations (stores). I should have thought of that.
But what about Uber / bus drivers, or repair people who go into homes? I can imagine a large corporation thinking a cam is a good idea, for their own CYA (not for the customers' or the employees').
Also I don't like this idea either, to be clear. I was mostly playing devil's advocate here to see what you all think. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Pretty much what I expected, tbh
Certain jobs I would. fire, police
Most jobs I would not
Sure. But where to draw that line? I can imagine companies will want them for liability reasons.
I imagine if my occupation includes carrying a gun, interacting with citizens, and a historically high rate of extrajudicial deaths amongst people I am supposed to be protecting. A publicly accessible camera would be beneficial to easing the minds of those I interact with and providing evidence for any actual instances where I felt my life was threatened.
Draw the line at jobs where someone wields authority over the public, disputes can't be easily resolved after the fact, and the person doing the job moves around too much for fixed cameras to be adequate. I can't off the top of my head think of an example that isn't in law enforcement.
If you take away the authority part, you could say that, for example, cleaning personnel should wear body cameras because it's so easy for them to commit theft, but they're already treated pretty poorly and I wouldn't want them humiliated further.
I don't give a shit what companies want; the only employees that can be legitimately forced to wear such things are those who have obligations to the public.
The line I draw currently is this. Jobs that we currently look at and say those persons should have body cams. Police fire rescue.
I’d also add landlords and their staff/assistants should have them. Other than that . No I wouldn’t wear them.
I bought a dashcam for my vehicle, and choose to use it to protect myself from false accusations.
Body cams should be like dash cams, something used by employees to exonerate the person wearing them.
I’m not a LEO, and I can respect that maybe it’s not this simple.. but I would expect “honest” cops to voluntarily wear one to protect themselves from false accusations of abuse of power.
But when it crosses over from protecting the employee to big brother watching over you that’s the line.
Body cams used to protect the wearer - Good Body cams used to punish the wearer - Bad
Imagine an 8 hour livestream of someone banging their head on the keyboard until the code magically fixes itself. Very fun.
Same here. But imagine if you were living in The Fifth Element world of mega-corps. They tell you to wear a camera so they can tell when you're not working...
There's monitoring software like that already.
Either they will leave me alone, or they're gonna end up like Evil Corp. Considering my workplace is a Major Bank, it would make sense.
are you ready to wear one?
I'm ready to make an elton john style jacket full of infrared leds
I fucking love this idea!!!
Absolutely not, as that would mean my company violates my country's privacy laws. In my field of work there is no valid reason for wearing a body cam.
Na, I work in IT we have more appropriate spyware than body cameras can ever be.
I work in cinema, recording devices of any ilk are satan and cannot be allowed anywhere near content
ominous
Absolutely not. You can justify it with whatever reasoning you want, but it would be used against employees far more than it helps employees.
Preach. It wasn’t body cams but our company gave us all mandatory phones with custom location tracking software on them. It was done as part of their pandemic response. The phones were supposedly only tracking your location within a mile of the site and were only used for enforcing social distancing and infection tracking. Well when the return to office mandates came around, upper management was suddenly too informed about how much time we spent onsite. They swore up and down it wasn’t the phones and went to pretty absurd lengths to find some other metric to prove it.
Absolutely not. I like my current job, but if body cams became mandatory, I’d quit. I’d get ready to leave if they were ever even “tested” at another location.
You want this for DOCTORS? You want your private health information record like this? Are you freaking nuts?
It'd be on record by the same organisation that has access to your medical records anyway. Doctors are frequently known for abuse of power over disabled patients, trans patients, racialised patients, etc, so it makes it easier to take action against negligent/abusive doctors.
No, I don't. I'm putting on my tin foil hat here and trying to guess what the future might hold.
body cams only make any sense when you're not in a fixed location and already always on camera, or when there's commonly abuses of power off camera. both are true of cops. neither are true of the cashiers at Hot Topic or whatever.
True. Today. But should have said I'm imagining a black Mirror future where things are so bad and the tech so cheap, that corps decide they want all employees to wear one, for their use.
In the linked article, public health workers are going to wear a cam so the govt can tell when they break rules, out in the field. I could see that kind of thinking expanded to other fields over time, no?
It occurs to me now that the cashier at hot topic is already being recorded. So good point.
Hell no, cops however should have less control over the cameras they wear.
I would absolutely, categorically, stop doing business wherever I see employees wearing bodycams.
Hell no. That would turn anything other than unflinching obsequiousness towards obnoxious clients and potential fraudsters into a firing offense. Specially in the already dystopian US job market.
Why doctors? Filming patients would be a nightmare in terms of privacy and data policy.
In my line of work (psychotherapy) it would be equally impossible. People are having a hard enough time as it is opening up to medical professionals, I don't think that the additional barrier of being actively filmed would help anyone.
Yeah I'm not a doctor but I work in healthcare. Would be a massive HIPAA violation (patient privacy laws).
Check out the linked article. I agree with you but that agency is only adding cameras for the agency's benefit, not the worker's.
Youth corrections staff is still a whole other story than doctors though. A physical examination is probably one of the most vulnerable positions one could be in. These cameras would record people getting naked, multiple orifices being examined, and patients talking about symptoms or things they are unsure and often ashamed about.
The cost would be enormous. I imagine many people would be even more reluctant to go to the doctor than they are now.
And the benefit, in my opinion, would be very slim. Medical malpractice is far more subtle than the examples from the article. As patients we're rarely worried that our doctor will physically assault us, we're worried about errors in judgement, delays in care, and prejudices based on gender, ethnicity, age, sexuality, and so on. And those aren't directly observable most of the time. Even if you get the moment on camera where your doctor decides to trivialize your symptoms you mostly wouldn't be able to prove it happened for discriminatory reasons.
Where I work; the public facing staff, security and customer service roles, are now offered to wear one at the start of their shift. They all want to use one.
These workers face abuse - physical assault, threats, harassment - from members of the public.
What has been found is that when they turn the body worn camera on, the other person tends to stop the abuse or at least de-escalates somewhat. (Prior to having body worn cameras available, some of these staff had tried to use their phone to film when in an incident, but it almost always triggered an immediate violent response - one staff had their phone taken and smashed, another was hit in the face)
There has been a decrease in mental health injury claims since using these. My own talks with these staff are that they feel safer, and had asked their employer to procure more body worn cameras as there wasn’t enough for all the staff.
The staff are not required to have them constantly on, they press a button to switch it on when an aggressive situation is forming or they believe they are in danger.
I used to wear one on the railway. We had these ones that you switch on with a big, loud sliding clasp on it, so if someone starts acting a bit shirty, you could often deter them just by starting the recording (which held the previous 30 seconds or something in its memory).
Makes sense, especially if you trusted the organization to use the video to defend you, not just cover their own butts.
There are things that I do where a body cam would be useful, but I wouldn't wear it for office work.
I might be wearing my own small, undetectable body cam, to protect myself against workplace harassment, racism, and unfair labor practices.
I'm a walking, talking landmine for those bastards. /S
Just make sure that you're not in a two-party consent state, otherwise even if you catch something egregious being done to you, it may not be admissible as any sort of evidence.
Note that this may not apply if you are in a public area or an area accessible to the public, however, even with that a competent lawyer may be able to get that evidence excluded based on the consent rules in your state or country.
In the jobs I work at, no, I wouldn't. Body cams would only be used to snitch on people. It makes sense for surveillance to be used over people in positions of power like cops, doctors, prison guards, etc, who are known for abusing their power. Not against ordinary people or members of the public though. If retail workers wear bodycams, it's to snitch on shoplifters. If teachers wear bodycams it'd compromise kids who approach them to tell them something in confidence. Etc.
Sure. Why not? It will probably work like it does with US police officers, magically turning off right before the
murder takes placeself defence happens.Seriously, I wouldn’t care at all. But it’s still a stupid idea and I would strongly oppose it. Even if only in solidarity with people it would fuck over.
A few of the supermarkets in my country have this as an option for staff. Since the pandemic there's been an alarming rise in public attacking shop staff.
That's absolutely wild.
This. Yes. I would just find a new job, but what if all employers in an industry require body cams?
I don’t think it’s going to happen that way. Body cams are needed if you want to record people working in the field, such as police officers, but for people working at a fixed location, an office or factory or what have you, CCTV cameras are cheaper, less intrusive, and harder for a bad actor to screw with by “accidentally” covering their lens or forgetting to turn their unit on.
Absolutely. No better way to prove that you’ve been mistreated by customers or coworkers.
Oh, yes if you keep control over the video. Don't trust your employer to use it for benefit though.
Everyone in the building wears one regardless.
My management or owners are not allowed to see the content and it can only be reviewed by a third party arbitration.
If the camera is off I might as well be dead to my employers and coworkers.
My pay increases proportionally to the success of the business.
Depends on the pay differential and other options. I think it's less useful for positions in my career, but it's not an absolute no.
I literally work for what amounts to a media business, giving me a body cam would be like giving ice to an eskimo.
Body cams can already be had for cheap Electronics wise, they're not complicated or special. Yet, they're still not in widespread use beyond police.
The reason police body cams are pricey is because 1) "military/police grade"
rip-offpremium pricing and 2) The housing has to be designed to be waterproof, shockproof, dust proof etc because of what they do on a day to day.A retail worker is not going to need this level of "proofing" because they're not running through an alley or something in their day to day
Suggestions to buy bodycams that aren't WiFi/Bluetooth?
If I have a gun or am in charge of security, sure. If I’m just flipping burgers, absolutely not. The security camera in the corner is plenty.