They are known for guilt-tripping and trying to gaslight/manipulate mods/admins once they get banned from places, so be ready for that.
Give even one example.
like they’ve done in this thread
You saying someone is me doesn't make them me.
Then you'll consider it a good thing that this is a slanderer you are responding to and that not everything is as they seem when it comes to them.
Never after registering have I ever violated the instance's rules. Some of what they're saying is out of context while some misinterprets things to seem wrong, and none of it happened in the instance itself, the admins of which have spoken to me as seeing through the majority of what is being said.
That it's a dub and not a sub.
I fear that, one day, the wrong people are going to find out I cheated on my finals in order to graduate, which does have consequences.
It’s ironic that I listen mostly to songs without lyrics but often mentally imagine lyrics for many of those songs.
You say that like showcasing one admin's actions (one of the dbzer0 ones no less) is sufficient as appeal to the masses, or that appeal to the masses is an excuse to defend people who have literally been stirring things up by accusing the other side of stirring things up.
Only the third and fourth one are of me in any way (not sure what relevance anything Mastodon-related would have though), and I have never claimed otherwise. They might as well have included those to make the rest seem genuine. But it isn't. Nobody else is related to me in any way, save for the fact we are being dragged into the same issues (case in point).
It's ironic that I listen mostly to songs without lyrics but often mentally imagine lyrics for many of those songs.
Happy anniversary!
Was it a Roman-themed wedding?
If you or anyone would just see what the OP has to say, they'd see that the whole point of what they're saying is that, one, they're not related to me, and two, that even the few things you are right about happened a long time ago outside the bounds of the local TOS and in circumstances which (at this time) have been reconciled.
We discussed all of that earlier in response to when it was last parroted, with much of the charges being cleared already in both private discussions with admins and in public, with you just parroting at this point. Even what you're responding to touches upon that, but I doubt you hear what people have to say before trying to leech your slander onto what they're saying.
The part about my transphobia has been discussed and I was cleared of that first; it would be your turn to answer for your own, considering what the person you're responding to has to say.
We spoke of the stuff I said in the art community, and those whom I've spoken to about it don't consider it as personality-defining as you claim considering its setting, considering the time, place, and circumstances they took place in.
We are about to talk about the claims of me promoting illegal material, which I wasn't doing in that image (what I was doing was defending someone from claims that the person I was speaking to was going to call the authorities on them, which in their country does not apply to "drawn" material).
We did not discuss the so-called "Nazi apologia" or what you claim is impersonation, perhaps because it's a meta-perspective in the former's case (you don't know German law/culture/history at all if you are going to try to hammer that point out of spite).
We are literally settling this as you speak and are at the negotiating table (whether or not I feel it should be a matter we must bring to said table). Meanwhile you are spamming the process by continuing to take anything I've ever said, whether recent and within a decade's range, and trying to spin it. Most places would unban those who have been banned as long ago as you are pulling things from. Can you say "stalker"?
Of note, the anon is not me; not every anon is me (are we forgetting this is the same community whose rule enforcers often say they can only take guesses about who people are), and I was telling that anon I'd check with the admins elsewhere about that rumor.
Your witch hunting wherever anyone you dislike steps foot is getting ridiculous, especially considering your history and especially considering several people, including high ranking people, low ranking people, and senior members, have been accused of being me so far, including people like Candyman337 who is well-known as someone who helps out in the groups. Though there will be varying degrees in the validity people think you have, an increasing number of us are beginning to see your slander campaign for what it is.
The people you bring up towards the end aren't even me, and never have I claimed they are me (and one of them just parrots what you are saying here). People shouldn't have to tell you when something is excessive like this. Leave us alone!
Hypothetically, supposing I proved my innocence, would you unban me?
As I previously said (but which will probably be ignored, because of how easy it is to lie about something that's literally in front of people), admins ask for multiple names to work in coordination in rule enforcing depending on the instance. You say all that like I make it a secret who my secondary names are (which your own proofs prove isn't the case).
If that's what you're saying, more is going on behind the scenes than you think. I'm still a proud community contributor if that's what you're getting at.
Happy Ides of March everyone! According to the Romans, it is the unluckiest day of the year, with it being cursed (I'm even taking breaks on certain things due to it, as one might notice with the icons). What in your life do you most associate with it?
Happy Ides of March everyone! According to the Romans, it is the unluckiest day of the year, with it being cursed. What in your life do you most associate with it?
Not what I said. I am saying it should be up to businesses if they want to yield to that. It strikes me as entitled to say granting the money during their leave is the only acceptable way of going about it. But excuse me for seeing that someone asked what I think of paternity leave and not answering how they might've wanted.
They call it a common gesture of courtesy to inform people that your home would offer itself to those fleeing some kind of devastation (oppressive regimes, abuse, earthquakes, etc.). However, most people don't end up in that kind of humanitarian role. What's the closest you have come?
The Roman dodecahedron is an item that has turned up in a lot of sites where people do archaeology. While most items, given time, have their purpose easily or at least approximately deduced by researchers, the Roman dodecahedron's purpose is largely baffling to even the most studied of archaeologists, who have no idea on where to start with it. This in turn would probably baffle the Romans, who would have seen it as a common household item, no different from a spoon or a comb.
Suppose a few thousand years from now, archaeologists were excavating our remains and had varying degrees of success deducing what different things were for. If you had to guess what common household item of ours would stump them the most, what item would you guess it would be?
The Roman dodecahedron is an item that has turned up in a lot of sites where people do archaeology. While most items, given time, have their purpose easily or at least approximately deduced by researchers, the Roman dodecahedron's purpose is largely baffling to even the most studied of archaeologists, who have no idea on where to start with it. This in turn would probably baffle the Romans, who would have seen it as a common household item, no different from a spoon or a comb.
Suppose a few thousand years from now, archaeologists were excavating our remains and had varying degrees of success deducing what different things were for. If you had to guess what common household item of ours would stump them the most, what item would you guess it would be?
That statement isn't some random thing to grab one's attention, it's something I've seen come to light lately. Those who have been keeping tabs on me will know who I am talking about. Everyone is in a positive frenzy over it. Guess who even helped buy the uni supplies and garb (cuz things like uniforms aren't just for high school) for them?
What's a time when you learned that someone you know is more connected to another person you know (perhaps you yourself) than you would've originally thought?
I hear a lot of people say "I don't use toilet paper, I use [insert alternative here]" but never hear about what is used for the other things.
Referring to any moment in life where someone accidentally found themselves in an issue due to their identity mistakenly being marked as "obvious".
Love her or hate her (and my opinions are mixed), I must confess, JK Rowling was a huge influence on why I didn't become a regular author. No shade on people who get what they paid for, but the young reader crowd is just so gimmicky, and not in a good way, and you see that with a lot of works like Percy Jackson and Twilight (but also predominantly with Rowling's work). How do you compete in such a no-rules game?
So then let's talk about one of the cores of the issue. People often have an epiphany when divulging into Harry Potter, and they think "huh, what's the deal with this if that thing is how it is". While noting that conflicts in literary analysis don't always reflect something that doesn't add up and that it could be a hiccup in details/semantics, the questions themselves don't go away. And there's nothing that matches the amount of those having to do with Harry Potter. What example of which strikes you as the most overlooked?
If Rowling herself ever notices that I'm bringing this up, let it be known I do think of her work as a reskinned Brothers Grimm in the universe of The Worst Witch and that I'm collaborating with another author (Samantha Rinne) whose work I would argue deserves Rowling's prestige if Rowling's work deserves it. Thanks (and here is where I run for the hills).
I was watching Neighborhood Wars, which is a program in a "list format" that documents interpersonal stuff that happens in different communities. It seems in every episode there's at least one thing about the community coming together for some cause, such as everyone coming together to defend an immigrant whose lemonade stand got attacked, or everyone coming together to investigate whether a boy actually committed a certain act of assault that he was accused of (haven't a number of us been in that situation). Think back to the original Spiderman movie when the citizens of New York City started throwing stuff at the Green Goblin and saying "you mess with Spidey, you mess with New York!"
While this was on, a Québécois acquaintance that was visiting my home for some casual time lamented "hélas, cela n'arriverait jamais ici" (roughly "if only that happened here"), probably unaware that the community once drove someone out of town who was trying to incite sentiment and came by to give me a hard time personally (someone I am known here as having talked both about and toward before; their clique was last seen giving a "final awareness message" about me). All despite the fact the only reason I myself barely escape having a "weird flatlander" reputation to this very exclusive community is due to my home once belonging to my grandfather, not helped by being a French Polynesian descendant.
Does your hometown community have any moments like this?
Call me Lenny/Leni @lemm.ee It's nice to meet all you. I am she/her, can speak Toki Pona and English (non-natively), and locatable on Reddit as MozartWasARed. The links at https://discord.gg/sEuSSDz6TQ and https://www.deviantart.com/triagonal/art/My-copyright-policy-and-the-impact-it-extends-into-906668443 are pertinent to me.