Honestly I did not think of that. It would make sense everything considered.

One word I might use is "premature". I definitely don't know about other people, but rather than the anger implied in the question, if someone had a crime or misdeed attributed to them, if what happened mattered, my biggest inclination would be to try to fill in the gaps in my mind. Along the way, this of course potentially implies things like "why did they do it", "how was it done", and "did they really". A lot of people, however, consider it conclusive based on what amounts to public perception, something I am no stranger to being on the receiving end of, and I don't think I have to tell you how destructive that has turned out. It compels me to wonder how scary our state of existence is, especially when typically getting "to the bottom of something" is associated with neurodivergence.

Oh. Sorry about that then.

I haven't had a phone in years.

It happens. For some people for different reasons, this is just the way of communicating that comes out the most naturally. I know a friend on the spectrum who not only does this but combines it with her art fursona/OC, so there's the added quirk of it coming off as a larp. It's not just a Sesame Street thing.

No judgment on Drag, but Leni is curious and wants to know why Drag speaks in the third person.

Lately it's been whenever the temperature drops.

Lately it's been warmth.

Having seen that kind of thing attempted, there is every sign at this point the people in charge there won't allow any changes/intervention.

Yes, that's what going on. I've always been someone people are inclined to make into a target.

He's not kidding when he says the context to understand the whole thing is in what he redirects to.

For example, the second and third sentence is a direct response to the replies which talk about the conditions for which the actions he is asking about would be considered "good". Take the top response for example: "I think you might be the drama at that point."

In the fifth sentence, he alludes to the understanding that the person who made a "first move" (which would be relevant in the discussions just mentioned) is the individual in question, before citing the first few moments of the context (before continuing to elaborate the first part of the fifth sentence). The "promotion" mentioned is an admin promotion. "The incentive to weigh in is thus pre-existing" refers to this, and then he mentions why it applies to him.

I have English issues and even I could comprehend all of this.

Snoring.

You're welcome. Sometimes I don't know how I got this far.

For a while, I thought the answer to this was writing a book I've been thinking about for a long time. Then, after seeming years of thinking about it, I went to write it down only to realize it's unwritable because of certain transitions that were not considered. Starting a week ago, the answer has become another writing project, but I'm not thinking about it that much anyways.

My only strategy is to try to get enough sleep. Coffee provides less of an effect and more of a feeling of an effect.

It might explain a few things if this was an American thing, as I have experienced similar things as well, and I don't know why either. Though in my case few of them identify as American.

We can't really answer support questions here. I'd recommend one of the tech communities for that. You can find them in the search bar.