But why

People really need to stop spreading this misinformation.

It was a TRAIN.

Gangbangs are simultaneous, trains are sequential.

So if you were to compare it to a vehicle a gangbang would be like a plane that goes to Epstein Island, just like Steven King did multiple times.

Reading the story, the "gangbang" part wasn't like a huge orchestrated planned event. The kids were lost in the dark, loosing hope, and knew that IT wanted them to feel down and weak as alone they could be defeated by IT.

In an effort to make them feel close, Beverly took it up her self to make them all Eskimo Brothers. This brought the Losers Club back into solidarity.

I'm a big fan of Stephen Kings work. He's deserving of respect as a writer and story teller. Your explanation is reasonable and true in the context of the story.
There is just no way to talk about, write about, discuss, etc, stuff like that, without the air in the room not going still as fuck. All of what you say is true, it's still.... off.
And that book was just a bit too long, but again, great book, great writer, questionable AS FUCK portion.
- cocaine
- There is just no way to talk about, write about, discuss, etc, stuff like that, without the air in the room not going still as fuck.
  I don't think that's true at all. I think there are a lot of people out there who could discuss it, but that requires a significant degree of emotional maturity and there are too many people who can't step back and be open to discussing topics which make them uncomfortable.
That sounds very much like a pedophile fantasy.
- That's like saying that a lot of people get murdered in Stephen King's stories, so he must have homicidal fantasies.
  Horror writers look for ways to shock and shake up their readers, and judging from the comments here, he succeeded.
- I assumed that there was a reason that he agrees with trump on not releasing the Epstein files.
Thank God for the Beverly's of the world, keeping it all together
Wasn't it because the clown only went after innocent children?
So in order to lose their innocence they had a gang bang.
- They were lost in the dark sewer trying to find their way out/in from Pennywise's layer. I forget the exact scenario. They are lost and beginning to lose hope and have fear take over. As they wander around the dark further, after their last match has burned out, unsure where the exit is.
  The deed brings them together and gives gives hope they are not alone and together they can win.

up for interpretation

Not defending King, as I always found the gangbang suspicious after I learned about it (haven't, and won't read it anyway), but there are people who fully believe Trump is a pedo etc but don't think there's any actual files the way people want. They argue there's evidence, sure, but not the exact client list full of incriminating details on everyone involved that people are expecting to see.
Personally, if I remember the timeline right I can see that point, and it could be true, or there could be files, but I think the lions share that associated with him should be under suspicion, no matter the political alignment, and we should still keep pushing for them anyway, even if there is a chance they aren't the format lots of people think they are.

Stephen King is not a good writer. He has great story ideas; but, his actual writing is poor and he does weird things that are unsupported by the narrative - like writing sewer gangbang scenes with children so that they can defeat the bad guy with the power of underage eskimo brotherhood.

You can explain that in a less derisive way that sounds a bit more reasonable, but it doesn't make it a good narrative choice.

Another example is 11/22/63. People on reddit cream their pants over the book, but it's literally just King self-inserting as the main character so he can (totally uncritically) reminisce over how great small town America was in the 50s/60s and have a fantasy relationship with this incredibly weak/badly-written female character and repeatedly "make poundcake" with her and drink rootbeer floats in diners or whatever. It's an 800+ page book (paperback is 1049 pages) supposedly about time traveling to stop the Kennedy assassination (which is a cool story idea), but like 700+ pages are filled with asinine garbage and the actual plot is thin and pretty bad.

This is pretty much my experience with King. I highly appreciate his ability to consistently create great story ideas, but his actual writing is just kind of bad. Since he has so many books, there might be some good ones in there, but from what I've read I'm not impressed. Not that he needs to impress me, he's done fine for himself.
I read so many of his book thinking "at some point I'll land on one that'll make me understand what all the fuss is about". Never happened. As you said, the guy has great concept ideas, but he doesn't know how to build on them. So many endings are so stupid and far fetched it would be comical if it were a Jojo's Bizarre Adventure episode...
I can't agree more. I enjoyed his earliest works some, but he quickly hits his "stride" and falls into his characteristic writing pattern, making every book more or less the same novel with interchangeable variations on the same plot points.
Disclaimer: I enjoyed the Tower books and many of his other books.
Often his man characters are reparative, always writers. I had many hits with him but also misses. Like maybe because I was too young and have no children of my own I found Pet sematary not very good. But what he does he gets me into a flow of reading. He makes it easy for me to enjoy the book no matter how thin the plot is.
But there a couple of plot points I admit I find now weird and not well played out. Like in The Stand why is everybody understanding English? There is no real communication barrier apart from not being able to talk at all. So I miss language barriers. So his books have a place in my heart but I also grew up with Goosebumps so it was a natural progression to King.
I completely agree. A couple of his books are okay, but most are long-winded, self-indulgent tosh that would have been far better if written by practically anyone else. Half the time, you can skip entire chapters and miss nothing, because he seems to think describing every minute aspect of every minor character’s life equals character development. Five pages cataloguing all the canned goods in Jimmy’s grandmother’s pantry, all the steps of her apple pie recipe, where she learnt it, how she decides which milk to buy, why the grocer moved the milk from aisle 5 to aisle 2, etc, etc, etc – none of it matters and it’s a slog to read.
It’s like he thinks more words equals a better novel. He is a better writer than a director, though.
At least people will admit that the horror books often are terrible. The dark tower books suffer from so much of the same, but are lauded and people will flip out if you say they're not good. The entire first book was like reading a history timeline rather than a story, and was boring history to boot. The second book was better, but still just felt like a really dull friend relaying a story.
People always praise his characters, but they always come across as flat caricatures to me. And he seems to have maybe 10 of them that he just repeats over and over again.

To be fair, he was drowning in cocaine when writing that book, so he managed to keep the lid on it to the best of his abilities.

Ah. This is why everyone posting cocaine.
I was trying to figure out how a bunch of tweens stuck in the sewer got a hold of enough cocaine to think an orgy would help their cause.
- According to King, at the height of his cocaine use he wrote the entire novel Cujo and doesn't remember writing it at all.
  You could also make a strong case that the director credit for the movie Maximum Overdrive should go to cocaine rather than King lol.
- Yeah, King went through a rough patch that only got worse before it got better.

"Buy why"

Drugs.

"no it's about growing up and it's like the pig thing in Lord of the Flies not my latent (hopefully) pedophilia"
Don't blame the drugs, man. Drugs only enhance what's already there. Just like Ambian didn't make Roseanne racist.

Wasn’t IT about the loss of innocence? Also drugs were a factor

I've been told that cocaine is a helluva drug

I always thought the part with Patrick and the refrigerator was far, far worse than the adolescent sex scene.

Also, Beverly having her period is a pretty big plot point. Not exactly prepubescent. The boys maybe.

This scene haunts me to this day. The barrens is for me the most unholy place in fictional existence. Shouldn’t have read it as a teenager. Nobody stopped me cause “look she is reading such a huge book.” …
- When I was 12, my mum told my teacher that I found the books we were reading for class childish. Teacher then gave me IT to read instead. No idea what he was thinking. Being the same age as the characters, the sex scene was the most traumatizing by far.

If you are writing a horror book, you gotta find a variety of ways to scare people. Sex often triggers a select group of readers.

What icks me out is when they make an evil character LGBTQ or kinky.
- I recently heard about how the Hellraiser movies helped represent the kinky community

This scene is such a stain on his legacy I wish he'd put out a version without it.

In interviews he's said how we are the messed up ones for finding it gross. Something along the lines of "everyone is fine with the child murders but somehow the sex scene is wrong".
I've reread it a couple times but skip over that scene.

People reading horror for some reason:

"What the fuck is this horrific shit what was the author thinking"

Paedophilia?

All characters involved were kids, so not in the context of the story.
It was supposed to be some kind of metaphor for becoming and adult or something. The editor and publisher left it in.
Weird as hell, but not like that.
Cocaine?
- Maybe a fleeting dream or memory he had as a teen where he was part of a gangbang?

What was acceptable in the past is no longer acceptable. There are people that can't accept that.

In 1986 though? Pretty sure we had our cultural view on child gangbangs locked in by then.
- Unfortunately it isn't even to this day. Just look at who is in the white house.
- Let's check out the lyrics of some popular rock songs from that time period...
  Or what the age of consent was...

Snortin' Whiskey, Drinkin' Cocaine.

Well, Coca Cola...

There is a what?!

I will admit I've had my suspicions about him for a long time. He's also written a short story of a child being raped outside a library and in another he went into great descriptive detail about the genitalia of a young girl who is lost in the woods. This is after she drank water from a stream resulting in exposure to Cholera.

Really tells us all we need to know about Stephen King.

I read his crap as an older teen, and frankly it sucked.

lol
Stephen King is an objectively good writer, especially when it comes to portraying realistic characters, even if his stories aren't always great. Just because you don't enjoy something doesn't mean that it's not good.
- I like King, but I still have to admit that a lot of his characters sound like what a space alien would come up with after studying humans for a few months.
  "Hello, fellow human! I also enjoy eating Big Macs from McDonald's, drinking Coca-Cola, and listening to Bruce Springsteen music!"

Is this from the fable?