Fanon Failure
Fanon Failure
37 comments
-
-
We can denounce Israel without justifying other atrocities. Do better.
-
No, you actually can't. There are only two sides, the occupation and the resistance. There's no secret third option you can support to feel morally cozy and superior to the people actually fighting for their lives. You have to actually pick a side, and if you try to choose neither you just end up supporting the side with all the power i.e. Israel.
If you don't support the resistance and their revolutionary actions, you support their extermination.
-
I support the resistance. I do not support all of their actions.
I support the right for Israel to exist as a sovereign state. I support almost none of their recent actions, and absolutely none of their military actions.
That you cannot hold multiple complex ideas in your head at once is a personal failing on your part. You may want simple, binary, black and white realities but they virtually never exist in reality.
Any group that is beyond reproach is immoral by definition.
Once again: Do better.
-
Shall we support resistance against imperialism, even if it's a fascist one that would oppress or shall stand next to every oppressed ? It could be a deep political split, for exemple between communists and anarchists, but not in this contexte.
Their is no way to really support arm resistance from US or Europe. But we have some ways to stop Israel support. Defending the Hamas will result in being marginalized from the mass, even if they do support Palestine, for no concrets support for any resistance.
This strategically a none-sense and just a posture
-
-
Khamas kidnapped my baby from inside the IDF tank he was piloting
-
I can't tell if BE is being sympathetic to zohrans statement or not
Seems like a decent enough statement for his current situation with being associated with the DNC tbh, and I don't really watch BE or know his opinions on zohran
-
-
Okay but do you seriously think, in this political climate where everyone is cucked by Israel, that he could have gotten anywhere near the attention and support to win his election by not saying Oct 7 was bad? He was the most progressive/socialist candidate on the field, and honestly it's stupid that he has to repeatedly talk about Israel in the first place, when he had zero power to change anything about our relations with Israel/the genocide.
And even then, the most I've ever seen him 'denounce imperialism' is to say Oct 7 was bad, which if you think that crosses the line you are out of touch with our political reality. Hell, I think in one of the debates he refused to even do the whole 'i condemn hamas' bit, and was pretty much fully critical of Israel
-
-
37 comments
Am I dumb or is the the reply nonsense
Seems nonsense to me, no clue what it means or more crucially if it's even a good or bad thing.
After arguing with some.people about things and finally going and reading a bunch of shit, I'm pretty sure it's in reference to the people that were at a rave like ~4 miles from Gaza and a military base that was a target for the oct 7 attack, and because of the proximity there was lots of confusion about who was military or civilian. Also one thing I read said the rave location was announced like 1 day before, so Hamas also did not know it was happening. Anyways a bunch of people died and were taken hostage from it
So basically BE is alluding to "Coachella” (the rave) next to "Auschwitz"(Gaza) and blaming the capture/death on the people who went there
Don't forget that Israel also had intel regarding an upcoming attack but took no action.
https://warontherocks.com/2024/10/israels-oct-7-early-warning-failure-who-is-to-blame/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-us-lawmaker-affirms-cairo-warned-israel-days-before-onslaught/
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-s-shin-bet-received-intelligence-prior-to-oct-7-attack-report/3094202
Many other sources to be found online.
Makes perfect sense to me, not sure what to tell you.
The first
Imagine actually engaging with people and having a conversation