Even help for the development of infrastructure are a way to keep control on those states.
Imperialist states create foreign market for their domestic firm. It's destroy way of life, relationship with the environment and export mass production and agriculture.
Not false, however more true with autochtone knowledge that have been and is still looted by Imperialist firms.¹
This is still something, through patent for example
Never heard about. According to wikipedia, only the US, the UK and the Ireland are subject to Discovery.
Fortunately we are not in this case; we are subject to the GDPR, so if we could strengthen private information send to us, we have to.
Furthermore, unions have special protections for their information
That's a good point. Even without encryption, we found search tools (such as those in thunderbird) quickly overwhelmed with heavy load (1-2 GB).
We manage shared mailbox in sorting mail in dedicated subfolders. This is not perfect, but in thoses context, manually check in those sub-folders is better that letting those information clear
I know; Java was a big optimization issue in Minecraft back in the days. I was thinking about the addition of javascript in AAA game engine (I.E for menu) or for phone game
No, I was referencing to Javascript or game release too soon that turn computers into toasters. Last I played was RVchere yet; less polygons than Half Life Source, constantly crash because we got not enough ressources.
GPU consumption is more reliable to know how old a game is than its graphics.
When Minecraft was released, I thought it was an accident. That no other game could be popular and run with with an inappropriate language such as Java.
haha. I spent so much time looking for an efficient compression algorithm for audio and movies ... until I finally understood there are already compressed X)
However it allow me to discover zst, wich is uncredible with text :
That's ironic, because enforcing your moral code on others was what allow slave trades.
But I will conform to you point of view for the sake of argument. Let say the problem of slave trade is "that's unethical"
If giving "more comfortable working conditions for slave traders" would abolish slave trades, that would unethical to not giving their more comfortable conditions
No, it's mean that the issue is not the workers, but the bankS. Or to be be even more concrete : the system that produce institutions with the function of bank.
Opposing to those workers would not make a change; maybe you could make them fired, and others could take the place, but our choice wouldn't make much difference compare to those of the employers in the bank industries.
We could argue that opposing to one bank is the same; at most it could bankrupt (ironically), but other bank would take they function.
That why this is the whole industry we shall oppose to, to against one bank, but against all of then. This is why people in revolutionary union organize by industry, and not by firm or professions.
Helping workers in the bank industries getting less hour/day, less harassement and better stability would make the situation where they could diminish or abolish the predation of their employers against others (that are not only customers). We couldn't expect solidarity from people we are not solidaire to.
This is not about right or wrong, this is about effectiveness.
Are we still talking about the trolley problem ?