I kind of agree; actions matters, world shall support. However, actions of many have to be coordinated to aime the same goal. And to do so, we shall be clear of the ideal we want. Hitler do not want to abolish capitalism, but you could have a fascist state that tax the rich. Without upper hand, confusions is counter productive
I don't understand why those 2 definitions are excluding; if the last thing that enforce everything is the collective force, it means that everything has been built to be protected by the collective force. Legit violence is what is structuring everything else. It means that when justice have to choose between defending the police and the army (the wole institutions), it will defend it.
First, no revolution will fix everything. However it would improve it. Prisons do not protect against
rape, including childrapes. Most of women do not sue for good reasons; most of cases are not studied, and even when they are, abusers are not condemned, and even in the last percent of case, when they are, a lot of times, this is not what the survivors wanted, and they is not protections for them.
I said their is good reasons to not do go to the police. The first one is obviously, cops would not file the complaint. The second one, is that cops often are violent at that time against the survivors. From time to time, people are molested or raped by cops. The 3rd one is the vast majority of cases, perpetrators are relatives; it means that suing them could break the social and affective circle of the survivors. This is exactly the opposite of their need.
A lot of this points are valid, even if the survivors is a child. A lot of child raped by their fathers, even after a complaint, will have to stay with him. If they would not, or someone make flee with them, cops would arrest them and make the child stay with his/her abuser.
In the end, this abuse are not condemn in the bourgeoisie. They is a few exceptions, but rape, including of children, are very common every where, but complaint are never seriously taken by cops. Epstein is the exception because he got arrested, but their is a lot of similar case around the world. Even some bourgeois that show off about having sex with minor at the TY with no persecutions.
My point is ; if you are afraid of a world of abusers not managed by society and that could abuse again, we are in this world.
The principle of a no states world would be : make decisions to minimize agressions, including those we, as a society, have to make.
This is not an utopia, a lot of the time the 2 are related : legit violence in the name of the community increase other type of violence.
We learn how to do that now. In the solidarity network we make, those abuse exists, and we tried to deal with it. Sometimes in going to the police, sometimes not, depending of what is the need of the survivors. Sometimes we raise money, we include the survivors in some social circles. A lot of the time (again, when it is the need of the survivor), we exclude the abuser of the places she/he is used to go. We decide collectively if we would accept him in other places, depending of his situation and if he accept that he has abuse and want to change.
Their is not perfect solution, but their is a process to improve. And we could improve it in being in charge, so in getting the power back
It's only to protect children
It's only to protect against terrorism
It's only to protect against rapist
It's only to protect against murders
It's only to protect against deterioration
oups, it's everyone except the upper class
This is how personal data bills and fingerprint/adn collect bills have evolved
You point is right, but the example is not correct.
All languages such as C/C++ are reliable, and way more efficient with ressources. The environment to make simple software such as we browser or text editor are incredibly big. Firefox on a random front page took 300M ram. Same web browser and text editors used to run on 64Mb ram. Same need, a lot more efficiency
However, in tech we are used to be blind to the work needed to carry one one technology. Banks have dedicated firms to keep COBOL running and update it with everything that was missing back in time. Techbros make shit, true. But there is no magical technologies, only workers
Now I want to usurp NTP server IP addresses on my local network to send my local printer back in the 70's. You should have accept B&W printing without those color cartridge, toaster !
GPL impose that derivative work is GPL, not MIT. Indeed, a commercial and a military use could embed work under GPL licence, but I suppose to point ou which part is under GPL. Which is more complicated than MIT, that you could use and label under any licence you want.
I agree that it suppose that those organisations give a shit about law (clearly, they don't), however a GPL infraction could be used against those organisation, next to other infractions for a trial and type of of actions.
Sorry to exhume this post month later, but it's actually the most accurate place I've found to ask
I recently heard that blur and pixelation are unsafe. I want to evaluate how much it is a threat. I didn't find any sources, so I tried to reproduce. I took first pictures of a my search engine, blur faces with signal, and try many "unblur" website. IA replace faces with random one each time.
Is there a valid attack that could undo blur with valid method ? Or is it considered unsure because some people blur with unsafe tools ?
I feel that the Lovecraft is not the same than Lovecraft work.
RPG, comics, and other stuff that get inspired by Lovecraft rarely depict the impossible to understand unknown. They are more related with an otherness threat. If if those are unbelievable, they are not unconcievable. Moreover, Lovecraft rarely depict antagonists.
I think that the mainstream adaptation of Lovecraft, adapt the mainstream Lovecraft culture.
I feel you; I miss the sens of deep otherness. I think it's may be a subversion and make it a tolerant depiction.
I kind of agree; actions matters, world shall support. However, actions of many have to be coordinated to aime the same goal. And to do so, we shall be clear of the ideal we want. Hitler do not want to abolish capitalism, but you could have a fascist state that tax the rich. Without upper hand, confusions is counter productive