Mamdani, AOC and other DSA members should leave party: Dem Rep. Tom Suozzi insists
Mamdani, AOC and other DSA members should leave party: Dem Rep. Tom Suozzi insists
No other liberal news outlets are covering this.
Nah, that's the future of the Democratic party. If he doesn't like it, he can quit, and join the MAGAs. He's already talking like them.
“Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than any other system in the history of the world. Create more innovation. Socialism has failed everywhere,” Suozzi said in the interview, which he even posted to his social media accounts.
Oh? Like social security, medicare, medicaid, public schooling, and stimulus packages? All socialist policies that make America work. But no, it must be the billionaires and billion dollar corporations.
This country would have broken before World War 1 if not for socialist policies that were enacted to save it from total collapse. And here we are at the precipice once again and this fuckweed is calling for everyone to abandon their parachute and commit a trust fall with the greediest most insubstantial people to have ever existed. AKA capitalists
How about you leave. Like, what are y'all even fucking doing anymore? You guys are more unpopular than you ever have been and it's literally your own fault.
Collecting their kickbacks.
The DNC Dems are there to prevent a progressive party from forming. The DNC Dems are working together with the Reps to fight against the people of America for the rich oligarchs running the country.
We warned that this is what is going on before the last presidential election and before that. But people wouldn't want to listen, instead defending "slow genocide" and "lesser of two evils" and other insane statements. Now they keep getting screwed as the DNC Dems understand that they will keep getting away with it.
They could become the traditional republicans with what their views are these days.
They'll just go Republican and cash in on their servitude to the rich
Sorry to be that guy but AOC has become a part of the party. She lied about Biden/Harris doing something about genocide and didn't vote in favor of banning weapons to Israel.
Does Tom Suozzi get to determine who joins the party? Sounds like he should leave the democratic party if he takes issue with what the party members clearly want.
The Democrats aren't a party. They're a voting blob. When DSA becomes an actual party it will shake the foundations of the whole political system.
80000 members, and they're terrified. Not because we are socialists, but because we are organized. Wanna scare the ruling class, give em a taste of DSA derangement syndrome? Join.
So, I now know what dem scum is top of the list to get primaried
Thank you Tom Suozzi for outing yourself you fucking fuck.
The Democratic Party leadership and establishment is not there to help you. They are there to stop you. They are there to act as a honey trap to capture and neutralize progressive/leftist politicians and policies while the Republicans implement the authoritarian police state that the donors of both parties need to quell the inevitable rebellion that will occur once the general population fully realizes the existential crisis we are in.
“…don’t want that in my party…”
Is this guy the new owner or something? I’ve never heard of him.
"I just bought a bunch of Democrat senators. What can I do about all these pesky socialists in my party? They won't accept any of my bribes."
Vote blue no matter who, am I right?
In a general election, where the other possible office-winner is a literal fascist, yes.
Yes, and yet this guy is actively undermining the winners of the primaries...
That's a stupid oversimplification to make it look like both sides are the same.
So I'll call that an attempt of a false equivalence to discourage the opposition.
Non-Post link here:
https://www.newsday.com/long-island/politics/suozzi-mamdani-ucap9t7r
Ideally we should have four parties:
Progressive
Corporate Democrat
Corporate Republican
Batshit Crazy
As it stands now, the Batshit Crazies have taken over and the Progressives are disenfranchised.
Thanks. Most of the other news outlets are less sensational, focusing on his drawing parallels between Mamdani and Trump, as well as drawing lines between capitalism and socialism. He's... not very progressive at all...
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/tom-suozzi-democratic-party-donald-trump/
Batshit Crazy
The name lacks symmetry. How about "regressives"
That's the DSA's ultimate goal, my guy. Use DNC infrastructure to its advantage, and use that as a spring board to breaking with the Dems. At what point that happens is debated within the organization. But this guy will get his wish, sooner or later, especially if the DNC continues to have zero sense of self preservation
Debatable, as you mentioned, but I love your energy. It was shocking how much of a party focus we had this year compared to 2023.
What a time to be a democratic socialist!
Let's make a deal, Tom. Get proportional representation, one of the variations of voting that fixes first past the post, legislate away citizens united, and have fair, publicly funded elections, and you can have the party you want.
Countries with PR are having the same problems with fascism that first-past-the-post systems have. Also, PR gives more, not less power, to opportunistic centrists, since they're often needed to form a coalition, which gives them massive leverage. In countries with PR, the centrists are often in every government, as the governments alternate between center-right and center-left.
PR might seem fairer in principle, but the notion that it's some kind of panacea is unfounded. Like term limits, the benefits are almost entirely theoretical. And in both cases, the "miracle cure" can lead to antidemocratic anomalous outcomes when someone figures out how to game the system. And every system can and will be gamed.
Party purge is very Lenin. Borderline Stalin. How socialist of you.
Well, the good news is that we all know centrists will side with capital. The last step before fascism is almost always cowardly centrists trying and failing to maintain their shreds of status in a world they can’t understand because they lack a binding moral framework.
That’s actually the bad news, I guess. But at least we know it’s coming.
Lately I’ve been noticing (not sure what to call it) this “culture shock” with people around 20,40 and 60. I’m almost 40 and caught myself thinking about good ol 90s films but then again I checked myself and realized how and why things changed and what I started missing still exists. Maybe I’m noticing a difference? But why is this a human behavior and why does it have to be used in politics?
Sure Tom, we need more Schumers.
Suozzi should eat shit and die. Guess we can't all get what we want
Just go join the Republicans if you like them so much! Quit faking being on the left. Every Democrat save a select few are right of centre. Stop pandering to the idiots, work on fixing the mess of a country you e helped create or get the fuck outta the kitchen.
Yeah, entryism can eat my whole asshole
It's clear what the people what. It's not socialism, but it's definitely is progressive. And that's good enough for now
no u
Are there even guys with car salesman hair style that aren’t douchebags?
Yeah, they're mainly in retro country-western bands though.
This guy will start digging when he hits rock bottom.
No thanks, you go instead
Rep. Tom Suozzi's criticism of Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani and other Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) members was uncalled for. Instead of telling elected members to leave the party, he should have remained silent.
The organization and its members have openly discussed the idea of a "dirty break" or starting their own party on numerous occasions. This issue was even a topic at their recent Chicago convention, making it a relevant point for Suozzi to comment on.
However, the DSA has every right to decide its own political strategy. After he left Congress, his seat went to George Santos so he is in some mind-sight that his style of politics wins. This is at odds with us Democrats advocating to respond to Gerrymandering with more Gerrymandering. Being generous to him, not sure "moderate" candidates are the bet to go with.
Ultimately, Mamdani's campaign increased turnout and won in most districts. If progressives and leftists have had to to compromise, then the rest of the Democratic Party should be willing to do the same. If only left the topic about DSA, then to me it would had made some sense but he shouldn't tell any elected/nomitated Democrats to leave(Or pointing at the wrong ones).
If he wants that kind of party imma stick my dick in the punch bowl
Like they wouldn't be absolutely fine with being a minority party. They're comfortable, and they expect to stay that way no matter what.
yep, turns out you can get well paid to lose elections and backstab the left.
If Democrats and Republicans hadn't done everything to prevent modernizing democracy away from the 2 party system, they probably would have.
As it is, the ones that need to go is clearly the right wing democrats that constantly undermine the party to pander to the petrified established systems, and as I understand it, there is work going on to attempt to modernize the democratic party.
It shall be interesting to see what new people like David Hogg can achieve together with for instance AOC, Ilhan Omar and other more socially responsible democrats, that are gaining a pretty strong foothold in the democratic party.
"lolzfukuthx"
"Vote blue no matter who! Wait, no, not like that!"