Trying to avoid antitrust suits, Google senior executives told employees to destroy internal messages
Trying to avoid antitrust suits, Google senior executives told employees to destroy internal messages
Trying to avoid antitrust suits, Google systematically told employees to destroy messages, avoid certain words and copy the lawyers as often as possible.
Nationalize google and incarcerate their board.
I read this as "incinerate". A principled, pragmatic opposition to the death penalty in any case I can think of is the only reason I would disapprove.
Are you kidding?? They are way more accountable now to Wall Street and what’s left of US federal regulators and still-useful regulators like the EU. If nationalized they would answer to no one.
These types of requests always backfire. We got a similar request when I worked for a very large corporation and the very first thing I did was create a backup of our Lotus Notes and take it home. Just in case.
Thats uh... thats a gigantic crime rofl, fucking wow.
Not quite sure exactly what that slots into, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, not complying with the discovery process... but uh yeah wow dang, that's the kinda thing that can actually lead to charges against the actual people that do this, if not at least the people that order other to.
Great job, morons!
... fucking megacorp version of 'the discord channel got leaked, nuke everything!', especially if these directives were newly enacted after any of the anti trust suits began.
Musk is still free and has been openly doing this with self driving junk for years. This is the USA where we haven't had reasonable laws passed since the 1970s.
Not quite sure exactly what that slots into, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice, not complying with the discovery process.
Pretty sure that's a hat trick
Just use Signal. You may be in Pete Hegseth’s next message.
He still hasn't added me to any chats. What should I do?
Have you tried being rich and incompetent?
Did you say in your profile you’re a reporter? Ahha
I read the article, and it's way less bad than the title made it sound. They just set company chats to disappear after some number of days and told employees to not "comment before you have all the facts." This has been the policy of every company I've worked at, including university IT and Amazon.
The title made it sound like they were deleting specifically chats related to open court cases, which is like level 10 ultra-illegal.
I read the article
From the shitshow that's the comments, you're the only one
I've always wondered, is this illegal? Like obviously it is if they've already been subpoenaed or something.
Nah it's illegal to deliberately destroy data to impede investigations. You don't need to have an open investigation for that to be the case.
It remains legal to get rid of old files to free up space or if you genuinely believe they aren't necessary, though, so you need to prove intent.
If there's a subpeona or something, their destruction is itself a crime, but under this law, its the intent to defraud the courts that's illegal, and that intent is always illegal.
The law exists specifically for this situation. Purging important business documents preemptively is clearly not OK.
Citation: https://legalclarity.org/18-u-s-c-1519-destruction-alteration-or-falsification-of-records/
Just to add, if it's found that evidence was destroyed, beyond potential seperate charges for the destruction itself, a judge would also typically give an averse inference instruction to the jury. That means the jury should assume that the destroyed evidence would have been damning to whomever destroyed it.
What that tells me is, assuming google acted rationally in the destruction, either they think they have a reasonable chance that they can beat the evidence destruction charges, or that the evidence is so damning that the reality of the situation is considerably worse than whatever adverse inferences might be drawn.
(I am not a lawyer, so please take my interpretation with a large grain of salt.)
Do you happen to know when the last time was that a rich company was prosecuted for this?
It seems a lot like the perjury laws: there to scare poor people into telling the truth because of almost non-existant prosecution of it.
And if it is a fine and not jail time (white collar crimes are almost never jail time) the fine would have to be much larger than the penalties they would not have to pay because of the crime, otherwise it is simply a net win for the company
It's white collar crime. They'll pay a fine which will mean nothing to them, and nobody will go to jail. That's how it works.
It's illegal if antitrust action is anticipated, according to the article. That said, I know that most places I've worked have had a document retention policy that called for automatic deletion of most documents after some time period, like a year.
First thing I do when I'm told to delete messages is SecureDrop them to the press
This is probably why my company sets 90 day retention on emails and chats
they weren't feeling lucky?