A new 'Matryoshka' campaign: Pro-Russian disinformation makes its Bluesky debut
A new 'Matryoshka' campaign: Pro-Russian disinformation makes its Bluesky debut
Disinformation similar to the pro-Russian "Matryoshka" campaign is emerging on Bluesky, using deepfakes and fake profiles to spread pro-Russian messages, prompting calls for more proactive action from the platform.
Disinformation similar to the pro-Russian "Matryoshka" campaign is emerging on Bluesky, using deepfakes and fake profiles to spread pro-Russian messages, prompting calls for more proactive action from the platform.
Omg, someone more tech savvy please copy it and make it anti-greed bots everywhere instead.
Meanwhile, I'm just in this thread to call out Lemmy.ml lies.
Bluesky list you can subscribe to and block these suspected accounts
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6vblwh2edno4ayc2mku72r7e/lists/3ldrmfbe54m2s
@rahaeli.bsky.social is an old school trust and safety worker/Dreamwidth admin who also runs an excellent collection of lists of inauthentic accounts.
Love all these updating block lists that bluesky has. It's great.
Just be very sure you trust the list owner, as some have already started doing shit like turning them into grudge lists once a bunch of people subscribe, using lists that are popular for leftist reasons to mass add trans people without subscribers knowing, etc. I think Bluesky has been cracking down on that sort of thing, but it’s also something they can only act on once they know about it.
Wish there was one for mexican propaganda... The mexican userbase is really small, but I've already run into some bots
Now, now, now. Let's not be too quick to call it "disinformation" or "propaganda". It could just be Respectful Dissent. Every Opinion Matters. /s
Still amazed this didn't happen immediately when they launched their bias bot
It could just be Respectful Dissent. Every Opinion Matters. /s
Uhu..;)
We need to allow emoji reactions so I can respond with 🤢🤮. Or is there one yet for bOtH sIdEs SaMe?🤡😈
🫠🙃
That's why institutions should be on mastodon, not bluesky. @user@social.someinstitution.com is much more recognizable than whatever bluesky has.
The Feddiverse doesn't really protect against these kind of campaigns. That's up to the instances themselves.
And it's not about mimicking official accounts. It's about spreading and gaining traction to specific opinions. It's known that disinformation campaigns have been targeting posts from real politicians. They boost the opinion while also boosting a counter opinion. Not to mention spread hate in the comments below them.
Veracity of news is important though. Some random person claiming Gandi rapes kids would carry much less weight than @brandy@bbc.com saying so. "News" from some mastodon.social account would (hopefully) get more scrutiny.
If Mastodon were as big as Bluesky is, it would also have this problem.
BlueSky’s verification system lets you make your handle any URL you own (via DNS or a meta tag in your HTML). Like the Washington Post’s handle is just @washingtonpost.com
That seems like a pretty trivial thing for any institution to setup even if most users are just going to stick with the default (“whatever dot bsky dot social”), if only because a URL costs a few dollars a year.
Not that I disagree about institutions being on Mastodon. Important government agencies should be basically everywhere. (Like a local weather service that issues critical safety warnings should be on every service possible.)
Yet our biggest threat for misinformation has been and always will be the US.
The US certainly isn't good on that front. But they're nowhere near the mastery of it as Russia, Mainland Taiwan, or other Korea.
Case in fucking point
Off-topic