It’s the same
It’s the same
36 comments
-
-
This is very misleading. Usually 60 FPS looks worse (especially on consoles and older PCs) since you have to lower settings.
So clearly 30 FPS is superior.
/s
-
dedotated wam? -
To be fair, Windows is gonna hoover up 4GB of RAM before chrome even has a chance.
-
...bogini?
-
-
-
144Hz gang!
-
Both images scroll smoother on my phone, since the screen runs at 90 FPS.
-
If this were on a cheap Chinese graphics card box, the 30 FPS picture would be blurry.
-
Well, with how common TAA (temporal anti-aliasing) is, 30fps actually would be more blurry. It'd be reasonably accurate, though misleading.
-
-
60 is just way too much, I can't even keep up
-
My brain can't process all these frames
-
You have to flip the pages so fast to get 60fps!
-
-
A still image is not the right way to illustrate framerate differences
-
Would a 2fps GIF be better?
-
Might be but dont strain yourself to get one
-
If you upload it to reddit video or some other service that turns them into a 0.5 fpm, it would work the best.
-
-
😮
-
🤯
-
-
This gave me a good throaty chuckle. Nice start to my day. Thanks!
36 comments
You could try 15 FPS and I bet it would look exactly the same, this industry is just rotten. The insatiable search for higher and higher FPS counts is just nonsensical smh
I’d argue that 45fps should be the norm. Anything much higher than 60 and the average person doesn’t gain anything from it. Anything lower is tough for some people to deal with. 45 is a good middle ground, I think.
Unless you make your living playing competitive games, you don’t need 573830575fps.
EDIT: Refined my statement to make more sense. 5am brain didn’t realize it needed to go back to bed before making comments.
Personally I'd agree that 45 is the minimum, but I do feel the difference at higher FPS up to 80-90 or so.
I'd agree that anything above that is only markedly different for eSport athletes and hummingbirds, though 😁
For the above result, you just need 1FPE
But doesn't it typically result in higher motion clarity on LCD?
Their comment was tongue-in-cheek, I'm pretty sure.
Yes, higher FPS absolutely results in better motion clarity. In particular, 15 FPS is so low that it's likely to be perceived as individual pictures rather than continuous motion.