No, for the simple reason that some (yes, definitely not enough) politicians are trying to actually do good things, and they can do good things, in theory. Cops are bad because they're enforcers of any and all laws, and nobody has purely good laws, and they're specifically in the business of protecting property over lives, restricting peoples' freedoms/etc.
The only case where all politicians are bad is in pure, actual communism, which cannot exist at this point in history.
Most local politicians I know don’t get paid (school board, commissioners, etc) or they get paid very little for the time they put in.
If you count up all the elected folks in the USA, less than 1% are what you think of as “politicians.” They are mostly just people you see at the grocery store
You see politicians disagreeing with each others, protesting, calling out bad politics etc.
You almost never see policemen refusing their orders or stopping violent colleagues. If they do, they get fired, so saying ACAB doesn't include them
There's just enough disagreement and "infighting" to make people think their guy is the good guy and the other is the bad guy.
When you look at the overall picture, however, things start standing out.
There was much complaining and gnashing of teeth by most Democrats, and even a few Republicans, when the Bush era Patriot Act was pushed through. One particular Democratic politician even ran on the promise of eliminating it.
Guess what? It wasn't eliminated.
Same thing with war and attacking other nations on their own sovereign soil.
It's still happening, and it never stops, no matter which party is in control of the US government.
"But the other side does it more than we do!"
HOW ABOUT NEITHER SIDE DOES IT! HOW ABOUT WE MIND OUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS!
If cops followed the rules and laws to the letter, then you might have something here, but they aren't "law enforcement" as much as they are "bad guy removal".
They decide who's a bad guy, and eliminate them. When little Johnny football star and his friends get caught smoking a little weed, they get a warning to straighten up and sent on their way because they aren't bad guys. But a "gang" of poor kids toking up are on a dangerous path and need severe intervention to keep them from becoming bad guys.
They decide who needs to be executed without due process, or proof of guilt. They decide that the off duty officer who can't form a coherent sentence should drive home. They decide which high profile members of the community get a "heads up call" before the search warrant arrives.
The people who make the laws can't be blamed because all of the shittiest things that make cops bastards, aren't part of the laws at all.
At least here in the US, every election, 99% of voters choose Democrat or Republican and just ignore the last 40 years of these politicians chipping away at our economic and social liberty, and the people who do that have to convince themselves somehow that they made a good choice.
Most justify it by gaslighting themselves into believing their guy isn't as bad as the other guy, but it just never crosses their minds that APAB because they don't want to think they're the bastards for empowering these people.
Because neither are, or can be true as long as there is a single person of these professions with the heart somewhat in the right place. That doesn't mean there isn't alot to criticize, but hyperboles are not the right, nor effective way to do so. You'll never get a person to admit they were wrong by vastly over-exaggerating.
To be honest, as much as I hate that word, these acronyms are just cringe.
But also police enforce "policy", not so much the law. Someone distills the laws and rules into policy to dumb it down for cops to understand., but they always end up misinterpreting it. They end up bastardizing the law.
Plenty of examples where both public and executive and legislative would've deemed certain behaviour problematic, yet the perpetrator, of marginal power, walks free.
I'd say the law also gives power to the marginalized, when the judicial behaves independently, as they should.
I agree with you there are perversions to this ideal, such as elected judges, plea bargains.
Disagree in general that it can empower the marginalized -- it is at most a reflection of the power that the marginalized can sometimes use, either because they did things like strike or organize in the past, or because they have access to powers won by less marginalized people.
I assume most people haven't had physical contact with a politician. I'm probably one of the few in my area, let alone entire state who actively has met with local politicians.
But I've had encounters with cops, even without them being called. They're always the make whiney pissy people.
But politicians shape the will of the state, and the cops enforce the will of the state. I think it'll be decades before people honestly consider that the party that promises them the moon just to get richer in office doesn't even know their name, let alone actually care about the people who got them into office.