Only a biology professor could know wiping out an entire animal population affects biodiversity negatively.
The genuinely toxic tale is that we sat around for 69 years before we decided to fix things.
Most people like to argue that "people didn't know better back then." That's absolute bullshit. There were ecologists and scientists fighting to preserve wolves in the 1920s, and conservatives and capitalists chose to ignore the best advice of educated experts because killing wolves was easier and more profitable.
Well I for sure learned in school that our ancestors called wolves the nurses of the forest. In our culture anyway. They're very important because by hunting old and sickly animals preferentially instead of killing indiscriminately, they improve the overall health of populations of other animals like deer or elk. Obviously it's also not great for any population to get too large because they'll destroy their own food supply. Again, release the wolves.
The system is geared towards negative presumption of the recent past even as it glorifies and reveres the long past (ancient philosophers and religious figures).
Just in case most of us figure out that anything we think of as new or intractable problems are things that we knew about and were deliberately ignored or actively campaigned against by the same forces that do it now.
PETA is still against it. Adding to the evidence that PETA is not a serious organization.
PETA are POS that needs to be put down like the rabid dogs they are.
Are we about through with the 69 years sitting around about climate change? Can we actually start fixing things?
How much of that was seeing what all those decades actually DID, and a generation later realizing it needed to be changed.
Still it’s crappy we are so crappy with our home. I do think we should work exceptionally hard to fix things here. Find real solutions to problems. Else what’s the point of going to other planets? We need those same skills to survive, terraform, geoengineer, know the potential for ecology, etc.
I like the concise text information, but as a graphic designer this infographic is very poorly laid out and very easily causes confusion (as partially seen in the comments here).
It goes to show that the solution to everything is wolves. If it didn't work, you haven't used enough wolves.
2065: the entire population of Montana is wolves.
spoiler
Don't ask about Idaho or Wyoming.
Is there a way to follow this without opening a terrible Zuck owned website.
We're reintroducing wolves in my state now and its been problematic so far.
https://coloradosun.com/2025/03/05/gray-wolves-depredation-payments-colorado-wildlife-commission/
Nb: I don't have a side in this. Just sharing recent news.
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1598 more on this topic, it is open access
I guess the government pays for all other lost income due to natural events?
Don't dead open inside.
They forgot to ask the elk
Is 31 wolves enough for genetic diversity?
There are national forests next to it and native reservations nearby and a more difficult path to Canada, so you would expect some of the males to roam out. That's only really a problem if they're isolated.
