Ofc there are situations that require military defense expenses. Once said that, using the military expenses to cross all the red lines drawn in the aftermath of WW2 is not to prevent a foreign invasion, but to instigate the chapter 3.
Do you think Russia will patiently wait until every country bordering it is pointing missiles at it? Then you understand nothing about big-scale military conflicts.
It's not a conspiracy, it's a colossal arms industry that will bankrupt the West and Russia the day wars around the world end.
The best possible peace scenario for our beloved world is to deploy Nato missiles on every russian border country ✌️ That worked well in Cuba.
Excuse my cynism, but I just see it very smart to learn from the mistakes of the neighbour.
This smells like how Obama 'got rid of racism' in US. I wonder how the women deaths in Mexico are gonna lower in the followihg years...
He exploit much more than workers. He payed almost no taxes to the countries where he sells, abused monopoly tricks to get rid of competition and started the business before EU had proper regulation on internet market and privacy.
What's hard to believe is none of the previous presidents committed any single crime, while this one committed at least 64 and 'nobody knew'. US intelligence agencies lose huge credibility.
I personnally think the trend is to dismiss crimes until someone is finally convicted. Then the dismiss abrubtly ends and prosecution succees fully. Either 0% guilty or 100%.
If you read a bit of the recent sick Yemen history that flag makes a lot of sense.
Because it refers negatively to a western ally. That's why Israel is commiting 'genocide', but thank god is not genocide.
First bomb them, then declare terrorist.
The japanese generals were from the very beginning sure Pearl Harbour was hopeless, but they had few to lose and very much to gain considering the world was against them.
Die conquering of starve to death.
Assuming 70% russians are imperialists includes grandmothers who haven't conquered nothing more than a kitchen in Murmansk in their whole life.
I understand that if not even at least half of the population vote at all, the winner party can't represent the whole country. Am I correct? I.e: if only 30% of population vote it doesn't matter who win, because most of the population didn't participate.
Fan fact: if all democrats witheld the vote the republicans couldn't govern either. That way we could get rid of both rotten parties.
I mean, he just showed 9/11 images, but flashing??? Wtf women!