You know, when I think of supercomputer applications, I think of deeply analytical problems based on solid math and well understood algorithms that can be highly parallelised to take the maximum theoretical advantage of the hardware at hand.
You know, the opposite of what the "AI" crowd is doing. Throwing vast amounts of crunching power at a barely understood hypothetical black-box problem in hopes that it potentially yields some interesting results. Maybe.
AI is a buzzword with no real ability more than the Machine Learning approaches that have existed for over 20 years now.
AI isn't real, we have not achieved artificial intelligence. Its a marketing term made to hype up pump and dumps.
They made LLMs make ChatGPT sound like a person but it's just as dumb as the programs that came before that didn't sound like a person.
The current Machine Learning models have reached the limitations of their usefulness, and creating more powerful approaches means someone inventing a more efficient algorithmic approach to Machine Learning, which we still haven't done after we reached this model 20 years ago.
Too, bad. He won the election he bought, and so now he's (no joke) being proposed as speaker of the house (3rd in line to presidency) which is an unelected position.
Then if/when Trump dies and JD Vance gets killed/abdictates, you have Elon President.
Anything Musk touches is immediately tainted by association. Any AI product he has a say in should immediately be considered a potential danger to humanity as a whole.
Xitter went bust a long time ago. It’s propped up by political interests. Tesla auto will probably be in the dumps after the smoke and mirrors wear off. No one outside the cult wants to buy a new Tesla.