8mo ago

Temptation

35 comments

This is not biblically accurate. She should be naked, since she doesn’t yet have knowledge of good and evil, and god considers nudity evil, because he is a prude. But also he didn’t clothe Adam and Eve, cause he’s a perv.
- My quip with the artistic choice is that they made Eve have very very long hair which could have served as breast cover. But they chose to add the inaccurate leaves...
- Also bellybutton shouldn't exist on Adam and Eve.
  
  How do you think god counted them? Poke a finger in the belly.
  
  or should it...
  no, no, a birthing God entity is a gross thought, stop...
- It's actually just for support, they're pretty heavy
- And the bible never says the fruit was an apple
  
  Given the era, I wouldn't be surprised if it was actually a fig
- The comic is obviously of a theatre reproduction of the event.
Bottomless but not topless? Eden was a wild place!
- Just like Winnie the Pooh in the Hundred Acre Wood
  
  And my house after 2am.
This implies that the garden of Eden was in the US as they're the only ones that know what pumpkin spice even is.
- Her wearing a bra even before having a bite suggests that too.
  
  was going to say, she was supposed to be naked.
- Maybe 10 years ago but nowadays it's internationally much more ubiquitous
  
  No.
  
  I don't think many places share this seasonal pumpkin obsession.
The devil was not there in Eden. The Bible simply says a serpent.
- The bible says lots of stuff, like this weird erotica about two slutty concubine sisters and how much they loved cock (which was too much):
  "There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses."
  https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/23-20.htm
  Truly, Divine Inspiration was given that day to that author. Praise be to Him for sharing His weird Smut with us little people.
  
  Isn’t that the story that ends in a brutal execution of the sisters? Because the author couldn’t think of nothing but the prostitutes that wouldn’t lay with him?
- Excellent contribution
- The serpent is an embodiment of Satan
  
  It's retconned that way. There's nothing that directly connects the serpent of Genesis, the one "roaming throughout the earth" in Job, and the character of Satan later on. Satan wasn't developed as a character until after the Babylonian Exile. You can make it all fit, but the text alone doesn't say that and the writers didn't think of it that way.

35 comments