Skip Navigation
[meta] Petition to ban certain website links from three community

Some "science communication" websites have really low standards when it comes to their articles. I'm thinking of rags like IFLScience, Phys.org, etc. It's not that you can't find factual articles there, it's just that you can always find better reporting elsewhere.

So I ask: is banning those links something desirable by this community? Can it be enforced without undue burden on the mods?

1
Our Dreadful Future

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/33062819

0
[worldbuilding] Stargone: A brief overview of the frontier of human space after the war.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32932372

> Stargone: A brief overview of the frontier of human space after the war. > > The planet Neu Valais was a command hub for the human colonial militia during the war. As human territories were lost to the Cyborg Collective, FTL travel paths to the planet opened up and a CYCOL nodesphere, a massive command ship took a position over the planet. In a desperate attempt to destroy it, and experimental one shot cannon on the ground fired. It hit and damaged but did not destroy the nodesphere. > > ! > > The fight in orbit and on the ground was brutal, with CYCOL attacks creating holes in air defenses to land ground troops to further destroy the air defenses and command centers. > > ! > > Corporate military forces which had been assigned to protect corporate material on loan to the colonial forces and to protect VIPs were ordered to pull out. The corporations saw the fight as a loss. > > ! > > The corporate forces eventually pulled completely off the surface and CYCOL focused on assaulting the deeply entrenched colonial military command centers. > > ! > > But that all happened back in '73 and the war ended not soon after that. > > Everyone knows the ending of the war, so I won't retell it. The surface of Neu Valais an urban wasteland, the nodesphere above it derelict. Some crazies out there looking for scraps. Even some CYCOL out there that were never quite right after they lost the nodesphere. > > ! > > Nowadays, VB-Sierra is the planet that's the big last hub for humans heading out past the stable areas. The corporations even made nice with the Arweli, which rubs some people the wrong way given how the war went, but I guess it's easier to forgive frogs than tin heads. > > ! > > But profit potential is enough to keep the peace, more or less. VB-Sierra's infrastructure is growing every year. Which is amazing for a planet with mutomorph infestation. > > ! > > When the Universal Corporate Council reorganized in '75, the Prosperity Church gained a primary seat as a recognized corporate power. > > ! > > By then, there was a lot of religion going around. > > ! > > But '75 into '76 was a lot of rumbling in the corporate controlled spaces. The colonies had collapsed during the war, leading to their populations flooding into corporate space. Many of them had been put to work, but it was clearly an unsustainable situation. Some groups of displaced colonists had gone on a one way trip to earth, but the results of those trips was yet unknown. Many other colonists, especially military veterans or those with special expertise looked to go back out into the old warzone, what was now thought of as a frontier to make profits in salvaging valuables or surveying for the rebuilding of colonies. > > ! > > What is out in the frontier are a great deal of unknown unknowns. Teams that head out into the frontier are not just seeing what has become of human colonies, but venturing into what used to be Arweli or CYCOL territory and seeing things never before seen by humans. > > ! > > The Universal Corporate Council, UCC, was a collective entity representing the interests of the major corporations. Before the war it was powerful but balanced by the combined powers of the colonies. After the war, it is the only central human political entity remaining. At least aside from possibly earth, but no one really knows what it is like anymore. > > The UCC wants to expand its tendrils into the frontier by directly controlling the new colonies that will be rebuilt. Of course now that there is little external opposition, the infighting among UCC members and executives is in full swing. > > !

4
My yard finds from today
  • If you have chanterelles in your yard that would be so cool. They're an excellent beginner friendly mushroom, easy to positively ID, and absolutely delicious.

    Second may be a puffball or an earth ball (or something else, I'm still quite a beginner myself). Puffballs should be easy to positively ID too, just not as easy as chanterelles. A choice edible.

  • YSK Doctors of Osteopathy in the US seldom practice Osteopathy
  • So they're schools of medicine with just enough quackery sprinkled on top to receive a different name. And some of their alumni embrace the quackery while others reject it.

    How would you know the DO you're about to see is a quack? You don't I guess. If you're risk averse, you'll just call them all quacks and find a doctor without the quackery pixie dust.

  • Looking for a dumb Level 2 NACS charger

    I'm looking for an EVSE that I can configure and operate without an app - more importantly, that I can limit current without an app. The Grizzl-E Classic would be great - if only it sported a NACS connector. I don't want to use an adapter for my daily charging, and I will use an existing 30A circuit to power the charger, so I need to set the charger to limit input to 24A.

    So far I'm only finding "smart" EVSEs. I don't want anyone having a chance to misconfigure the charger after initial setup, so the dip switches approach of the Grizzl-E is ideal.

    So, any recommendations?

    Edit: Found one! It can be turned into a dumb EVSE with a dip switch toggle. It can also be set for current limiting with dip switches. Had to dig through the manual for that (and all the others I tried, really). If I do change my mind later, I can enable the "smart" functions. I don't think I'll need them though - my car has all that and then some.

    8
    Default comment order falling to apply

    I have top comment order as default. I go into a post, the icon shows it's ordered by top comments. The comments aren't ordered by points though. If I change the order to something else and back to top, oy orders by top.

    On GrapheneOS, voyager 2.37.0.

    Edit: same on 2.37.1.

    6
    They Did The Math @mander.xyz acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    They did the math: cost of LAPD
    go.getvoyager.app Looks like the population of LA is about 3.8M people. So if you had 2.4 cops for every 1000 people, that's about 9,100 cops. Let's assume each one makes $80,000 a year. You still have to include insurance, taxes, and stuff like that. So let's round up to $110K/year. Employees generally get uniforms and tools provided by the business, and cops have a lot of tools. If we're gonna have police, their gear should be provided, so that they don't and shouldn't use random other stuff. Let's say, including basic gun and vest and tools and other wearable gear like jackets and hivis, that's another $3K/year. If you start adding in vehicles and the pure mileage cops have to drive around, it gets pretty funky pretty quick, so let's just say they each drive 150K miles a year, and a lot of it at high speed, which increases insurance and wear and tear quite fast. So let's say a new car's worth of cost every two years for every two cops. Which is about 60M/year. So, salary, toolset, personal gear, and basic cars is just over $1B/year. When you start adding things like pension, police violence insurance, militarized vehicles, administration, and support cops and mechanics and stuff, it gets pretty big pretty quick.. So, while 2B/year is a lot, especially since each cop probably makes more than 80k, and admins probably make more, it really isn't THAT outlandish. There's heavy handed "sprinklings" of corruption all over, too. And along with waste and turnover and lawsuits and shit.... It seems pretty spot on. Now, what to do about ***widespread and normalized fascism*** is a totally different discussion.
    1
    They Did The Math @mander.xyz acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    They did the moth
    2
    Invertebrates @mander.xyz acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    Plume Moth

    Pterophorus pentadactyla

    1
    Luna moth drawing

    Not mine, from https://getdrawings.com/luna-moth-drawing

    0
    Citizen Science @mander.xyz acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    pivot-to-ai.com Google bribes iNaturalist to use generative AI — volunteers quit in outrage

    iNaturalist is a website that crowdsources pictures of plants and animals to help identify species. Its tagline is “A Community for Naturalists.” iNaturalist is administered by its own small charit…

    Google bribes iNaturalist to use generative AI — volunteers quit in outrage

    cross-posted from: https://awful.systems/post/4714650

    > video version

    3
    Agent Nycto on how to attract men towards progressive politics
    go.getvoyager.app Look at what men are missing and how the right is selling it to them. Men aren't doing so hot right now, emotionally and mentally. They feel like they are not manly, and criticized for trying to be manly or liking manly things. There's a lack of transitions into manhood, and the bar that is seen as a successful man with a good career is pretty much impossible. If you have a poor paying job, you're not manly. If you have a well paying job but it's blue collar you're not manly because you're a dumb working stiff. If you have a white collar job you're not manly because you're not doing anything tough with your body. Maybe if you're a CEO who owns the company but also does rock climbing and bear fighting are you seen as manly enough, maybe. Then you have these guys, your Andrew Tates and so on, who act very manly and tell you it's ok to be a man and then spout off some of the most toxic, asinine shit saying that's how you be a man. And young guys fall for it because they aren't shown any alternative. Then on the left you have people who speak ill of men as a whole, and manliness as a whole. Sometimes the criticisms are correct, but a lot of times it's presented as men overall. If you try to say that it's not every man out there who's a monster, you get blasted with criticism for saying "not all men". They also don't provide anything positive or solutions for feeling manly, with the best they can be offered is to be more like women. So young men, especially young cishet men, are actively pushed away from leftist spaces, leaving them feeling demonized by those spaces, and actively pandered to by the right which are offering mind poison dressed up as solutions. So what do we do? There's a few things to fix. 1) leftist media has to stop demonizing men and start demonizing actions. Instead of saying "men are rapists" start saying "rapists are bad". When people start to say things like "cis people are shit" other people need to call them out of it, because if you're supposed to be the side that accepts people's gender identity, it should be for all gender identities. It can feel cathartic to rail against the majority demographic, especially when people of that demographic have hurt you, but if you feel that it's unfair to rail against a group because of the actions of a few members of it, that should apply to all groups. Things like "what's wrong with the straights" doesn't help build bonds with allies, and it turns young men away from leftist spaces. 2) there needs to be validation and recognition from the left for problems men have, like suicide, workplace death and heavier prison sentencing. The left needs to show that they are trying to fix these problems, too, instead of telling young men to suck it up and be a man about it because they are the oppressor demographic. 3) there needs to be people who counter toxic masculinity, not with telling men to be more like women, but with positive masculinity. If a man is having emotional or mental problems, toxic masculinity says to push that down. Femininity says it's ok to be soft and vulnerable. Positive masculinity would say that a real man is true to himself and his feelings and expresses then freely, even if others might ridicule him for it. There's a subtle difference, and the end result of femininity's and positive masculinity's tactic might be the same, i.e. the man expresses those feelings, but the way that they get there is very different. The former makes the man feel less validated in his identity, while the latter uplifts it. The memes where they say stuff like "I always tell my homies I love them before they go to bed" actually work. 4) leftist influencers need to make fighting for the rights of minorities seem manly. Badass. Like a hero. Worthy of praise and celebration. 5) while they won't get the financial and political backing that the toxic male influencers get, there needs to be positive male influencers who talk about masculinity in a positive way, while promoting the ideas above. There needs to be an alternative, who acts manly but in the fun, positive way, that validates young men's feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and isolation, while promoting an egalitarian perspective. 6) there needs to be a cultural shift in what makes a man. A shift away from dying in battle or becoming a tycoon, and a resurgence of the working class hero. Mass media itself needs to change and promote positive male figures. It can work and be popular, like in Avatar the Last Airbender. We need to show men that they are still men, and still worthy of love, respect and adoration, even if they aren't a super soldier or a wealthy elite. A lot of this is counter to capitalistic goals, so it may have to be subversive, but eventually it needs to be made the norm. 7) other men need to continue to step up and speak out about injustice towards minorities and against toxic masculinity behaviors in the day to day, and start decrying those behaviors as unmanly. People need to call Andrew Tate and the like unmanly. 8) ideally, the men's rights movement should be absorbed by the left and the toxic incels kicked out. It should be done in the name of gender equality. Fixing only woman's problems won't solve the patriarchy (which could be changed to a different term so everyone feels like it's less of an us vs them) and feminists should try to help solve men's problems directly rather than indirectly. Young men would see feminism as more appealing if feminists actually focused on men's problems as well, rather than ignoring or worse, demonizing them. Feminism could be rebranded as an egalitarian movement for all sexes and genders, maybe get a name change. If the patriarchy affects everyone, then the focus should be on everyone. Maybe it would have to be a whole new movement entirely. So it's a larger problem than just getting more leftist male influencers, and some of those problems are systematic. Some can get worked on today. Talking about masculinity in a positive way, promotive equity, stop both their side and your side from bigotry, and, probably the thing that would get young men on board the most: Actually trying to solve the problems young men are going through.

    Look at what men are missing and how the right is selling it to them.

    Men aren't doing so hot right now, emotionally and mentally. They feel like they are not manly, and criticized for trying to be manly or liking manly things. There's a lack of transitions into manhood, and the bar that is seen as a successful man with a good career is pretty much impossible.

    If you have a poor paying job, you're not manly. If you have a well paying job but it's blue collar you're not manly because you're a dumb working stiff. If you have a white collar job you're not manly because you're not doing anything tough with your body. Maybe if you're a CEO who owns the company but also does rock climbing and bear fighting are you seen as manly enough, maybe.

    Then you have these guys, your Andrew Tates and so on, who act very manly and tell you it's ok to be a man and then spout off some of the most toxic, asinine shit saying that's how you be a man. And young guys fall for it because they aren't shown any alternative.

    Then on the left you have people who speak ill of men as a whole, and manliness as a whole. Sometimes the criticisms are correct, but a lot of times it's presented as men overall. If you try to say that it's not every man out there who's a monster, you get blasted with criticism for saying "not all men". They also don't provide anything positive or solutions for feeling manly, with the best they can be offered is to be more like women.

    So young men, especially young cishet men, are actively pushed away from leftist spaces, leaving them feeling demonized by those spaces, and actively pandered to by the right which are offering mind poison dressed up as solutions.

    So what do we do? There's a few things to fix.

    1. leftist media has to stop demonizing men and start demonizing actions. Instead of saying "men are rapists" start saying "rapists are bad". When people start to say things like "cis people are shit" other people need to call them out of it, because if you're supposed to be the side that accepts people's gender identity, it should be for all gender identities. It can feel cathartic to rail against the majority demographic, especially when people of that demographic have hurt you, but if you feel that it's unfair to rail against a group because of the actions of a few members of it, that should apply to all groups. Things like "what's wrong with the straights" doesn't help build bonds with allies, and it turns young men away from leftist spaces.

    2. there needs to be validation and recognition from the left for problems men have, like suicide, workplace death and heavier prison sentencing. The left needs to show that they are trying to fix these problems, too, instead of telling young men to suck it up and be a man about it because they are the oppressor demographic.

    3. there needs to be people who counter toxic masculinity, not with telling men to be more like women, but with positive masculinity. If a man is having emotional or mental problems, toxic masculinity says to push that down. Femininity says it's ok to be soft and vulnerable. Positive masculinity would say that a real man is true to himself and his feelings and expresses then freely, even if others might ridicule him for it. There's a subtle difference, and the end result of femininity's and positive masculinity's tactic might be the same, i.e. the man expresses those feelings, but the way that they get there is very different. The former makes the man feel less validated in his identity, while the latter uplifts it. The memes where they say stuff like "I always tell my homies I love them before they go to bed" actually work.

    4. leftist influencers need to make fighting for the rights of minorities seem manly. Badass. Like a hero. Worthy of praise and celebration.

    5. while they won't get the financial and political backing that the toxic male influencers get, there needs to be positive male influencers who talk about masculinity in a positive way, while promoting the ideas above. There needs to be an alternative, who acts manly but in the fun, positive way, that validates young men's feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and isolation, while promoting an egalitarian perspective.

    6. there needs to be a cultural shift in what makes a man. A shift away from dying in battle or becoming a tycoon, and a resurgence of the working class hero. Mass media itself needs to change and promote positive male figures. It can work and be popular, like in Avatar the Last Airbender. We need to show men that they are still men, and still worthy of love, respect and adoration, even if they aren't a super soldier or a wealthy elite. A lot of this is counter to capitalistic goals, so it may have to be subversive, but eventually it needs to be made the norm.

    7. other men need to continue to step up and speak out about injustice towards minorities and against toxic masculinity behaviors in the day to day, and start decrying those behaviors as unmanly. People need to call Andrew Tate and the like unmanly.

    8. ideally, the men's rights movement should be absorbed by the left and the toxic incels kicked out. It should be done in the name of gender equality. Fixing only woman's problems won't solve the patriarchy (which could be changed to a different term so everyone feels like it's less of an us vs them) and feminists should try to help solve men's problems directly rather than indirectly. Young men would see feminism as more appealing if feminists actually focused on men's problems as well, rather than ignoring or worse, demonizing them. Feminism could be rebranded as an egalitarian movement for all sexes and genders, maybe get a name change. If the patriarchy affects everyone, then the focus should be on everyone. Maybe it would have to be a whole new movement entirely.

    So it's a larger problem than just getting more leftist male influencers, and some of those problems are systematic. Some can get worked on today. Talking about masculinity in a positive way, promotive equity, stop both their side and your side from bigotry, and, probably the thing that would get young men on board the most:

    Actually trying to solve the problems young men are going through.

    2
    Scientists find universe's missing [baryonic] matter while watching fast radio bursts shine through 'cosmic fog'
    www.space.com Scientists find universe's missing matter while watching fast radio bursts shine through 'cosmic fog'

    "Fast radio bursts shine through the fog of the intergalactic medium, and by precisely measuring how the light slows down, we can weigh that fog, even when it's too faint to see."

    Scientists find universe's missing matter while watching fast radio bursts shine through 'cosmic fog'

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31469771

    > Scientists find universe's missing matter while watching fast radio bursts shine through 'cosmic fog' > > Half of the universe's ordinary matter was missing — until now. > > Astronomers have used mysterious but powerful explosions of energy called fast radio bursts (FRBs) to detect the universe's missing "normal" matter for the first time. > > This previously missing stuff isn't dark matter, the mysterious substance that accounts for around 85% of the material universe but remains invisible because it doesn't interact with light. Instead, it is ordinary matter made out of atoms (composed of baryons) that does interact with light but has until now just been too dark to see.

    2
    texts @sh.itjust.works acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    Palindromes

    > \<Fabrice> GNAW ON NO WANG. > > \<Fabrice> This message brought to you by the Society of Lesbians for Palindrome Advancement

    0
    Wallet – The Jenkins

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/45941426

    > Source: https://thejenkinscomic.wordpress.com/2025/06/10/wallet/

    3
    texts @sh.itjust.works acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    RFC 1337 Protocol for Internet Relay Chat Taunt in use

    <Donut\[AFK]> HEY EURAKARTE <Donut\[AFK]> INSULT <Eurakarte> RETORT <Donut\[AFK]> COUNTER-RETORT <Eurakarte> QUESTIONING OF SEXUAL PREFERENCE <Donut\[AFK]> SUGGESTION TO SHUT THE FUCK UP <Eurakarte> NOTATION THAT YOU CREATE A VACUUM <Donut\[AFK]> RIPOSTE <Donut\[AFK]> ADDON RIPOSTE <Eurakarte> COUNTER-RIPOSTE <Donut\[AFK]> COUNTER-COUNTER RIPOSTE <Eurakarte> NONSENSICAL STATEMENT INVOLVING PLANKTON <Miles\_Prower> RESPONSE TO RANDOM STATEMENT AND THREAT TO BAN OPPOSING SIDES <Eurakarte> WORDS OF PRAISE FOR FISHFOOD <Miles\_Prower> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTENCE OF TERMS

    1
    Lemmy Federate @lemy.lol acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    Dealing with missing instances

    I was looking for a particular instance by it's not listed on the tool. I couldn't find info on what to do in this case. Is this something the instance admin must do?

    4
    Space: The Fungal Frontier

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31300820

    21
    chile hasn't changed

    cross-posted from: https://lemmings.world/post/12833385

    16
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)AC
    acockworkorange @mander.xyz
    Posts 63
    Comments 4.3K