D-Link refuses to patch yet another security flaw, suggests users just buy new routers — D-Link told users to replace NAS last week

I agree. Buy a new router that isn't Dlink.

The DSR-150 is still being sold on Amazon under the D-Link store. Why the hell would you end of life something you still sell.

Okay so the 2015 EOL ones, yeah I can understand telling the customer to update their shit. They shouldn't have to support nearly 10 year out of date stuff.

May 2024 EOL ones? Bruh. C'mon now.

There right you and i should just buy a new one

Of a diffrent brand

Be nice if companies had to open source firmware they are going to EoL.

Welp never buying anything D-Link ever again

Long ago, D-Link was good but then they sold the company. Just like Alienware, Farbreware, Oaklies, etc.

Our shit sucks. Buy more lol

there should be list of companies that should be avoided and why, its impossible to keep track of everything like this

I mean this is pretty standard in all industries regardless of whether it's a software flaw or a physical flaw in any other kind of product. What's the likelihood of a vacuum manufacturer replacing a part in a 15 year old product that had a 1 year warrantee even if it's a safety issue? Sure the delivery and installation is cheaper with software, but the engineering and development isn't, especially if the environment for building it has to be recreated.

but does it run openwrt?

e: no it doesn't, only one model had half-baked image made and available for download from some sketchy forum post made in 2014

I moved to an OPNsense router a couple of years ago and I’ve never looked back. Hell is shitty consumer routers.

No mercy from Low Level.

https://youtu.be/-vpGswuYVg8

Commodity hardware & open source software for the win.

When my Western Digital NAS was never going to get critical security patches, I was so freaking glad to find out that they just used software raid... I threw the HDDs in a Debian server and never looked back.

It's certainly nice to have things that are turn-key, but if you can find your way around any OS, just avoid proprietary everything.

Why do they say they’re prohibited to provide support? That a bad translation?

A bunch of juvenile D-Linkuents. Get it? D-Link? Nevermind....

a new non dlink router. Since the should be named f-link for a number of reasons.

Is DDWRT still a thing?

Perfect time for users to buy something that isn't D-Link then innit.

Same website (granted, different author, but), same inflammatory language, same vendor, referencing previous erroneous article...I'm not even gonna read this one. Just going to copy/paste my previous response from the previous post:

At a certain point it's the consumer's (and blog writer's) fault, and that's after EoL. Not patching a supported one and just getting rid of support, saying buy a newer one? Yeah, that's bad.

Continuing to not support an EoL model that you already don't support due to EoL (or even dropping support for an EoL model that no one expected you to support in the first place due to EoL)? Non-issue.

Instead of trusting DLink with an off the shelf NAS, it might be easier to build your own with a Raspberry Pi running openmediavault hooked up to a couple of USB hard drives. It's worked well for me for over 6 years now with no issue and could cost way less.

I hate to say it, but depending on manufacturers for this kind of stuff will always inevitably lead to these kinds of situations. This is why I always buy OpenWrt compatible routers and DIY my own NAS.

Over the years, I've experienced:

• Netgear refusing to patch bugs like their IPv6 firewall essentially letting all traffic through on the R7800
• QNAP shipping NASes with Intel CPUs that had clock drift issues so bad they essentially bricked themselves. They then refused to provide any kind of support for them.

After that I basically said, fuck it, I'll DIY my own and have been much happier ever since. If you have the know-how and the time, DIY is the way to go for longevity.

I think it's easy to blame a company for how they are handling this, but at the same time, if you're using a router that old you should probably already assume that it has vulnerabilities that haven't and probably won't be patched.