The weird thing is like, this whole situation could have been avoided if he just played the game normally rather than pretending to be some god gamer at it.
I use it for Plex/Jellyfin, it's the cheapest NVIDIA GPU that supports both AV1 encoding and decoding, even though Plex doesn't support AV1 yet IIRC it's still more futureproof that way. I picked it up for like around $200 on a sale, it was well worth it IMO.
64GB would be a nice amount of memory to have. I've been okay with 32GB so far thankfully.
Not anymore. My main self-hosting server is an i7 5960x with 32GB of ECC RAM, RTX 4060, 1TB SATA SSD, and 6x6TB 7200RPM drives.
I did used to host some services on like a $5 or $10 a month VPS, and then eventually a $40 a month dedi, though.
Plus folks of similar mental capability refrained from voting in the first place, when they could have prevented this.
Maybe it's just me but I don't think people should be saying or be allowed to say either of those two things. Neither of those two things are good for anyone.
Well that sucks. I haven't bought an XPS since the Dell XPS 15z like over a decade ago, but still, the idea that I could buy an XPS Developer Edition laptop and have it be Linux compatible without having to think about it was nice. Now I'm limited to ThinkPads and System76 plus whatever other compatible Clevos there are or maybe a Framework, which I guess is fine since I do own multiple ThinkPads.
Still, really weird decision.
True but the title said emulation so I had to correct OP anyway lol
They are similar, but generally emulators have a higher run-time cost - this is because they are "emulating" an entire system, not just translating system calls. By cost, I mean performance of course. Emulators typically simulate/mimic other hardware, whereas translation layers just convert the system calls to be run natively on your existing hardware (which means your CPU architecture must match, etc).
Wine is far faster than regular emulation would traditionally be.
I'm thinking this lawsuit will be more about how they wronged creators, and less about how they wronged customers. I don't expect there to be any justice or concern for the customers who were wronged. Therefore, I agree with TAG, I would worry that them losing would set a bad precedent, and possibly make it so that tampering with referral codes, tracking links, etc isn't allowed anymore because it hurts creators and sellers/companies, and thus that could outlaw adblockers entirely by extension which would not be great.
That's like worst-case scenario, though, I don't necessarily expect that to happen, but I think it's possible.
That's why I love Ubuntu/Mint too.
It's boring stable.
I've been tempted to try out other distros, but honestly, when it works as well as it does for me, it's too hard for me to give it up for something that might not be as stable of an experience.
I agree, but, to be fair, WINE is not an emulator, it's a translation layer. It may seem like it doesn't matter but it's an important distinction.
Yes, it sounds like they were violating GPL.
I've literally seen advertisements for products that I was talking about but explicitly did not search for or type or anything on any device. All I did was talk about it in real life.
It's literally a thing that happens, I have seen it happen first-hand.
True, that's a good point, they likely try to make as much money as possible in as many different ways.
I feel like the majority of DE developers are just back-end developers, which like, of course that's not going to be a great user experience lol
I thought they made it from selling user data.
Well, presumably people are in the gym because they're signing up, then they proceed to not show up for the rest of the year lol