'We tried everything': Another long-running Calif. music festival is canceled
'We tried everything': Another long-running Calif. music festival is canceled
www.sfgate.com
Access to this page has been denied
25 comments
-
-
-
I was at the last Desert Daze at JT and thought it was fine. Maybe it was “too little, too late” though.
I’m curious what sketchy plays you’re talking about.
-
-
-
Festivals fucking suck now that they hit the mainstream zeitgeist. Everyone wants to be tomorrow world without doing any of the hard work.
-
This applies:
Q: How do you make a small fortune with exhibitions, events and shows?
A: Start with a large one.
-
Meanwhile I was stuck with burners while driving back from the store today... Is it just marketing? Although I guess burning man didn't sell so well, either.
25 comments
Tried everything except getting better acts and lowering ticket prices.
Better acts increase cost. Lower ticket prices reduce income.
The real problem here is that too many people simply can't afford "luxuries" like a festival visit anymore.
The lineup was pretty solid, especially if you look at the full lineup, but that price is a bit much for a single day festival.
We just keep getting fucked. I paid 160 for bonnaroo 2006 tickets because I got the first wave, I think the final wave was 190. That’s with fees and all. Adjusted for inflation thats $250-290. But that was a 4 day festival with Radiohead headlining, beck, tom petty, god tons of sick bands. It was imo the peak of bonnaroo
Now this is $300 for a single day? It’s more after inflation for 1/4 the festival? I get that there’s savings in running a festival for multiple days so it’s not like cutting a 3 day to a 1 day means costs are cut by 2/3rd, but from my perspective as a consumer it looks like I am paying ~300% more than I did 18 years ago even after adjusting for inflation because I just don’t get nearly as much value for my dollars.
I remember that bonnaroo and being like “Jesus this is so much money” and here we are with a show that’s 53% more expensive in raw dollar amount and 1/4 the length. Sigh.
Was worth it though, that Radiohead set was insane. They played for over 2 hours. Also a few months later I got tickets for daft punks alive 2007 tour - $50 plus fees (which were like $14). At the time I thought it was the most absurd shit, so expensive. I almost didn’t go. I’m glad I did because it was the most insane concert I’ve ever seen in my life. But it’s funny because nowadays finding a major act that puts out tickets for $65 with fees is actually fairly tough.
Actually…. I’d pay $300 to see that 2006 lineup.
Jack White is good but there is no way I would ever pay $300 to see him.
Jack White alone? No. But there's also a bunch of other good acts IMO.
Liz Phair? De La Soul? Sounds pretty good to me.
Unpopular opinion but the people who keep paying $300-$1000 a ticket to take shrooms and cosplay Woodstock are the problem.
They're just Fyre fests that didn't hit rock bottom yet.
Taking shrooms at a concert is a total waste of shrooms. Screw those people lol
Maybe, but I don't like this whole "not automatically directing cynicism towards real estate companies sucking up everyone's money" business.
Off we go to stomp the leeches. Bring your rainboots, for they are fat.
I mean, the reason is we have no money. Land, food, health, whatever.
Marc Rebillet and Thundercat had sets too, plus Hamilton Morris was going to give a lecture. The line up was pretty stacked overall and early bird tickets were $250, which isn't unreasonable for a 3 day festival.
I did not know Marc Rebillet made music other than my alarm song
Don't diss cigarettes after sex
Huh... That price is okay compared to a lot of festivals. The line up is also very good, The Mars Volta, Converge, DFA1979A, De La Soul, ect.
https://static.pollstar.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/DesertDazeAdmat.jpg
I could not possibly afford tickets like this, but between Jack White, De La Soul, The Mars Volta and Liz Phair, it would be worth the price to me.