Oh, you're seriously gonna pretend that moloch is better than baal is??? The hellfire demons eating civilians at random would be soo much worse if moloch were running things.
Voting third party (i don't care if jesus promised to end the hellfire demons, his party won't win, and is just a spoiler for the baal vote) - a vote for moloch.
Not prefacing a criticism of baal's administration (cmon, we all know he realistically can't stop the hellfire demons) without first saying you'll vote for him? Also a vote for moloch.
Not voting - a vote for moloch.
Going to the bathroom? Believe it or not, also a vote for moloch.
Even on the minor, basest of chances it gains enough traction to make a tangible difference despite both parties working against it, how could a Socialist party make meaningful change without the other apparatus of the State like the military and legislative branches getting in the way?
Allende taught us what relying on electoralism will get you, even if you win.
When presented with the choice between the arsonist who wants to burn your house down slowly vs the arsonist who wants to burn your house down quickly, choose the arsonist who wants to burn your house down slowly, so you have more opportunities to escape or mitigate the damage.
Edit:
Why the downvotes? How is this analogy inconsistent with what was just described?
I would - but what children?
All have already been sacrificed to "the economy and profits", we are waiting for people to be born to immediately sacrifice them bcs we are so much indebted to the great "the economy and profits".
All hail "the economy and profits", may it's economy enslave us, and it's profits get redistributed away from us.
As a lifelong Baal voter I am now voting for Moloch. How can anyone with a conscience still vote for Baal after he was convicted of sacrificing adults?