Programmer Humor @programming.dev Sjmarf @sh.itjust.works 7mo ago

You wouldn’t get it

41 comments

Ha. Cause there's no getter. I get it. I think?
- I get it.
  
  No you don’t; there’s no getter.
  
  Oh, now I get it.
  
  Wait...
- It’s also an inside Joke
Upon reflection, I do get the joke now.
- This one gets it
They don't call me AbstractJokerAdapterFactoryProxy for nothin'
Where are your gods now?

public static Joke getTheJoke(Meme yourMeme) { Field jokeField = Meme.class.getDeclaredField("joke"); jokeField.setAccessible(true); return (Joke) jokeField.get(yourMeme); }
- Is it Java? It looked like ~~Microsoft Java~~ C# to me...
  
  public static void Main(string[] args) { var meme = new Meme(); var joke = GetTheJoke(meme); } public static Joke GetTheJoke(Meme theMeme) { var memeType = typeof(Meme); var jokeField = memeType.GetField("Joke", BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance); return (Joke)jokeField.GetValue(theMeme); }
  
  Frankly it's been a while since I wrote either one. I just assumed Java because of the naming convention, and I didn't see anything I took as obviously un-Java in the class definition
  
  There isn't an unnecessary level of capitalization; seems to be regular Java with Allman braces.
  
  Because C# is a Java clone
  
  If you have to cast your joke it isn't funny?
public Joke Joke { private get; set; }
i hate this programming pattern with a passion.
- Setters and Getters?
  
  yes.
  
  Where getter?
Is it possible to get the joke at runtime using the spectre exploit?
- Not required. Looks like Java, just use reflection.
Stop making private jokes and start posting them publicly. We wanna laugh too, ya selfish bastid.
throw new SameJokeException();
now i get it, do i?

41 comments