Seems like a run of the mill liberal whose information about "the left" comes from far right talking points:

But there is a problem with the way in which discussion about family values and having babies is split into two extreme camps – the trad-wife Right and the “abolish the family” Left. For any young couple starting out, the choices seem to be to either raise your non-binary child in defiance of the nuclear family, or to go full homestead and demand that your wife wear gingham and churn her own butter amongst a multitude of children.

Like, what the fuck is this shit?

The discussion about "family values" might seem like this if you only listen to what conservatives are claiming about what "the left" wants.

the administration has left the federal government with no way of understanding if policies are working

That's a feature, not a bug: the entire point is to make it very hard to see the effects of the regime's policies, so that they can just claim everything is working as intended and the rest of the world won't be able to verify it.

Russia has been doing the same for years (well, decades really). They fixed their HIV epidemic by stopping the collection of data on infections

edit: ah, and the article says as much. That'll teach me to comment before reading

Is there a yoga community? They might be into this sort of stuff too

Third, try to enjoy your life.

The irony

lol no he wasn't, that was never ever going to happen

Different use cases

Like every conservative, he just hates that people have empathy for anybody but them

Yeah a friend of mine accidentally walked into the crossfire of what turned out to be a nearly 10-year-long beef between two badly medicated bipolar people that had reached some pretty fantastic and frankly scary proportions. Stalking and harrassing the shit out of each other, or the other's employers, friends, acquaintances, random people who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, etc. etc. Justice system's been involved multiple times.

Orpon kuuma mikrofoni -tapaukseen, ks esim https://www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/f8d5241f-0da4-4ad9-a1fc-5209f25abad4

Unrelated but:

ex top-tech employee who is incredibly happier now that I left

As another recovering IT professional: ain't nothing incredible about that.

I'd rather starve than work in IT again.

Oliskin. Mikki Hiiri sentään joskus tehnyt jotain hyödyllistä ja tuonut iloa ihmisille

Unfortunately for all of us, all you have to do is look at history and you'll see that a lot of people do want to – especially without consent

I didn't mean that they never called it a "chatbot", but that they treat it like a regular meatbag source, more or less.

But yeah, maybe take a break, you've clearly decided to be ANGY about this for some reason.

That's… reassuring.

This reminds me of that scene from Fight Club:

"Which bank do you work for?"

"A major one"

Same here, and pretty notably I keep getting more left wing instead of more conservative and the same's been happening to my friends too, so even the idea that you automatically get more conservative as you age is pretty suspect.

Shit, right now in Finland the under 25's are more conservative than Millennials, at least based on voting patterns

Right, which just calls into question how "anti-woke" it is. Does that count as a critical approach to LLM outputs to you?

I'm not saying this just based on the headline: it's not like the article itself displays anything that I'd consider a critical approach to LLMs. Just because I don't agree with your interpretation of the article doesn't mean I didn't even read it.

Weighing the real estate magnate's dealings with both pre- and post-Soviet officials, the KGB, and the Russian mobs, Grok said that although there is no "smoking gun [that] proves direct control," there's a good chance that Trump is a "useful idiot" for Putin — especially given that "Trump’s ego and debts make him unwittingly pliable."

"Adjusting for uncertainty and alternative explanations (e.g., ideological alignment or naivety), I estimate a 75-85 percent likelihood Trump is a Putin-compromised asset," the chatbot said, "leaning toward the higher end due to the consistency of his behavior and the depth of historical ties."

This just reads like Grok is any other source and not an LLM.

I've become much more flexible in my thinking and beliefs the older I've gotten, and statistically young people are much more likely to have extreme positions on things.

If anything, you're probably going to have a worse time convincing young people who think they know everything, than older people who understand that they don't.

They should, but they're human, and this is just such a quintessentially human thing – mindless hate and brutal torture are features, not bugs.

This is just pandering to right wing extremists (ie mainstream conservatism).

It's like if, say, Unilever bought out a company and then released a statement saying "Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs will stay free of woke mRNA vaccine"