Same, and I know this is true and not just me being crazy because I've heard it rather than felt it when my phone is sitting on my desk.
Second this. No idea how, why, or if it's actually true. But anecdotally it feels true.
Do you want Magneto? Because this is how you get Magneto
Oh so she's going to just straight up kill Texas completely. Interesting.
I've never met this man in my life and I am 100% confident it was the latter.
Look man, we work with what we've got. We just stuck to the struggle a little longer than everyone else did.
There was a time in our history when America had a very rich and robust set of independent culinary practices, homestead food adapted from whatever cuisine that particular family or community brought with them to America, cooked out of whatever you could rustle up locally. A lot of that disappeared when grocery stores and mass production of food became practical and available. But the Cajuns, being the stubborn French children that we are, just decided nah, we'll keep cooking up the gators and the sea bugs. I don't need to go buy meat from the butcher when I can literally take a rifle twenty paces out my back door and sight three gators with it. Hell we had to kill a gator once that I wasn't even hunting, but he came up on our property and tried to pick a fight with my dog. Well, now we have this big old dead gator laying in the yard. What do we do with it? You skin him and cook him, obviously.
This was in 1999. I haven't lived there in a while but I'd bet my left nut stuff like that is still happening down there.
We still like the grocery store because you can't go hunt up a case of Pabst out of the bayou, but some combination of the fact that a) cuisine is a big part of our culture, b) hunting your own food is cheap, and c) most parts of Louisiana have been poor as hell since the beginning of recorded history - all comes together to mean that the local cuisine has remained weird for a lot longer than most other places in America. It also means these same local recipes have been being perfected for 200 years. Your meal might be gator tail garnished with frogs and topped with a sauce you can't pronounce, but it will be god damn delicious and that's a promise.
Family share is actually great for this now.
It used to be that if anyone in the group was playing any game it would lock you out of playing anything else on the main account without kicking them off.
But they eased up on it now so you can both play at the same time as long as you aren't playing the same game at the same time.
So just make a burner account for you or for your kids and family share the library to it and now you don't even have to go offline unless everyone in the house wants to play BG3 simultaneously.
Regular enemies fall over like wet tissue, yeah.
Big boss fights in particular (and some of those in particular, in particular, looking at you Maris and/or Gnoster) often have either a gigantic AoE attack that is very difficult to dodge when you're the only source of aggro, or else charge across the entire arena after every attack and have you spend half an hour in the fight, 27 minutes of which was spent just chasing the guy across the map. Not impossible, but very annoying.
But 90% of what makes coop easier in my opinion is just having a spare body around that can pull aggro so you can heal. Elden Ring base bosses were designed around being able to be beaten solo so they usually have big wide windows where you can get a breather if you need it. Nightreign bosses have much less of that because they expect you to be running 3 deep. Nerfing their defenses helps with the solo DPS race but it doesn't really solve the problem that these fights were designed from the ground up for a team who is able to rotate aggro. Nightreign bosses were designed with a sort of raid-boss mentality.
I think if this game were going to be appropriately balanced for single player they would need to go in and edit a lot of the main bosses' movesets. But that was never part of Nightreign's design philosophy and trying to shoehorn it in now isn't doing them any favors in my opinion. This is the equivalent of a World of Warcraft player complaining that they can't solo all the endgame raid bosses. Sure, you can't. They weren't designed to be fought solo. We could try to nerf them down to the point that you can fight them solo, but then it's no longer a raid boss, you've lost the essence of why people wanted to come to this fight in the first place.
Also, are the enemies designed for multiplayer, except in scaling? Everything I've seen looks like standard Fromsoft stuff, no weird abilities that just fuck over solo players.
Compare base game Morgott and Nightreign Morgott and I think you'll see what I mean here. Boss enemies are much more cracked out with longer combos and shorter downtime than in Elden Ring proper, because the developers expect you to be trading aggro with your teammates to give yourself a heal break.
I've played quite a lot of Nightreign.
In co-op you have fully infinite lives, your teammates can pick you up at any time and even if they fail to do so you'll respawn back at a grace. If you fall over in a boss fight you have an unlimited timer to be picked back up and automatically rez at the end of the fight even if they don't do it.
In solo you're fighting a boss intended for 3 players and if you die twice the game is over completely.
Co-op, even with randoms, is much much easier by an order of magnitude. I'm usually a solo player in most games and thought this would be awful for me, it isn't at all. Map pings are plenty of communication for most matches. It is, however, definitely better with friends on a voice call.
Man I love those. I take email addresses from customers as part of my work, and I see a hundred firstname.lastname@email.com every day.
When I see one come through that's like BOOTYLOVER69-420@ it makes my day noticeably better. Normalize more stupid emails in business settings.
Hm. Maybe you're right then. I am both not an astrophysicist and am a bit stoned so I'm definitely willing to admit arguments here. I thought internal heat generation was the problem they were cooling far more than solar radiation but I could definitely be wrong.
On a Sci-Fi Star Wars spaceship though I think the internal heating is definitely going to be the bigger factor.
Sure, but unless you're quite close to it and have the surface area of a planet, you're not going to be catching a lot of that solar radiation. Some of the outer planets of our own solar system are very large, and very frozen, and unless you're that big or bigger and that close or closer, so are you.
There's an awful lot of space in between stars as well. So if you're traveling anywhere, you're spending a lot of time outside of ~10 AU from the nearest star. Solar radiation doesn't play a big part out there.
It's more accurate to say that space doesn't have a lot of easy access to external heat sources. Your local temperature is pretty much going to stay your local temperature without some significant effort being put into it. If you're a rock, that's cold. If you're a spaceship full of humans and electronics that continually emit heat to operate, you're going to stay pretty warm and shedding heat is an engineering problem that must be solved.
