remotelove @ remotelove @lemmy.ca

Posts

129

Comments

3,160

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

One of the other notable scenes with her sister was in the steel factory, when the T1000 was mimicking Sarah. The T1000 was actually played by Linda Hamilton and it was her sister with the shotgun.

Let me rub it in then... ;)

That is Sarah Connor from Terminator 1

It might be for driving multiple cell phones for click-farms.

For anyone wondering, that's Sarah Connors dream from Terminator 2 right before the city gets nuked.

Eat a bag of dicks.

Glad I could help!

You can totally be the nice guy in this case. Imma just call a spade a spade. I suspect that this account and those comments are intended to drive people to YouTube. The first thing people do when dealing with controversy is check a person's profile. The first thing they will see on that profile is basically an ad and self-promotion. Maybe I am looking too deep into this, but when you read his comments the way he narrates, it kinda clicked about what the motive might be.

I do totally understand your point. Mental health issues are absolutely real and should be addressed. How much we can do about that here on Lemmy is debatable.

Bottom one, but "sectors" without the additional dashes and the same font size. Keep the "A" format that is actually an upside-down "V". The background logo or badge thing implies some kind of coalition or structured group of some kind.

The intent of my suggestion is to make the title appear to lean forward just a hair, putting more focus on "uncharted" first and forcing the eye to drift down. In the above picture, I read "sectors" first. ("uncharted" implies something mysterious, where as "sectors" doesn't mean much.)

I also happen to be viewing this in grey scale as really should be sleeping and not typing on my phone. That has the unfortunate effect of making the characters under-nose shadows look like really weird mustaches.

That's my interpretation, so take with a grain of salt.

If you legitimately believe what you said is true and coherent, you should probably find someone impartial to talk to about these ideas.

So I went to OPs YouTube channel and these posts seem to be a continuation of the M.I.B.-like persona/almost alien in a human body kinda thing. It's... interesting. In that context, saying things like "NASA fake" is perfectly in character.

Not trying to be critical of anyone's personality, but the suit, tie and glasses really hint at an act.

I can't see the modlog on my client, but the the other person said it was the most unmedicated comment he had seen that day. I thought it was hysterical, given the context.

It was likely implying that you should be taking meds, not so much that you didn't take any today.

Punctuation can change context and/or grammar, but I'll meet you in the middle on that one. I'll also just keep telling myself that it was an intentional mistake by the editors to trigger real grammar nazis.

which is it's

And bad grammar too. Tsk, tsk.

That would mean the coffee supports Unicode better than my Lemmy client. (The "i" is broken for me.)

ǝᴉp oʇ ʇuɐʍ I

It's the back of the phone, based on the picture.

An epoxy might work to keep any more glass from cracking, but I am doubtful. If you can somehow make a mold or something to contain the epoxy while it sets, that might help. Sanding off the excess epoxy sounds tricky as well.

I guess in reality, any glue should work to help secure the rest of the glass for a little bit of time. Also in reality, the glass is already compromised so it's anyone's guess how long any fix would keep the damage from spreading. To simulate something like a windshield repair, you would need to forcefully inject the glue or expoxy into the damaged area to fill any developing cracks completely.

Any kind of fix still probably needs to get covered with a beefy phone case afterwards.

It's hard to say what a decent fix would be or how it might cause issues with future repairs without a hands-on look at the damage. The best option is to replace the back of the phone whenever that becomes possible. (I suspect any glues or epoxies would interfere with that.)

I've interacted with him/her a time or two and there haven't been any extreme negative experiences. I actually kinda got a kick out of watching their effort to boycott .ml (which I total am down with) and troll the admins over there. (Propagandists get no love from me.)

I have seen a questionable post or two related to advertising, but it was in a dedicated community for the company. Not a fan of that here, but it's easy enough to block and it wasn't flooding unrelated communities.

That is who the name is based off of, yes. (I asked a couple of years ago.) However, I can't remember if it's actually based off of Stamets from Star Trek, which doesn't really matter, because the name is still based off of Stamets from the real world.

Brosnan was great but Sean Connery was impossible to beat.

Press stunt to get attention on older cards, maybe?