Well yeah, but if this is the continent why the long legs to signify ownership? This justifiably confused me into thinking this was a political graphic incorrectly labeled as Europe instead of EU.
So I suppose this graphic really isn't showing anything at all, as it's neither politically or geographically accurate.
When I did it, keeping a dream journal helped a lot, so i could work out when i was in a dream. Often when I did work it out, either the dream would end, or change without my direction or I'd wake up.
Eventually you learn to... I don't really know how to phrase it but like, not disturb your unconscious narrating brain, and instead just sort of insert small changes.
You can imagine it a bit like improv acting or a DM in an RPG session. It says: you're in school without your pants on and you say "and then a dinosaur comes in the room" and your narrative brain sort of goes with it, and rolls that into the story somehow.
I eventually stopped doing it, it's a lot less magic than people like to make out in my opinion, it's much more like telling yourself a story in your sleep, and it being very visually and emotionally believable. It was fun though. The last time I did it, I kept trying to get my narrative brain to say that I died, it was interesting seeing how ridiculous it would get to avoid having that happen. (E.g. "then I get shot" "ok, the bullet turns out to be jelly and splats on your face", "it's acid jelly", "ok, a bucket of soapy water drops on you and flushes all the acid off of you", "the bucket is full of sharks", etc....) funny, but really just imagining stuff in your sleep.
Though in all seriousness, this is nothing like my experience of lucid dreaming where I was highly aware it was a dream, it felt more like collaborating with my imagination "now I can fly" and my dreaming mind would make that happen "suddenly I can't fly" and I'm plummeting to earth, it was all very obviously a dream to me, though still thoroughly enjoyable.
It does list "the condition of being [...] unaware" in the definitions you quoted. I think it's fair to say ignorance can mean being unaware, but ignorance can at times also signify that it is intentional, or that a person is choosing to ignore information.
I think you've confused our conversation with the other conversations you are having here. I started talking to you when you responded to the hypothetical question "if there were only X and y candidates as options, which would you vote for", to which you responded with something along the lines of: "neither, you can say 'none of the above', you know?"
I'm refuting that with you, voting neither in that hypothetical situation is not saying "none of the above' it's saying 'either of the above '.
I see you're involved in lots of conversations in this thread, where many people disagree with you on points more directly related to the actual situation in hand, so I can understand if you've mixed me up with some other context you have elsewhere, but I really don't care about your country's election or your candidates or who wins (I care a little, but I am not directly involved or affected), I'm just disagreeing with the evidently false statement you've made above. Hopefully this has cleared up the conversation.
I'm not talking about the narrative you've got in your head about what statements you're making with your actions, I'm also not including what you suppose or predict the result of the vote to be, that's not logical or helpful..
I'm talking about simple actions and consequences, let me lay this out more simply:
No vote: no change for either candidates chances of success == no preference
A vote for either: a change for both candidates chances of success (slightly improved and slightly decreased) == a preference
I laugh at myself, am I both or neither, or some new group?