No, Microsoft did not state ‘strong AI demand’ in Q1 2025 — the FT is wrong
David Gerard @ dgerard @awful.systems Posts 849Comments 2,447Joined 2 yr. ago

Scientific peer review by AI — with its own cryptocurrency! As promoted in Nature
Tom Chivers, the science writer who stanned hard for the rationalists and Siskind and started writing for Unherd, is doing gender critical podcasts now
new Foreign Policy piece on the bitcoin reserve, not by me but quoting me extensively
Ilya Sutskever, ex-OpenAI, gets $2b funding not to release anything until he has ‘super intelligence’
LA Times ‘bias meter’ goes live, pushes AI slop without journalistic review
Google: We’ll reach Artificial General Intelligence if you slackers just show face in the office 60 hours a week
Feeding the dreams of AI venture capital: if you want the VC money, just promise magic
how will Free Our Feeds free our feeds? They'll take the Bluesky firehose and put it ... on a blockchain
PhD student expelled for using AI sues university, files pro-se suit using ChatGPT
I've emailed Microsoft Investor Relations to clarify what they meant and why they didn't just say "percent" if they meant "percent". But if it had been 16 percent, they'd have been yelling it from the rooftops, and they haven't been.