• YouTube (radio drama channels) - there are some fantastic plays.
• podcasts using antennapod on F-Droid.

I'm not interested in pills, black or otherwise. Single 'l' - as in beer - maybe! Haha

Live and let live. If individuals are obviously not leading a compassionate life then keep away, but mass labelling an entire set of individuals that you do not know as incels - noting the hateful meaning of that word - is the very definition of bigotry.

I though we'd got rid of labelling people for their dating preferences when being lesbian, gay or bi stopped being particularly note-worthy in the glam-rock era. It's a shame that you're still behaving like those knuckle draggers of the 1970s with a different target.

You have given two options: aro or incel. There is an enormous third option which is unavailable to anyone but you, I guess.

Apparently I'm not allowed to use the word 'bigot' for a bigot. You don't define my language use.

That is very obviously not what anyone is saying. Not dating because you are not interested in dating is different than not dating because you're down on yourself and blame the world (and those of the gender you find attractive) for creating your situation.

Yes it is. People who are not into dating for that reason (aro) are explicitly being called incels by you in your reply to me. Anyone who isn't dating without being aro is an incel. You're a bigot.

You're the kind of person who would be calling a guy gay (but using the really derogatory terms, fag .. ) because he doesn't have a girlfriend in the last century.

I'm old and feel sorry for people who just want to be left alone for their own reasons. Why is this so called liberal - which in my mind means live and let live - baying-mob so much more vindictive and nasty than I could have ever imagined (rhetoric question).

It's not just UK, but Europe-wide soon. I imagine that the various (other) -eyes countries will be joining with similar legislation.

And then The law of unintended consequences will strike.

TIL all aromantic (aro) persons are misogynists (but not misandrists) by reading the comments.

Thank-you.

Quite a few people have come to their senses. It's taken thirty years but .. hey .. Rome not built in a day.

That's really well put.

I'd add, if I may, a small piece of wisdom from Muhammad Ali: "A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life."

I take that as advice to have a willingness to re-evaluate one's views on a daily basis.

I'm curious. What is your definition of evil?

Voting this century.

What things are and what the masses choose to call them, and use them for, are usually two different things.

Asking the masses to understand a complex subject for themselves, and ascribe to it appropriate nomenclature, when all they actually want is something that echoes what they already think with more eloquence is folly.

Reference: social media - a method to collect personal data from the masses to use against them, which they willingly and greedily supply, without recompense.

I should withdraw my original comment. I spent a while re-researching the original intent, the Heller case and some of the subsequent cases to its current interpretation.

I believe it was originally intended to prevent federal overreach. Except that when there was a belief by some people that that had happened and there was an invasion of the capital. That confused me. I don't know what the rights and wrongs were - apparently the alleged overreach wasn't adjudged to be severe by anyone.

I'd suggest no-one ever dual-boot Windows with anything. There are to many mishaps when Windows takes it into their head to fuck the bootloader.

Put the OS into a VM. If you only use Windows for one app put Windows into the VM. Otherwise put Linux into the VM until you find you're mostly using Linux.

Unless you have an old PC laying around ..

Next week, the sandwich sandwich:

Just the raw ingredients of bread and butter pudding, (minus seasoning and dried fruit) pushed together.

YSK that Americans will liberally (!) provide, carry and use their weapons for everything except the second amendment intended purpose.

Because they don't need to. As Zuckerberg himself said: people will voluntarily give all kinds of private information to corporates without being asked or by the gentlest of requests.

I'm not sure that you meant born because everyone is taking it too literally and it doesn't help make a decent question.

Document everything I can think of for future people and put it in a place that someone will find out but is not that open to be degradation.

I know how impossible this sounds.