Ada @ ada @lemmy.blahaj.zone

Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone

---

Read more

Posts

399

Comments

4,302

Joined

3 yr. ago

Moderating

---

The latter

Does ATproto have a larger number of users than ActivityPub or does Bluesky have a larger number of users? Once you take Bluesky itself out of the picture, ATProto isn't exactly a super popular protocol...

My relationship with gender didn't so much manifest that way.

Before I came out and accepted myself, I openly told myself I "should have been a girl", but I also believed I wasn't, and that was that. I didn't really feel anything at the idea of femininity. That was my experience of feeling gender

It's because of your app. Login with default lemmy UI in your browser and you'll be able to create it.

Done!

It's not about what you consider gender neutral. Someone asked you to show them a bit of respect and use terms they're comfortable with. It's not hard.

FYI, that cul-de-sac is from Pluribus, and it was built specifically for the show

That cul-de-sac was built for specifically for Pluribus, so that they don't end up with the Breaking Bad situation where people throw pizzas on the roof of the house that was used as Walter and Skylers house in the show. It wasn't in Breaking Bad.

My D&D group started off with one token girl. Then he transitioned. So I became the token girl.

lbz ignores downvotes in any case

The thing is though, no one actually changes their opinion because Musk spouts contradictory bullshit. His fellow transphobes just see him pushing transphobia, and don't care what he's actually saying. For them as well, the point is the hate. The words are just as meaningless, whether it's their words or someone elses. The only thing that matters, is that it pushes hate.

For people that are already trans allies, his words don't change anything.

And for people who are on the fence, who don't know how to feel about trans folk and their rights, musks words won't change anything either. The thing that turns fences sitters in to supporters is seeing the human face of trans people. It's the experience of trans people shifting from a hypothetical talking point in to real people, who are impacted by the hate. And again, that has very little to do with the words people use.

No. Musk and other transphobes don't actually believe what they believe because of the reasons they state. They believe what they believe, and say whatever feels right in the moment to support their hate, and don't care in the slightest if it contradicts another of their beliefs somewhere else. The hate is the point. The words are just window dressing.

Of the four real instances in that image, there are three different software platforms.

This is just regular moderation, though.

It's using the existing tool, but making a small portion of them (approving applications) available to a much larger pool of people

it doesn't resolve the question I raised about what happens when two instances disagree about whether an account is a bot.

If the instance that hosts it doesn't think it's a bot, then it stays, but is blocked by the instance that does think its a bot.

And if the instance that thinks its a bot also hosts it, it gets shut down.

That is regular fediverse moderation

Yeah, but that's after the fact, and after their content has federated to other instances.

It doesn't solve the bot problem, but just plays whack a mole with them, whilst creating an ever large amount of moderation work, due to it federating to multiple instances.

Solving the bot problem means stopping the content from federating, which either means stopping the bot accounts from registering, or stopping them from federating until they're known to be legit.

I mean, approving users, you just let your regular established users approve instance applications. All they need to do is stop the egregious bots from getting through. And if there is enough of them, the applications will be processed really quickly. If there is any doubt about an application, let them through, because they can be caught afterwards. And historical applications are already visible, and easily checked if someone has a complaint.

And if you don't like the idea of trusted users being able to moderate new accounts, you can tinker with that idea. Let accounts start posting before their application has been approved, but stop their content from federating outwards until an instance staff member approves them. It would let people post right away without requiring approval, and still get some interaction, but it would mitigate the damage that bots can do, by containing them to a single instance.

My point is, there are options that could be implemented. The status quo of open sign ups, with a growing number of bots doesn't have to be the unquestioned approach going forward.

How do you figure that? There's nothing centralised about it

Make sign ups require approval and create a "trusted user" permission level that lets the regular trusted users on the instance see and process pending sign up requests and suspend/delete brand new spam accounts (say under 24 hours old) that slip through the cracks. You can have dozens of people across all timezones capable of approving requests as the are made, and capable of shutting down the bots that slip through.

Boom, bot problem solved

It sounds like depersonalisation to me. A form of dissociation.

Lots of trans people deal with it when they're closeted. I know I did.