Nah, the majority of people can decide to outlaw actions in a democratic state. Under consistent understandings of intellectual property, people should have the ability to prevent their likeness becoming a product unless it actual falls under fair use. Like most things AI, pre existing IP laws make most current uses of AI illegal. The only reason it's still getting pushed is thanks to the rule of law being secondary to the power of money.
The result is that anti deepfake laws aren't authoritarian unless you consider liberal democracy to be fundamentally authoritarian (which is fair, but only if you're consistent about it).
Clearly not a majority. My guess is they're too scared that they'll lose some competitive advantage by not greenlighting every misguided use of generative AI
It'll take time for good people to lose the "anti-violence" dogma, but it'll happen; if only because it because it becomes an unavoidable fact of life.
nah, it's over. It was gg for elections in November, and so many people like you didn't realize this. It's to late to prevent this. All we can do now is rebuild.
I wish, but I don't have faith that enough liberal interests will give a shit. They've done little to stand against fascism and have sided with corporate interests every time.
Yet another instance of Trump shooting his own government in the foot so that way he has slightly more power in comparison. In his efforts to fill the government with loyalists, he weakens the very thing he paid money for. The long term consequences probably won't hit him, but will doom the future of the America.
Her beard stubble used a Totem of Undying, an item from Minecraft that prevents you from dying whenever you take lethal damage.