Do you think the ruling class wants to see its own children fight in the coliseum for sport?
The students union exists to put pressure on the university, but at least in the UK it is essentially toothless, as the only thing universities care about is fees being paid, and if you don't pay you are kicked out.
Anything they do at the request of the SU is essentially voluntary on the part of the university.
That's why showing the expected outcome is also very important. It can feel very verbose, but the number of times I've been unclear as to if something worked because the documentation goes on immediately to the next step without demonstrating the success/failure states is extremely frustrating.
It definitely can, but it won't if you're looking for it
So their tax is lower and their public services are better? Makes you wonder where all the US tax revenue is going...
Can you explain what this is, so that I don't have to google it and end up on a list?
Less
Good things have happened to Elon, therefore he must be a good person, otherwise my worldview is destroyed and there is no point being good.
This 100%, too many musk fanboys don't understand how much he is actually hindering innovation.
Even at SpaceX they make more progress when he isn't involved.
Makes sense, but to me going from 1.5% to 1.3% on a prediction for 3 years in the future seems like a pretty insignificant difference, especially since it will probably change between now and then.
£22B for the NHS is the best news I've heard in a while, and even then it is only barely keeping it in line with previous investment as a % of GDP. This investment is sorely needed so if taxes have to go up to pay for it they have to go up. If we want growth rejoin the EU and then our taxes can come down again, but none of the major parties are willing to have that conversation.
Following the budget announcement in the UK, why is the media obsessed with the predicted growth being 0.2% lower, instead of applauding the much needed investment in our public services? Does it really matter that much?
One of Harris and Trump is going to be the president. Sorry but that is the reality, the time for getting a better candidate has passed.
It is time to pick which one you want. If you don't vote you don't care so you accept either outcome.
Voting is not and should not be wholly endorsing the person, but securing the best outcome from the options. You want better options then go into politics yourself.
What's the joke?
Thanks mate, edited
I get your frustration, but it is really important to keep spelling it out. I find it very frustrating to be on the receiving and of lines like I'm tired of explaining it to you people
when I am earnestly engaging in a conversation for the first time, so I think it's best to give people the benefit of the doubt that maybe they really don't know, especially on forums where people other than those commenting will read it also.
Because Harris is open to ceasefire pressure and Trump want's Israel to 'Finish the job'.
One's hands aren't morally clean if you don't vote and Trump wins. Not voting is functionally equivalent to voting for whoever wins, and if he does win with a low turnout then those who didn't vote are responsible for whatever happens.
They could have renewed it at £2 and still increased the funding without taking it from people who rely on public transport.
No false dichotomies please.
The cap has been increased by 150% from £2 to £3.
Please under no circumstances do trains.
You seem to be in the camp of believing the hype. See this write up of an apple paper detailing how adding simple statements that should not impact the answer to the question severely disrupts many of the top model's abilities.
In Bloom's taxonomy of the 6 stages of higher level thinking I would say they enter the second stage of 'understanding' only in a small number of contexts, but we give them so much credit because as a society our supposed intelligence tests for people have always been more like memory tests.
If the immediate danger is the car, couldn't they shoot the tires instead of the driver? I don't understand how you can claim to not have intended to kill a person whom you aimed a firearm at and then pulled the trigger.