Skip Navigation
*Permanently Deleted*
  • It's an apt comparison, there aren't many examples so on the nose about deliberately destabilizing secular groups and Islamist groups filling the power vacuum, only to become a more violent threat.

    If you want you could compare it to the allied powers starving the Spanish Republic of resources, enabling the rise of the Nazis, but it's a bit of a stretch.

  • *Permanently Deleted*
  • Also Hamas was empowered by the Israeli state by the distruction of secular opposition.

    Not disimilar to how the US armed the Taliban & created a power vacuum for them to fill

  • Did we kill Linux's killer feature?
  • flatpaks are all updated at once, just like distro packages, so yeah you might need to commands, but that's still very different to having each application update itself (and the security hell implied by that)

    Also I think pkcon can manage your updates across various backends (unless you are on Arch, where I think there are both technical & ideological objections to having a simple tool that just works)

  • Anyone else feel like ~99% of their life was kind of wasted?
  • This is the result of alienation from your labor that capitalism excells at, get hobbies or start organizing as a way to break out of it.

    We don't need to change the entire god damn system to be useful, but at least building towards it is infinitely more rewarding than doing nothing IMO

  • Why all of a sudden tech companies are not being favorable to their users?
  • It's not pure greed though, if companies do not push down costs & push up revenues enough, they get replaced by those that do.

    It is capitalism doing what it does "best", here's a clip from I'm A Virgo that explains it better than me: https://youtu.be/lpagmvYZKRc?t=84

    There are niches where companies can hide out for a while, especially if they provide a service that needs local implementation, but social media isn't one of those niches, if you get outcompeted, your toast, no matter how big you peak, MySpace, Tumbler, Digg, Slashdot, etc, this is the monopolization effect of markets.

  • Why all of a sudden tech companies are not being favorable to their users?
  • Part of it is the standard crisis of capitalism, the profit you get from doing the same thing always declines, so over time you have to push up revenue (increasing prices, forcing people to pay, showing more ads, gathering more data, etc) & push down costs (fire engineers, run on less hardware, etc)

    Part of it is capitalisms natural tendency to create monopolies, and the lack of competition in a given field causing the company to then lose sight of what it's good at to compete in a bigger field.

    Part is that interest rates mean loans are no longer cheap, so taking on debt to get customer, to at some point down the line make money, is a less viable plan. Twitter is a special case where the bad loans are because that was the original deal not interested rate related, and Musk is trying to pull all of the enshitification levers at the same time.

    Part is that CEOs generally don't have a fucking clue about their products or what they are doing (it's a circuit job about who you know/blow, not what you know), so once one CEO starts firing/enshitifying, the rest just copy them so as to not be left out.

  • Elon doesn't want you browsing Twitter
  • I suspect his "logic" is that most users only read & do not interact or post (IIRC the general rule for socials is 90/9/1), so in addition to whatever technical reason, he thinks this is a genius way to get more subscribers.

    Fucking genius move, so glad he's fired everyone who would disagree.

  • What's your solution to end all wars?
  • Capitalist trade necessitates competition & states, even if you ignore how violent setting up that trade network was, the need for competition to push profits up means you need to put down local competition or regulations (e.g the US (where the biggest companies reside) need to coup democratic leaders that get in the way of profits, such as the Iranian coup, etc), but people don't like that so you end up with counter revolutions which puts forces hostile to the US in power, and eager to give the US a bloody nose (but mostly through proxy wars).

    And that's without even getting into the trade creating Cheneys who want war because it is profitable.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RI
    RIotingPacifist @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 38