[...] in my other jobs we were using Google Workspace which only shows metadata because of that[...]
Rare moment when Google is mentioned as behaving GDPR compliant... I mean, I know that big tech is vacuuming up all data and doesn't care about GDPR, but still.... You can be worse than effing Google?
@Kyrgizion@boredsquirrel I assume you"re using 365 version of Copilot wich can access Active Directory data which if they're correctly setup contains a supervisor field
Both of those declarations look weird to me. In Haskell it would be:
a :: Stringbob :: (String, Int, Double) -> [String]bob (a, b, c) = ...
... except that makes bob a function taking a tuple and it's much more idiomatic to curry it instead:
bob :: String -> Int -> Double -> [String]bob a b c = ...-- syntactic sugar for:-- bob = \a -> \b -> \c -> ...
The [T] syntax also has a prefix form [] T, so [String] could also be written [] String.
OCaml makes the opposite choice. In OCaml, a list of strings would be written string list, and a set of lists of strings would be string list set, a list of lists of integers int list list, etc.
Me, working on my personal hobby project, trying to integrate two totally unfamiliar platforms, in a programming language I've never used before.